Germania wrote: can you blame the prosecution??? they came to this after invesigating the case,dont you think so???
Theoretically yes, I would agree.
I always get a strange taste in my mouth about anything by the German courts in connection with Holocaust and Nazi crimes .
whats the source??? private conversation of scheidl with erdmann??? if so,scheidl surly asked her about gassing and she doesnt seem to have denied it, dont you think???
and see, you cite hearsy as prove for faked trial,this is not revisionist standard!!! this is not acceptable,sailor!
My source is the link which I quoted in connection with Scheidl’s quote about euthanasia in concentration camps.
He did not specify his source. Erdmann might have told him. Or he may have gotten it from the trial protocol.
It does not seem absurd to me that prosecutors or police officers during pre-interrogations try to browbeat or frighten the accused in order to get confessions. And the nurses were probably in their 60’s at the time of the trial, they were just plain scared. Especially in Germany. Not difficult to imagine at all.
Were these euthanasia trials fake? Explain.
And I am not a revisionist, I am a skeptical observer of the Jewish Holocaust story. I am a retired engineer, not a historian.
what she did??? what prove is there that she said something told her by the prosecution???
i see no prove that the trial was not correct.in fact all accused were aquitted...
I have no access to the trial protocols.
And maybe the nurses were acquitted. They served the purpose.
Was the German people also acquitted?