The Leichenkeller Inventory List

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

The Leichenkeller Inventory List

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Tue Mar 18, 2003 10:48 am)

Image
Above inventory lists for morgue 1 and morgue 2 of Krema II in Auschwitz-Birkenau four "Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen" and four "Holzblenden."

The list is from THHP, who got it from Pressac and who found it in Auschwitz. THHP translates "Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung" as "wire-mesh introduction device." and "Holzblenden" as "wooden covers".

This entry into the inventory list is considered by the anti-revisionists as proof that morgue 1 was used as a homicidal gas chamber.
:D

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10338
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 8 years ago (Tue Mar 18, 2003 1:53 pm)

Coming from the so called 'holocau$t' History Project, I'm not the least bit surprised. The shysters there will try anything, they are merely echoing the French pharmacist, Jean-Claude Pressac's thoroughly refuted offering.

Samuel Crowell's research on this.
from:
http://www.codoh.com/incon/inconabr_2.html

For example, references to "gas-tight doors" or "gas-tight windows" as well as "Blenden" or "Holzblenden" correspond to common civil air defense terms. Jean Claude Pressac, at the very least, should be credited with unearthing no less than 39 documents that provide strong documentary evidence that each of the Birkenau crematoria was equipped with a gas-tight bomb shelter.[9]

Image
Graphic 1: A Blende, or protective window for Krema IV or V

also see:
http://www.codoh.com/graphics/gsHOESSH.GIF

more from:
http://www.codoh.com/incon/inconpressac.html
Image
German advertisement for gasproof Türen
(doors) and Blenden (shutters or windows).
and:
Image

on Dratnetzeinschiebvorrichtung (wire devices) and Holzblenden (shutters):
URL: http://www.codoh.com/incon/inconabr_2.html
Criminal Trace #8 4 Dratnetzeinschiebvorrichtung
and
Criminal Trace #9 4 Holzblenden

Since these two elements on the inventory agree in number, and were written in, it is assumed by all parties that their function is connected.

Blenden are simply shutters, and may be made from either steel or wood. They were commonly used in anti-gas shelters in order to make an opening gas tight, such as a window, or any other opening [Source: GL39, 111; GL40, 22ff; GL40, 26]. A benign interpretation is possible, therefore it is not a criminal trace.

Further on this point, Pressac [ATO, 425ff] provides several photographs of shutters, which are identified as the gassdichten Fenster (or Türen) of Crematoria IV and V. These shutters are generally identical in size, shape, and construction to ordinary wooden Blenden as can readily be seen by consulting the literature cited above, and they are also of the right size for emergency exits. Thus gassdichten Fenster (or Türen ), Blenden and Holzblenden, and wooden shutters are all the same thing. This is important not only because it demonstrates the propensity of the Birkenau construction workers and engineers to describe things by unconventional names, but also because it helps put Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung in context.

Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung is a neologism, and we cannot offer a definitive explanation. Pressac speculates that it represents a wire mesh device whereby Zyklon B was "induced" into the extermination gas chamber, but there is no material corroboration for this. We offer the following observations to support our inference:

1) At least two advertisements depict wire mesh screens in the anti-gas shelter literature, one depicts a screen behind an open shutter. [Source: BL42, v]

2) The anti-gas shelter literature contains an advertisement for wire mesh [Drahtnetz]. [Source: BL42, v]

3) According to the anti-gas shelter literature, all windows and other openings require some kind of mesh, netting, grating or grille [Rost, Gitterstäbe, Geflecht von Draht]. [Source: LB 182, 183; GL40 26; BL40, 263]

4) The Auschwitz work order Nr. 353 dated April 27, 1943 [ATO, 441] contains an order for "12 stücke Fenstergitter 50 x 70 cm" which is accepted as a reference to wire mesh screens or grilles for the 12 gassdichten Fenster (or Türen), noted above as identical to Blenden and Holzblenden.

5) Therefore, we can propose that the Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung bear a relationship to the Holzblenden similar to the relationship of the Fenstergitter to the gassdichten Fenster (or Türen ) of Crematoria IV and V.

