antizog wrote:Often times, when talking to friends and associates, about the myths of the "holocaust", armed with facts and logic -this is what I get: I get an emotional, pathetic attempt at argument, with raised voice,
acting horrified, trying to drown me out. It's very frustrating. Some people are locked into permanent "denial" mode. Logic is not allowed to enter into the eqaution.
I have come to the conclusion that most people are conditioned like sheep to accept lies, and become very disturbed when inconvenient information threatens to shatter the worldview that they have had due to constant exposure those lies. The "holocaust" has become a religion, with it's obediant zombies repeating the dogma of the "6 million", the "gas chambers" or even more ridiculous "gas ovens".
If I ever come into a sum of large money -my goal would be to send pamphlets to every home in the United States. These pamhlets would offer, a concise, clear and thought provoking exposure of the "holocaust" lies, and who is behind them.
I know from personal experience exactly what you are refering to, and you're exactly right. There is a huge barrier to the truth; this stubborn "denial mode" that many people adhere to at all costs. Furthermore, they usually will minimize what you are saying by using labels. "Oh, he's just an anti-semite." Or "he's a neo-nazi." Or they'll use that old favorite label "racist." In social situations those trump card labels often times negate any evidence however clearly and rationally put forth, and simply neutralizes what you say.
I think with the vast majority of the population this will often be the case. Most simply are not thinkers, but are followers. But, more than this, the power of the Television and the media comes into play here. I don't think most people are aware of just how enormously powerful media images are. They have the power to shape views and attitudes on a wide range of complex socio-political issues in a relatively short period of time. And as movie and TV producers have gotten more skilled and experienced, so too has the power to influence us increased and become more effective. There are cues in movies and TVs which we may not even be conscience of, which clearly define acceptable and unacceptable behaviors and attitudes. Just to use two well known examples of this: the movie "Roots" had a huge impact on Americans, and was a hugely successful instrument of "white guilt" mongering, which Liberals, Blacks and Leftists have enjoyed the benefit of. Similarly the TV drama "The Holocaust" was also piece of "white guilt mongering" propaganda which also generated huge benefits for Jews, Liberals and Leftists, which are still being enjoyed and mined to this day.
I could go on. But the communists understood early on the tremendous power of the cinema. And I think the loss of the American movie houses to the control of the Jews was a huge set-back in the health and well-being of this nation, and of the West in general. The values of Hollywood have been an alien presence in most Americans lives for decades now. And I think that most Americans understand that. They may not openly state that "Hollywood is controlled by evil Jews" but in the back of their mind they understand and know that to be the case.
While watching TV shows and commercials, and while watching movies, lets try to be more critical in our thinking, and try to pick up on subtle cues from the producers on various societal norms. One trick I've picked up on is to use unattractive whites or whites who are in some way unpleasent in dress and personality (such as, is a drunk, always wears a dirty shirt, is always complaining, is bitter about his life, is a high school dropout, etc.) as being the ones who espouse the racially unacceptable attitudes. While the liberal Jew character will be educated, likeable, sucessful, affable and attractive (having reaped the benefit of plastic surgeons nose-job specialists, I'm sure. Haw haw! Forgive that, couldn't resist that jab.

). Another trick I've come across is that characters that play societally successful people like surgeons, doctors, esteemed psychiatrist, etc. will invariably have Jewish names. While characters who play frazzled and over-worked fast food managers, Janitors, or gas station attendants will be whites with unmistakably gentile names.
Which brings up another point: Jews masking how many of them there are in our media, by that age old trick of changing their names. Many Americans are fooled by this, and simply don't know that Wolf Blitzer, Barbara Walters, Mike Wallace and John Stewart are all Jews. They used to say this was necessary to prevent themselves from being the victim of anti-semitism. However, in todays world, where the vast majority of westerners are eager to demonstrate their adherence to the views and attitudes of the Jew-dominated establishment, that excuse doesnt fly anymore. They are doing it to mask how many of them there are on the television. Its a means to fool people. So, I think one thing that can be done to help bring this realization to the unthinking masses is to expose this reality, and to casually point out to people as often as you can get away with doing, that some well known TV personality/actor/anchor/journalist/commentator is in fact a Jew. People know that Jews are only 2% to 3% of the population, and if the fact that there are so many #$^%$#& Jews on the boob tube, or on the silver screen becomes clear, people will know that thats fundamentally not right, and just MAY just being to wonder about things. I think many people will at least begin to wonder why there are so many Jews in positions of power and influence in our media, and what effect this is having on their broadcasts. Or they may just turn the channel and keep watching their soaps. But again I think one thing that we can do is point this reality out to them, as nonchalantly as we can, to bring this reality to them. Breaking down this "wall of denial" is going to have to be done one hammer-blow at a time.
-You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
-The establishment can't control the web, and the control of information through all means but one, is no control at all.