Should Iran Imprison Its Holocaust Believers?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10001
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Should Iran Imprison Its Holocaust Believers?

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 4 years ago (Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:58 am)

A witty look at the absurdity of the 'holocau$t' myth. I just rec'd this today and pasted it in, apologies for irregular spacing.

Comments welcomed.

I love the phrase:
" holocaust occupied territory"

- Hannover

Should Iran Imprison Its Holocaust Affirmers?

Today the sacred mystery of the holocaust is the only religious dogma enforced by
international criminal sanctions. Congratulations are in order for the Church of the
Holocaust headquartered in anti-Christian Israel with bishoprics, rabbinates,
prisons, and a jewdiciary throughout the formerly Christian White world.
Holocaustianity has replaced the death of Jesus with Auschwitz and his Resurrection
with the founding of Israel. And currently Gentile stooges fall all over themselves
trying to "outjew" one another with pathetic protestations of fidelity to the
new slave faith for the holocaustofried.

Now the Iranian President ups and spoils the stodgy solemnity by branding the
holyhoax a....well, hoax. President Ahmadinedshad has opened a hornet's nest simply
by suggesting that an international commission should seriously investigate whether
the emperor really has any clothes. Iran offered to send scientists and technicians
to Awshucks to do on-site forensic investigations. The Polish government was,
thereby, given a golden opportunity to earn loads of foreign currency by allowing in
high-powered oligarchs from the Holocaust Industry to defend their fable. Now why
would the Polish Prime Minister bruskly reject the Iranian proposal to have an
international commission thoroughly refute [or perhaps confirm] the earlier findings
of the Leuchter and Rudolf Reports? The question answers itself. Or as they say in
law schools: Res ipsa loquitur.

At any rate, there is a further card Iran can play. Let's call it the "Great
Auschwitz Trial" card in reference to a same-named trial held in Frankfurt in the
early 1970s. That earlier Awshucks Show Trial and kangaroo court was a major
milestone in holocaustofrying Germany into a HOG [Holocaust Obsessed Government]. A
Teheran Auschwitz Trial can play a key role in curing the Western world of its
hoaxopsychosis.

A trial of some sort is much better than a purely academic holocaust conference for
at least three reasons. Firstly, the Western governments will not permit their
foremost experts and scholars to attend any conference in the Muslim world. Many top
revisionist experts are in prison, have had their passports confiscated, have been
severely beaten physically, or placed under the threat of death by jooish
para-military death squads. Examples are: 1. Rudolf, Zuendel, Verbeke, et al. are in
prison; 2. Mahler is passportless; Faurisson has been savagely beaten several times
by jooish terrorists; David Cole was threatened with death after his magnificient
video on the Awshucks Labor Camp proved to be an incisive "the emperor has no
clothes" expose. Secondly, the Western joosmedia will vomit out their spleen,
bile, filth, and lies on any country that hosts such a conference and the
learning-impaired pubics will swallow the black propaganda and WMD [Weapons of Mass
Deception] just like they sucked up the fables about Sadddam's WMD
and Osamu's al-CIA-duh. Thirdly, a trial has a certain PR value in international law. Of course, the UAssA and its puppet master
care not a whit about law but are concerned about image. But any judicial proceeding
is more authoritative than an academic conference. Therefore, some sort of judicial
process [civil or criminal] is much to be preferred.

Now there happens to be a Jewish community of c. 30,000 in Iran and their self-chosen
leaders have done what the Jewish elite always does, i.e. betray the basic interests
of the Jewish sheeple. Teheran's elite Jewry has protested their president's
statement denying the holocaust and have, thereby, put the Awshucks question squarely
on the Iranian domestic agenda. Of course, the only way to properly address such a
horrendous criminal accusation as the holocaust story is some judicial procedure
using forensic evidence. The films of a Spielberg or Lanzmann are completely
irrelevant in addressing the factual basis of the Jewish blood libel against Germans,
i.e. hoaxoco$t And the psychotic ramblings of an Alley Weasel are powerful evidence
against the established Church of the Holocaust because his testimonials are either
physically impossible nonsense or contradict the currently prevailing version of the
hoax. Alley is still living in a time warp in which the fable had it that Jews wer
e roasted alive in humongous open air barbecue pits. Absolutely nobody even among the
weirdest holocaustomaniacs peddles such bullshit today.