6) In addition, the literature specifies that such openings must be available for emergency egress. Hence, we hypothesize that these inserts must be removable. [Source: S 5, LDB 174ff, 182, 183]

7) There are several references in the anti-gas shelter literature to "Schieber" which serve the function of something that slides in and blocks, filters, or mediates a space (Absperrschieber, Rosettenschieber, Aufbläseschieber). All of these characterize a "Schieber" as something that is slid into something else, none of them describe a device that is slid into something else so that something else can be slid into it. [Source: advertisement, BL42, V] Therefore, we conclude that the characterization of Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung as a "wire mesh induction device" is semantically incorrect.

8 Finally, the Auschwitz work order Nr. 78 dated March 11, 1943 [ATO, 440] contains an order in Polish "na wykonanie zaslon i kontowek dla krematorium II /BW 30/ z tresci ktorego wynika, ze dla wykonania tego samowienia zuzyto gaze druciana i druciana plecionke." which can be translated as "for the manufacture of screens with scantlings [or screens with edges] for Crematorium II /BW 30/ the gist of which is [z tresci ktorego wynika] that wire gauze and wire mesh are to be used to meet the order."

The above order is in Polish because the original order is not available. According to Pressac, (ATO 438), someone at the Auschwitz Museum borrowed the document for home study and didn't return it. This is the only document missing, hence Pressac had to rely on a Polish language abstract prepared for the Höß trial and notarized by Jan Sehn. However, it seems clear that the order is significant in defining the nature of the Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung. The reference to screens is not a reference to induction devices, and indeed, they sound like the screens for emergency exits discussed earlier [LBD 174-177]. If our rendering of the admittedly vague Polish is incorrect, it would be helpful if the document was returned to the Museum where it belongs.

Our hypothesis, then, is that the Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung were simply removable wire mesh screens that were placed into openings that the Holzblenden were designed to cover. The corroboration for this inference derives from the points from the literature noted above. A benign interpretation is possible, therefore it is not a criminal trace.

Finally, it should be noted that Pressac himself has observed that the roof of Morgue #1 of Crematorium II (for which these 4 pairs were designated) shows only two holes in its largely collapsed but still intact roof (ATO, 436). Therefore, in whatever manner these 4 pairs of Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung and Holzblenden were meant to be used, they could not all have been used exclusively in the roof of Morgue #1 of Crematorium II. This fact weakens Pressac's interpretation concerning their construction and intent.


- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:24 pm)

For an inventory list this one is rather skimpy. The list seems to be written on a pre-printed form which lists electrical lighting fixtures, heating stoves and ovens and water taps. It seems to me that the form may have been originally prepared for the use of dormitory barracks. For morgue 1 are listed 11 lamp holders and the bulbs and 5 water taps. Plus 4 Holzblenden and 4 Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen added by hand.

And the inventory list does not say a word about the five furnaces, the crematorium ovens nor all the accessories necessary for the process. A very sloppy inventory for a morgue indeed!
And this then was signed by three high SS-officers!

It seems to me that someone tried very hard to make those Holzblenden and Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen appear very official. :D

Holzblende.
“Holz” is in English “wood”. “Blende” is related to the English “blind”. We all know what a “venetian-blind” is. A “Blende” is basically a shutter with the shutter flaps mounted at an angle of 45° downwards. This is to prevent rain from entering through.
Each morgue had two openings to the outside for ventilation, one for air exhaust and one for air intake. And each air opening was provided with such a “Blende” or shutter in order to prevent rain from entering, so there was a total of four Holzblenden. At that time (and I think even today) the flaps of such a shutter were made of wood (similar to window frames). Sometimes these flaps can be adjusted, opened or closed. Now we call it a damper. The damper can be motor-operated and the degree of opening can be done automatically for temperature control via a feedback loop system.

Such a “Blende” is not a “wooden cover”, as THHP and others maintain and want me to believe.

Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung.
This word is a combination of four words:
“Draht” (wire)
“Netz” (net)
“einschieben” (to push in, insert)
“Vorrichtung” (device, apparatus)

The shutter for each air ventilation opening was provided with a wire-netting. This is to prevent vermin, rodent like rats and mice, birds from nesting and objects from entering into the ventilation ducts and building inside. It is standard procedure and I have installed these many times myself. Please look under the roof awning of your house the next time you have a chance. You will see several openings provided for air circulation for the roof attic space which will all be provided with a wire netting or screen. That is what we are talking about here.

