U.S. 'Holocaust' Museum busted in gas chamber fraud

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10066
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

U.S. 'Holocaust' Museum busted in gas chamber fraud

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 5 years ago (Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:35 pm)

This is a great example of the fraudulent nature of the 'holocau$t' Industry. Think about the sheer desperation and lack of ethics by those who benefit from the lies. The average man on the street would find it hard to imagine that a group of people would engage in such blatant acts. But here it is, a prime example for all to see.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Comments invited.

- Hannover

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek

By David Thomas

Image
At left: The door at the concentration camp Majdanek from which the USHMM made the replica which is now on display in Washington D.C.. At right, the real function of the door and thousands more like it is shown in a widely distributed German ad for bomb-shelter doors and window covers, intended for military and civilian use. Approximately 670,000 German civilians were killed in the massive Allied terror-bombing campaign directed at population centers throughout Germany.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A standard air-raid shelter door is displayed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum along with the claim that it is a casting of the door to a homicidal gassing chamber at the Majdanek concentration camp. The peephole was supposed to be for monitoring the progress of killing with cyanide gas released from a common fumigation product called Zyklon B. Those looking through it were sometimes said to do so to monitor and improve the efficiency of the killing system, but a more common charge is that it was done for sadistic personal pleasure.

Many are convinced that German hatred for Jews was so great that they derived great amusement and satisfaction from watching their death throes, as well as engaging in bizarre forms of harassment and torture, some of them quite fantastic, bordering on the supernatural. There's been a steady tendency for the claims to increase their variety and horrific detail with the passage of time, perhaps showing the dubious phenomenon of recovered memory enjoying its most productive period ever.

The realities of the myths that sprang from a thirst for vengeance and are sustained by it still, with the added factor of a memorial industry and reparations in the billions of dollars that depend on it totally, are often very different.

The door and window shutter (Türen und Blenden) on the right appear in an advertisement for equipment to outfit the thousands of air-raid shelters built across Germany and occupied territories, including the concentration camps. (See: Technique and Operation of German Anti-Gas Shelters in World War II, by Samuel Crowell) As noted in the Crowell article, and several more to come, it has recently been discovered that German air-raid shelters were required to also provide protection against gas attack. With WWII coming only 20 years after WWI, memory of the horrors of gas warfare then were relatively fresh, and the Germans took more defensive measures than most since the conflict was sure to be played out again on European soil.

The peepholes in the doors were for safety purposes. People inside wanted to be able to see conditions outside before exposing themselves to possible danger, and rescuers from outside had the same concern, plus wanting to make a quick evaluation without opening the door in order to save precious time (seeing if everyone was dead, or if no one was inside).

Steadily, piece by piece, the sources of the myth are being exposed at an accelerating pace. Camps inside the borders of Germany were available for inspection by many people after the war, and the adamant accusations of killing centers there made in 1945-46 were officially admitted to be false in 1960. Despite this, or perhaps because of it, show trials were held to reinforce the story in the public mind, particularly and most successfully in Germany, and another group of German veterans were convicted based on flimsy, contradictory and often quite unbelievable oral testimonies, as at the earlier kangaroo trials. There, accusations that someone struck a prisoner were sufficient to result in a death sentence for participating in a conspiracy to commit crimes against humanity. It was not necessary to prove that the person killed anyone, only that he or she played an active part in a sprawling system that did so. Despite the fact that the false allegations about mass gassing chambers in Dachau and other German camps came from some of the same sources that made similar charges about Auschwitz, Treblinka and Majdanek, there was no call to question the now suspect testimony. It was accepted as fully true with no hesitation.

But with the fall of the Soviet Union and the opening of many of its archives, fresh eyes and attitudes are actively seeking the truth of the matter and in the process finding truth to be a scarce commodity when atrocity charges are involved. The now Religion of the Holocaust has defenders as fiercely immune to logic and a concern for truth as any fundamentalist religion that has ever existed. Nevertheless, at some point the burden of supporting the unsupportable will become too hard and too dangerous, and we predict that at that time the gas chamber canard will be quietly abandoned in favor of the real and documented wrongs of a lesser but still horrible magnitude.

Perhaps the Allied powers will one day own up to their own crimes, committed in an effort to grind the will of the German people into dust so that they would not pose a future threat to those who consider domination of world trade and finance to be their exclusive possession. Almost 15 million Germans were summarily expelled from their homelands that in some cases went back 700 years or more, cast into the harshest European winter in a century with only what they could grab and carry. More than two million of them died of starvation, disease, and merciless attacks from those they encountered on their frozen paths of desperation. It was a pogrom of a magnitude unmatched in recorded history, and not only have the victims never received any kind of compensation, their story is known to very few because of a virulent anti-German bias that flourishes in the corridors of power. The innocent souls of the German victims are surely as worthy of acknowledgement as any other group victimized, and the situation cries out for justice, for at least a chronicling of the truth.

