aemathisphd wrote:This would all be very nice if it were true, but alas, it is not.
Here are the conditions for a typical delousing: A room with its furniture, empty of human beings, would be exposed to hydrogen cyanide escaping from Zyklon-B carrier, as the instructions recommended, for the course of 24 hours. This would allow for the carrier to release all the HCN therein and for the gas to then dissipate, making it safe to then enter the room.
Such conditions would necessarily leave serious amounts of HCN on the walls. In chambers specifically built for delousing, this would also account for deposits of Prussian blue on the walls.
Here are the conditions for a typical homocidal gassing: A room bereft of furniture, but filled with human beings, would be exposed to a smaller amount of Zyklon-B. Because the temperature in the room would be perhaps as much as 20 degrees higher (Celsius) and because there would be considerably more humidity in the room, the result would be a quicker release of gas. Because less cyanide is needed to kill humans than lice, the required exposure time would be significantly decreased. And because the gas chambers had forced ventilation, or at the very least because the Sonderkommando wore gas masks, the rooms could be re-entered quickly and the bodies removed. This would leave relatively little cyanide residue on the walls. Nevertheless, the cyanide is there.
There is no canard here, ladies and gentlemen. This is simple physical chemistry, as laid out in Green's several reports on Auschwitz.
Note that David Irving withdrew Germar Rudolf's expert affidavit in the application for leave for appeal in Irving v. Lipstadt. (Irving similarly vacated Ruth Polanska-Palmer's affidavit when Robert Jan van Pelt filed his affidavit.)
I am open to fielding questions on this, but I would appreciate not being dogpiled. Thanks in advance, and thanks to the powers that be for allowing me into the Revisionist Forum.
Have a great day.
Excuse me for being a technical ignoramous as far as this subject is concerned, but wasn't it the case that Leuchter and Rudolf found that there was little or no evidence of the poison gas being found embedded in the walls of the supposed gas chambers? (This is. of course, in relation to the disinfection gas chambers, in which even today, I think, there is evidence of Zyclon B going right through the walls, so that, in absolute terms, there can really be no comparasion today as regards how much Zyclon B was needed to supposedly exterminate humans, and the amount that would have been used periodically to fumigate the contested morgues.) Therefore what Andrew is asserting is beside the point. Or was it the case that more significant amounts of Zyclon B were found in what the revisionists would say were the walls of the morgues. There would surely have to be disinfection in any case with the Zyclon B, especially in the morgues; and were there any amount of Zyclon B traces found in other buildings which had nothing to do with the supposed homicidal gassings?
It is interesting to see Andrew posting in the TRF and I would hope that it is evidence of a more liberal turn of mind of those who control the forum, which is surely in their interest, if they want to be taken seriously. Therefore, provided everyone makes an effort to keep to the rules as they are actually presented, and no special favouritism is shown to particular individuals, then it should all work quite well, no matter what the truth of the "Holocaust" is.