These wire nettings or screens were in this case mounted in such a way that they could be removed in order to be cleaned or repaired and re-inserted (similar to the filter for the air heating furnace in my house, which has to be replaced once a year).

Also: As no one does “insert” rice into the cooking pot, rice is poured, Zyklon B would similarly be “poured” or “distributed”, but not “inserted”.
THHP’s translation of Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung to "wire-mesh insertion device" or "wire-mesh introduction device" is incorrect.
The wire netting was probably mounted in a frame and inserted into the ventilation duct or wall opening, it did not serve to insert Zyklon B.

On this one I do agree with Samuel Crowell. :D

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10338
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 8 years ago (Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:36 pm)

And leave it to the 'holocau$t History Project' to display this silly, laughable 'document'.
Leave it to Revisionists to shoot them down....again. :wink:

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Hebden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Here and there, mostly there

Postby Hebden » 1 decade 8 years ago (Wed Mar 19, 2003 7:56 am)

Sailor wrote:On this one I do agree with Samuel Crowell. :D


From the article AUSCHWITZ THE SAMUEL CROWELL BOMB SHELTER THESIS: A HISTORICALLY UNFOUNDED HYPOTHESIS by Mr. Carlo Mattogno available at http://russgranata.com:

Nonetheless, Crowell's systematic distortion of documents and facts in his article "Bomb Shelters in Birkenau: A Reappraisal "[4] and his unshakeable tenacity for supporting patently false theses, induced me to reconsider my decision. Since his thesis has found proselytes among revisionists - however incredible this may seem - and for the sake of historical accuracy, I again take part in the debate.

[...]

As I have already written, Crowell simply confuses things which have a superficial resemblance but are different in function and purpose, with things that are identical. But this is not the problem. The real problem is whether at the time when Pressac situates his criminal traces (January-April 1943) measures were taken at Auschwitz for air-raid defense.

Crowell, instead of studying this essential point, started with the firm assumption that air-raid measures were taken in the crematoria of Birkenau, and then tried to justify his assertions with documents.

He first postulated his dogmatic conclusion, and then searched for documents to prove it. Since these documents do not exist, he resorted to systematic distortion of the documents, which in fact demonstrate nothing at all, as will be seen from the following analysis.


[...]

Another example of the Crowell oportunistic argumentation.

Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen and Holzblenden

Crowell claims that

"the wire mesh devices were simply wire mesh screens to fit into windows which the wooden shutters would cover, probably to provide some protection against bomb splinters, such a screen being normally called a 'Splitterschutzvorrichtung.' "

A few lines later Crowell adds:

"We see no reason to abandon our position on either this trace or the Holzblenden, although it is clear that proper location for such paraphernalia would be vertical wall openings and these have not yet been discovered" (p. 27).

This criminal trace is found in the documentation of the Übergabeverhandlung of Krema II to the camp commandant (31 March 1943) and refers to Leichenkeller 2. [55] Crowell's explanation is unfounded not only by the documents, but also architecturally. From the documenary point of view it is arbitrary, since on the one hand we are ignorant of what the Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen and relative Holzblenden really were; on the other, German anti air-raid technical literature knew Holzblenden but not Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen. The claim that the latter were simple Splitterschutzvorrichtungen is another non-proven assertion.

The statement that the presumed vertical apertures "have not yet been discovered" is false, since the walls of Leichenkeller 2 of Krema II are quite visible and show not the slightest trace of these presumed four "vertical wall openings." Therefore, there is really nothing "yet" to be discovered in these walls.
Last edited by Hebden on Wed Mar 19, 2003 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Hebden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Here and there, mostly there

Postby Hebden » 1 decade 8 years ago (Wed Mar 19, 2003 9:35 am)

Sailor wrote:For an inventory list this one is rather skimpy. The list seems to be written on a pre-printed form which lists electrical lighting fixtures, heating stoves and ovens and water taps. It seems to me that the form may have been originally prepared for the use of dormitory barracks. For morgue 1 are listed 11 lamp holders and the bulbs and 5 water taps. Plus 4 Holzblenden and 4 Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen added by hand.