That lot will fall to another generation, but this will be the one to force a public and honest re-examination of what really went on inside the German forced labor camps from 1940 to 1945. Any who feel threatened by truth or the search for it say far more about the validity of their own positions than do their critics.

-- David Thomas, 7/12/97


Image

A remarkably sinister rendering of the air raid shelter door casting at the USHMM, found at their student outreach web offering.

http://www.ushmm.org/misc-bin/add_gobac ... /892-1.htm

The caption there is:

"This casting of a door to the gas chamber in the Majdanek killing center, near Lublin, Poland, was commissioned by the United States Holocaust Museum in 1989. Majdanek functioned as a concentration camp, forced-labor camp, and killing center. Each gas chamber in Majdanek was fitted with an airtight metal door. It was bolted shut before gas entered the chamber inside. SS guards could observe the killing process through peepholes in the upper center of the door."

But, as can be seen from the ads and Crowell's article, this is just one of thousands of such doors that were produced in an attempt to keep the people in Germany from being blasted into eternity by the relentless carpet-bombings.

NOTE: The original ads were black and white, color was added for contrast and easier viewing.

courtesy of www.vho.org
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

McMarcus00
Member
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 3:42 am

Postby McMarcus00 » 1 decade 5 years ago (Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:34 am)

Worse is, that people continue to believe this lie. When will people learn that the holocau$t is a fake?

The Jews lock up deniers because they know the truth, and the Jews only weapon is to remove them and prevent them from spreading the truth.

This is a good article too!

Thanks for posting it

Mark_Twain
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:08 pm

Postby Mark_Twain » 1 decade 5 years ago (Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:17 pm)

Most valuable real estate in USA


Image



Image



The Museum opened more than seven years ago on land provided by the Federal government, which also contributes towards basic operating costs...... The current FY02 budget for the Museum is $55.4 million, with $34.4 million contributed by the federal government and $21.0 million from private contributions.

UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON D.C. (Established by the UNANIMOUS passage of Congressional legislation in October 1980 (Public Law 96-388).

Although American Jews were not victims of the Holocaust and it was American soldiers who liberated Jews from Concentration Camps, the U.S. Government in response to Jewish pressure, donated federal land (Illegally) and paid with U.S. Tax dollars (illegally) to construct a PRIVATE Holocaust museum on the venerable American National Mall in Washington D.C.

After paying for its construction, Congress annually appropriates the majority of the funds (tax money) for the Museum's maintenance. In fact, President Bill Clinton on October 13, 2000 signed Legislation Granting this "PRIVATE" Museum "Permanent Federal Status" which permits Congress to fund the museum annually without any question or review.





From the U.S. Holocaust Museum Press Release: October 13, 2000

Washington D.C.:-----President Bill Clinton yesterday signed legislation that establishes permanent status for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, which was created to be the national living memorial to the Holocaust and its victims.

The Museum "serves as a constant and painful reminder that racism, anti-semitism and all forms of hatred are ever-present dangers, and that indifference to hatred makes each of us complicit in some way," President Clinton said.

The granting of permanent status is significant as an expression of the importance the U.S. government places on the Museum Permanent status permits Congress to provide funding without having to review the Federal role.

"The presence of permanent authorization for appropriations signifies that America’s national memorial to the victims of the Holocaust is now an integral part of our capital city. It represents our nation’s permanent commitment to never forget past failures of responsibility and to enlist conscience to uphold life and law permanently. Therefore, the memorial stands so appropriately among our greatest monuments to democracy," says the Chair of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, Rabbi Irving Greenberg.


Every school kid that goes to Washington visits

Image

And lets not forget all FBI trainees attend classes here

McMarcus00
Member
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 3:42 am

Postby McMarcus00 » 1 decade 5 years ago (Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:29 pm)

Someone should post some of the evidence that the Revionsist have found and hand them out just outside the entry of the Holocau$t Museum. Of course the Jews and Neo-Cons would promptly act on such a "terrorist" attack. They can only lock people up, they can't counter our claims!

Peter H
Member
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 pm

Postby Peter H » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:24 pm)

Of course it's a shelter door, but why can't it have been used as a gas chamber door, if it was "gaszeit"?

The desinfection chambers at Dachau looks like that, but without the peephole.

Radar
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:25 pm

Postby Radar » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:17 pm)

The same argument could be made that the Holocaust Museum could have labeled this "a common gas-proof air raid shelter door that was used as a gas chamber door in this instance." And shown the "Repal" advertisement.

