but he would appear to observers to have successfully beaten a revisionist argument. We need many more clear photos of the areas concerned, in my opinion, before we can use them as slam dunk evidence.
In fact I agree with Perle that it's the one area of revisionism where the other side might actually beat us in a debate and make us look bad.
It is now obvious that the true-believer camp do not possess any photo’s of the morgues that they are willing to embellish and release, if they did, they would have no-doubt peddled them at the Irving trial. As I have already said, from the small resources revisionists have access too, the two pictures here show nothing, and so it would be in the industries interests to show a photo taken at the correct placement that does show their accusations, instead of putting all the onus on the revisionists who are not even allowed access to many sources, whilst the true believers attempt nothing, whilst having access to all.
As to saying the believers can win the argument, maybe you should at least try and enlighten your personal knowledge about the properties of concrete and the working methods when utilising it. For one, it would be wise to stop calling concrete ‘cement’. Cement is only one part of the ingredients that make up a concrete composite, cement is utterly useless on it’s own. There are an incredible amount of concrete mixes using all different types of ingredients, but generally concrete includes aggregate of around three quarter inch down, also binders of sand and dust, then cement at various ratios and finally water. If you can take the trouble to understand the fundamentals of concrete, you will then no-doubt be able to grasp the hideous fraudulence of this statement, that was passed off as proof as to why the holes are not visible:
Today, these four "small" holes that connected the wire-mesh columns and the chimneys cannot be observed in the ruined remains of the concrete slab.
From this statement that the so-called ‘Expert’ Van-Pelt gave in a court of law, a man who has personally visited the site (He’s allowed to!) and inspected the pancaked slab, he does not mention anything about there being any reason why one should not be able to find them due to the state of the slab no, indeed he implies that the reason why they are not visible (Which he admitted in court) is because they were plugged and rendered invisible!…This is a blatant lie of the highest order, and is absolutely impossible for any true-believer to overcome. So do not try and predict the outcome, when the whole conversation revolves around a shocking,
ing lie such as this. If you want to render Van-Pelt irrelevant, then maybe we should also render his lies irrelevant also, the lies that were used to deceitfully prove Irving wrong, when all the time he was completely right.
Once this odious lie was accepted, the journaille then went about their usual business of validating it and indelibly stamping it in the minds of masses who are ignoramuses to say the least.
Anyone who knows their subject knows fool well if the holes ever existed, upon physical inspection their faces would be visible today in the ruins and so would rebar junctions around them. And everyone who knows their subject also knows, that trying to use the argument that the holes were plugged, which magically reinstated the slab back to it’s original status, is a terrible lie of gross proportions.
Is this true? Rudolf describes a ventilation system that he acknowledges in morgue I.
Show me one and explain their runs and connectivity methods.
Added to the confusion is that the David Cole video is obviously in another building. Krema 1?
Correct! Krema I is at the main camp (The one Cole looked at), Krema’s II and III are mirrors of one another and reside at Birkenau. Krema’s IV and V are different structures completely, but also reside at Birkenau.
If you prove that certain eyewitnesses are lying about the holes on the roof. And if you prove that the one hole is completely a post-war hatchet job--as they call it, you are still not disproving what Hilberg said. Hilberg doesn't even mention a roof: "An SS man, wearing a gas mask fitted with a special filter, lifted the glass shutter over the lattice and emptied one can after another into the gas chamber. "
I am coming to the conclusion that you are not even at the right building! I think you are so overcome with confusion that you related Hilberg’s worthless utterances in relation to Krema IV to Krema II. This is why you are clambering up ladders, trying to pour pellets through dormer windows into the roofspace.
Kremas IV and V are completely different structures, both reside in the Birkenau camp but are in no way related to Krema’s II and III which are supposedly mirrors of one another. In Krema IV the alleged gas chambers are above ground. According to the eye witnesses the Zyklon-B pellets were poured in through a window and they had to wear gas masks to enter the building and to drag the corpses out.
What’s odd is the fact that for the HCN to work in Krema II Chicken wire things are now being promoted, yet in Krema IV you can still pour them directly onto the cold floor and they work, just like they used too in Krema II !