And the inventory list does not say a word about the five furnaces, the crematorium ovens nor all the accessories necessary for the process. A very sloppy inventory for a morgue indeed!
And this then was signed by three high SS-officers!


If this and the matching document for KIII are considered authentic, the obvious explanation would be that these are examples of partial inventories, submitted, perhaps, upon the completion of the work referred to, e.g. fitting of the gas tight door. Neither could be considered a final and complete inventory. We do not know if any other documents of this type have been uncovered by Mr. Pressac or Mr. Mattogno in the Auschwitz or Moscow archives, although we doubt it.

In our opinion, there is no reasonable non-homicidal explanation for why these contraptions should be fitted in a subterranean morgue. This is why we believe these inventories to be simple forgeries.

Holzblende.
“Holz” is in English “wood”. “Blende” is related to the English “blind”. We all know what a “venetian-blind” is. A “Blende” is basically a shutter with the shutter flaps mounted at an angle of 45° downwards. This is to prevent rain from entering through.
Each morgue had two openings to the outside for ventilation, one for air exhaust and one for air intake. And each air opening was provided with such a “Blende” or shutter in order to prevent rain from entering, so there was a total of four Holzblenden. At that time (and I think even today) the flaps of such a shutter were made of wood (similar to window frames). Sometimes these flaps can be adjusted, opened or closed. Now we call it a damper. The damper can be motor-operated and the degree of opening can be done automatically for temperature control via a feedback loop system.


Ingenious explanation but we're highly sceptical. Wouldn't ventilation fans come fitted with their own standard protective grills? Why are the respective covers for the ventilation system in the other Leichenkeller not listed - surely they would have been fitted at the same time? The designation of Blenden as shutters-cum-blinds isn't enhanced by the initial post in this thread where the Blenden are single pieces of (in this case) metal. You say these shutters-blinds are now called 'dampers'. What are they in German? To have your theory taken seriously, it would be necessary to provide contemporary German documents referring to Blenden in the context of ventilation covers.
Last edited by Hebden on Fri Mar 21, 2003 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Wed Mar 19, 2003 9:59 am)

I did not really discuss the bomb shelter issue.

Anyway. Here is part of an interview between Rudolf and Senior Engineer Walter Schreiber, who was at that time construction superintendent at tha Auschwitz camp:
Frage: Wissen Sie etwas über Einwurfluken in den Stahlbetondecken?

Antwort: Nein, nichts mehr aus der Erinnerung. Da aber diese Keller als Nebenzweck auch für den Luftschutz dienen sollten, wären Einwurfluken kontraproduktiv gewesen. Ich hätte gegen die Anordnung solcher gewiß Bedenken geäußert.

Question: Do you know something about the introduction openings in the steel reinforced concrete ceilings?

Answer: No, nothing from memory. But since these basements as a secondary purpose were to serve as air raid shelters, introduction openings would have been counter productive. I would have certainly expressed concerns about such arrangement.


Where would the crematorium workers go during an air raid? With 10 inches of reinforced concrete and 2 ft of earth on top, the basements of Krema II offered a better protection than 99% of the German people had during air raids.

Mattogno wrote: The statement that the presumed vertical apertures "have not yet been discovered" is false, since the walls of Leichenkeller 2 of Krema II are quite visible and show not the slightest trace of these presumed four "vertical wall openings." Therefore, there is really nothing "yet" to be discovered in these walls.


Look at the cross section of morgue 1 Krema II
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/camps/aus ... ection.jpg Or
http://vho.org/D/rga2/Image304.gif

There are two double air ducts shown.
Item 1 in the bottom left and right corners are air exhaust ducts, item 2, the triangular shaped ducts in the upper left and right corners, are double air intake ducts.
These ducts must have gone somewhere to the outside air, and Mattogno knows that both morgue 1 and 2 were provided with forced air ventilation.
I don’t have the detail installation plans for the duct interface to the outside air, where and how it was done. But we always provided louvered shutters and screens at the end of the duct work.
:D

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10338
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 8 years ago (Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:22 am)

Hebden said:
In our opinion, there is no reasonable non-homicidal explanation for why these contraptions should be fitted in a subterranean morgue. This is why we believe these inventories to be simple forgeries.