A Teheran Auschwitz Judiciary would investigate the specific claims raised by Teheran
Jews. Such a trail [or grand jury or hearing] would, therefore, strictly be an
internal Iranian affair. It would be better if the proceedings were civil rather than
criminal because a criminal trial would just duplicate the German and Austrian
stupidity of imprisoning and abducting people for mere opinions. The Galileo Affair
supposedly cured us of such idiocies

The hopefully soon to open Teheran proceedings would differ from the German hoaxoco$t
spectacle in the following ways: The German judges dogmatically assume the holocaust
and will not let the accused defend himself in any way. Any defense is treated as
holocaust denial and, therefore, [Can you believe this?] proves the defendant guilty:
"You say you have scientific evidence that the murder of 30,000 Jews at Baby Yar
was technically impossible? Five years in the slammer!" It all makes Stalin's
show trials seem like models of idealized Anglo-Saxon justice. In the Teheran
proceedings no specific person would be the central focus, but the Auschwitz fable
itself would be examined. The Germans forbid any forensic evidence which could
contradict the holocaust as "obvious public knowledge." The Iranians will
demand forensic evidence and expert analysis and should invite internationally
qualified forensic investigators to testify. Any holocaust affirmers, who choose to
testify and are willing to risk open cross examination, will have an open forum in which they can put up or....

Since Iranian Jews are citizens of their government, they have duties and rights. If
they can be accused of something in connection with their protests, then they have
legal rights to defend themselves in their country's courts and judicial forums.
Moreover, all the world from ABC to ZNN will be minutely examining any moves Iran
makes, so any generally accepted human rights of the protesting Jews will be
scrupulously observed. There is no reason to believe that Iran will act like the
German and Austrian neo-Inquisitions. Let Germany and Austria imprison holocaust
deniers! Iran should only cross examine those holocaust affirmers who had the
chutzpah to shoot off their mouth.

My personal opinion is that Iran's elite Jewry has made an enormous mistake in
turning the whole holocaust issue into an Iranian domestic issue and, thereby,
running the risk of being forced to defend the hoaxoco$t narrative before a forum
outside holocaust occupied territory. There is no need to imprison these elite Jewish
idiots, but their chutzpah and inability to shut up opens up a golden opportunity for
an unprejudiced forensic investigation of all the issues revisionists have been
hammering away at.

If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Tank
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:31 pm

Postby Tank » 1 decade 4 years ago (Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:40 pm)

One is measured by the company one keeps.


I would not be so quick to fall in line behind the Iranians.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10001
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 4 years ago (Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:31 pm)

Tank says:
One is measured by the company one keeps.
I would not be so quick to fall in line behind the Iranians.

Sorry, you have that all backwards. Iran is falling in line behind 'holocau$t' Revisionists.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

kk
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:24 pm

Postby kk » 1 decade 4 years ago (Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:51 pm)

Yes!

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10001
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 4 years ago (Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:02 am)

Again, Tank said:
One is measured by the company one keeps.
I would not be so quick to fall in line behind the Iranians.

I commented:
Sorry, you have that all backwards. Iran is falling in line behind 'holocau$t' Revisionists.

A follow up:
The Iranians have learned from Revisionists just how full of air the 'holocau$t' truly is. That's bad news for judeo-supremacist domination.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Postby Moderator » 1 decade 4 years ago (Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:14 am)

I've deleted 2 posts which ignored the subject of this thread.
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests