That seems plausible. Do we know the source of those train records? Is it really German records or something somebody noted (as I understand is the case with Danuta Czechs Kalendarium on train arrivals in Auschwitz).
Indeed, the 'Kalendarium' lists the transports 'to', I assume there are references. Yes?
Your analysis of the Polish report on physical evidence seems convincing as well. The phrase "over a surface covering about 2 ha. (5 acres), there are large quantities of ashes mixed with sand" is meant to suggest, I think, loads of ashes ("over a surface covering 2 ha."). But of course one can't extract anything objective from it. And a Polish report from 1946 doesn't make for a very credible source in the first place.
What report? All anyone ever claims is the supposed results, but we never see the actual alleged 'report'. Claims are not substance. The report, if true, would need to be verified as to authenticity, it would need to be examined for confirmation of the site, methodology, analysis of the allegedly found materials, etc. Compare to the German dig at Katyn. And then, where is the allegedly found materials? Why can't the 'holocau$t' Industry simply go to the site and confirm what is alleged?
Lambert admits having built gas chambers for operation T4 (Aktion T4), the Nazi euthanasia programme. For this purpose he travelled to the hospitals where the programme was to be installed and built the chambers. Later, being an expert in gas chamber technology, he was sent to Sobibor and Treblinka and built gas chambers there as well. Well, ok, you will say it's worth nothing without the transcripts, perhaps you are right, but I think the accumulated testimonies from trials in the 1960s cannot simply be ignored without further inquiry. The idea that they admitted more than they did in order to get a lenient verdict may explain something, but I find it difficult to accept that all the detailed stories of how people became involved with T4 and later were sent to the death camps because they were "experienced" are made up. You don't do this if you're innocent.
Right. A guy was sent to Treblinka & Sobibor to build diesel gas chambers after they were so successful in the euthanasia program. Laughable. I have a police station in Iraq I'll sell you if you believe that. Diesel is absurdly difficult to use for alleged mass murders, if not downright impossible as alleged (see F.P Berg's work). That blows away the Lambert 'confession' right there. There is no such evidence even for these 'Treblinka gas chambers' in the euthanasia programs. Euthanasia was/is common worldwide, by the way.
"You don't do this if you're innocent? Huh? Yes you do. When there is no option of challenging the 'gas chambers' because of 'judicial notice', your only option is to suck up to the prosecution and tell them what they want to hear and hope for leniency. Note, we have no court transcripts and certainly no cross examination records to see his verbatim 'testimony'. That trial, like the others was a show trial, Lambert had no viable option.
Any 'confessions' about gas chambers are necesarily worthless as Revisionists have shown that the gas chambers as alleged are utterly impossible. Simple as that. No matter how many times a lie is repeated, it is still a lie.
Repeated witcraft trials certainly didn't mean witchcraft was real.