An excellent point.

but Hebden also said:

To have your theory taken seriously, it would be necessary for you to provide contemporary German documents referring to these Blenden in the context of ventilation covers.


I suppose then that German commercial advertisements (images were posted showing shutters with wire mesh) for such are not convincing.

Either way we cut it (did I say 'we'?), the so called 'holocau$t History Project' have been caught in yet another lie.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:44 am)

Hebden wrote:Wouldn't ventilation fans come fitted with their own standard protective grills?

If you buy a portable fan at Sears, yes, they come with a protective grill. But this is different. Inside the morgues fans and air intakes are not assembled as a unit but were probably mounted at different locations.
In underground power plants the ventilating equipment is usually installed in a separate room, it can be quite complex, with air ducts all over the place. The air intake and exhausts are often located in the plant entrance building.

Why are the respective covers for the ventilation system in the other Leichenkeller not listed - surely they would have been fitted at the same time?

Did they not list four covers total, two for each morgue?

The designation of Blenden as shutters-cum-blinds isn't enhanced by the initial post in this thread where the Blenden are single pieces of (in this case) metal. You say these shutters-blinds are now called 'dampers'.

Only if the louvres are adjustable are they called ‘dampers’, like for a heating system where the temperature may be controlled. This would not be necessay if only ventilation is involved.

What are they in German? To have your theory taken seriously, it would be necessary to provide contemporary German documents referring to Blenden in the context of ventilation covers.


I need some time :D

Hebden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Here and there, mostly there

Postby Hebden » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 20, 2003 3:04 pm)

Why are the respective covers for the ventilation system in the other Leichenkeller not listed - surely they would have been fitted at the same time?

Did they not list four covers total, two for each morgue?


No, the four Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen and four Holzblenden are listed only for Leichenkeller 2. Exterminationists, of course, contend this was a mix-up and LK 1 was meant (how the 3 signatories of the document all managed to overlook this error is another matter).

We'd assumed, wrongly it seems, that your Blenden and attendant wire nets were required both internally and externally for the intake and outtake of the ventilation system. We see now that you only indicated their external use.

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 20, 2003 4:25 pm)

Hebden wrote: We'd assumed, wrongly it seems, that your Blenden and attendant wire nets were required both internally and externally for the intake and outtake of the ventilation system. We see now that you only indicated their external use.

You are correct. The Blenden would be externally, with the wire nets right behind the Blenden.
But where? Mattogno says that there were no openings in the Leichenkeller walls. Also there was not much space for openings. The wall extended about 3 ft above ground. With 1 ft ceiling thickness and 1 ft height of the internal air duct there is practically no space for such openings in the wall. Maybe the air ducts were routed over to the main building and exited there.

I wish I had access to the detail architectural drawings for the air intake and exhausts for Leichenkeller 1. Rudolf must have these, because he stated that for Leichenkeller 1 the arrangement for air intake and outlet was wrongfully designed and formed an air flow short circuit: they were too close together and the exhaust was literally blowing back into the air intake. (The gas believers have their gas blown right back from the outlet through the intake back into the ‘gas chamber’. At least part of it).

I have not found yet a satisfactory and authoritative document that would indicate that at that time the word ‘Blende’ was used for an air intake shutter or screen. I contacted several German ventilation engineering firms but have no answer yet. A friend owns a heating and ventilating construction firm and I will see him in Germany in the fall and will discuss this with him then. (I will also visit Buchenwald at that time, they have a Topf designed two muffle cremation oven and I want to take an engineering “look-see”. I don’t quite understand Mattogno’s description of the gas generator, the preheating and indirect cremation process and heat transfer through recuperators. Maybe I can talk the Buchenwald administrator into letting me copy the cremation furnace design drawings. Also the location of the ‘Gas Prüfer’ is of interest).

The word ‘Blende’ is translated into English as follows
(I am using for translations http://dict.tu-chemnitz.de/ , an online dictionary with over 140,000 entries):

1. blende (ore)
2. cover, panel, screen
3. diaphragm (photo)
4. aperture
5. blind (Venetian)
6. fascia board

I was thinking of a louvered or rain-tight cover. The German word for this is now ‘Lüftungsgitter’ (ventilation grille).