No reason this couldn't have been done either...

User avatar
onemanshowmcd
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Postby onemanshowmcd » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sun Jun 12, 2005 12:49 am)

Those looking through it were sometimes said to do so to monitor and improve the efficiency of the killing system, but a more common charge is that it was done for sadistic personal pleasure.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't one of the reasons for the Nazis pursuing a policy of "industrial killing" via mass gassings to relieve the psychological burden of killing experienced during mass shootings. Yet we are told that they took some sort of sadistic glee in watching people undergo their demise in this most horrible of ways.

Great googly moogly, what a mass of contradictions.
"Oh. Lord, make my enemies ridiculous."

Goethe
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:41 am

Postby Goethe » 1 decade 4 years ago (Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:54 pm)

From 'Forty-Six Important Unanswered Questions Regarding the Nazi Gas Chambers', by David Cole:

(38 ) To sum up the Majdanek gas chamber issue: If we take *Pressac's comments and then factor in the doors that don't lock, the doors that open INTO the gas chamber, the doors with latches that can be manipulated from both the outside AND the inside, the window in gas chamber 1, the room inside gas chamber 1, the lack of any Zyklon B induction hole in gas chamber 3, the lack of any Zyklon B traces in gas chamber 2 (which DOES have a "Zyklon B induction hole"), the heavy blue stains on the OUTSIDE of the building, and the location of the building, at the bottom of a hill, at the opposite end of the camp from the crematorium, is it reasonable to suggest that these rooms were delousing chambers?


** In what can only be considered an unfortunate example of how major disputes between Holocaust historians are shielded from the public, the same room Pressac describes in his book as a "disinfestation gas chamber" is featured in the book "The World Must Know," the official book of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C., written by Museum director Dr. Michael Berenbaum. In that book, Berenbaum describes the room as a HOMICIDAL gas chamber and, what's more, a CASTING of this room was made for display AT THE MUSEUM, as PROOF of the homicidal gas chambers! Thus, in both Berenbaum's book AND in the Museum itself, the ONLY material proof given of homicidal gassings is THIS ROOM, a room Pressac staunchly believes to be a disinfestation gas chamber (in fact, in his Auschwitz book, Pressac actually RIDICULES those who say that this Majdanek room is proof of homicidal gassings, and criticizes everyone from the man who prosecuted Faurisson in France to the Majdanek State Museum personnel for perpetuating a fraud).

But does anyone give a damn that the general public, all the millions, might be receiving fraudulent information? Some might suggest that disputes such as these should be kept private so as not to shake the public's confidence in Holocaust history, or in the Holocaust historians. But don't you think we have a RESPONSIBILITY not to knowingly feed the public falsehoods or unproven claims disguised as unquestioned facts? Don't you think we have a responsibility to be honest about our research? If not, what makes us any different from the "historians" of the Soviet Union, or Hitler's Germany, who knowingly tailored their research to produce a politically expedient conclusion? When the ends begin justifying the means, watch integrity go flying out the window.
As bad as the public misinformation about Majdanek is, the Stalin-esque purging of Pressac's "Auschwitz; Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers" from the official record is worse. This master-work of historiography, once loudly heralded in the press (see enclosed clippings), is NOW nowhere to be found when references to Pressac are made. A recent article in "Publishers Weekly," detailing a forthcoming U.S. Holocaust Museum book containing 29 original essays from Holocaust scholars including Berenbaum and Pressac, not only neglects to mention Pressac's gas chamber book, but seems to suggest that Pressac's conversion from revisionist to gas chamber believer came only recently, as he was researching his just-published "slim volume" about the Auschwitz crematorium. The entire period of the 1980's, which Pressac spent researching his gas chamber book after his "conversion", is omitted.
Yet scholars around the world continue to use Pressac's gas chamber book (if they're lucky enough to have one of the few copies), mainly because, even if one disagrees with Pressac's conclusions, his book is STILL the best (and the only) single source for the blueprints, construction slips, alteration plans, and inter-office communiques regarding the Auschwitz "gas chambers".
Neither side in this debate agrees entirely with Pressac...but for the gas chamber supporters, his book is an embarrassment because it IS so thorough. It is the most thorough work yet produced about the gas chambers, yet Pressac cannot find that elusive objective proof of gassings. So now, apparently, the historians have just decided to pretend the book doesn't exist. I've always referred to the Pressac gas chamber book as the most popular book that never existed!


*[Pressac was paid to research the alleged gas chambers - revisionist research has blown him out of the water]

As we now can see, as Hannover always says, "the liars can't keep their lies straight". Scumbag Berenbaum fumbles all over Pressac. The results? Lies coming home to roost.
"The coward threatens when he is safe".
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lamprecht and 5 guests