They have in Germany for each specialty separate dictionaries. But I have not yet found the one for mechanical or ventilation engineering.
:D

Hebden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Here and there, mostly there

Postby Hebden » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 27, 2003 7:38 am)

Sailor wrote:For an inventory list this one is rather skimpy. The list seems to be written on a pre-printed form which lists electrical lighting fixtures, heating stoves and ovens and water taps. It seems to me that the form may have been originally prepared for the use of dormitory barracks. For morgue 1 are listed 11 lamp holders and the bulbs and 5 water taps.


We meant to mention this. The inventory has 5 water taps listed for LK 1 and 3 listed for LK 2 (the undressing room).

According to Mr. Pressac:

A Bauleitung inventory drawing indicates that three taps were in fact installed in the gas chamber [LK 1]. But they were destroyed in the first gassings and it was decided not to replace them.


(http://www.mazal.org/archive/documents/Tauber/Tauber04.htm)

According to this earlier drawing, 5 taps were intended for LK 2.

Mr. Pressac used this to argue that the numbers for the taps were mistakenly inverted in the inventory document. In so doing, he could also argue that that the Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung and Holzblenden listed for LK2 (the undressing room) had actually been located in LK 1, the gas chamber.

We hope that's clear....

We must admit to not having previously given much thought to whether LK 1 or 2 even had a drainage system or not. Perhaps Mr. Sailor could use his engineering expertise to tell us about how subterranean drainage systems work. In short, where does the water go?

User avatar
Scott
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 7:00 am

Postby Scott » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 27, 2003 8:41 am)

Hebden wrote:We must admit to not having previously given much thought to whether LK 1 or 2 even had a drainage system or not. Perhaps Mr. Sailor could use his engineering expertise to tell us about how subterranean drainage systems work. In short, where does the water go?

My understanding is that the Leichenkeller basements all had drains, as would be expected. Basically, although already below the watertable, the water from the drain would simply need to be piped whatever distance to a lower elevation downstream. Also, the Birkenau watertable might have been different during the war with maintained drainage systems.
:)

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 27, 2003 11:38 am)

Hebden wrote: We must admit to not having previously given much thought to whether LK 1 or 2 even had a drainage system or not. Perhaps Mr. Sailor could use his engineering expertise to tell us about how subterranean drainage systems work. In short, where does the water go?


The drawings of Leichenkeller 1 show on the centerline between every second pair of columns a drain . These would normally be interconnected via drain pipes with all other drain points of the crematorium (sinks, toilets etc) and then led to a drainage sump, a container at a lower elevation than the lowest drain point of the buildings. This sump most likely also collected drainage from other surrounding buildings. From there it is normally pumped into the sewage treatment installation (those circular contraptions close to the crematorium).
Of course all these drain points in the morgue have to be carefully sealed during the alleged gassings in order to prevent HCN gas from escaping through the drain pipes and possibly poisoning other rooms or buildings.

Scott wrote: Also, the Birkenau water table might have been different during the war with maintained drainage systems.

Mattogno talked about this in an essay of the last VffG magazine: "Verbrennungsgruben" und Grundwasserstand in Birkenau
http://vho.org/VffG/2002/4/Mattogno421-424.html

During excavation works for the basement of the Central Sauna building the groundwater had to be pumped out with electrically driven pumps. Mattogno shows some copies for the requisition of these pumps.
Also there were many drainage unwatering trenches installed inside the camp area. Mattogno shows some pictures in his essay. This was apparently quite successful. In fact they could lower the water table so low that the wells for pumping water for the camp were dry. So they had to raise the water level back up again. There were probably about 100,000 inmates, the population of a medium sized town, and a lot of water was required to keep things going.
:(

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 8 years ago (Thu Mar 27, 2003 2:33 pm)

The other question I forgot to ask on the subject matter: Should'n't there be a similar inventory list as I posted above for Leichenkeller 1 Krema II for Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III also? Does anyone know?
Or maybe the fellow who prepared the list for Krema II forgot Krema III? Maybe?
:D


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests