Claude Lanzmann on the 'barber of Treblinka'

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
simon1003
Member
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:06 pm

Claude Lanzmann on the 'barber of Treblinka'

Postby simon1003 » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:25 pm)

Claude Lanzmann has written a gushing tribute to Raul Hilberg, here - http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081007G.shtml

Interestingly, he tells us how the famous barber Abraham Bomba may not be the reliable eyewitness as portayed in his documentary:

"In "Shoah," there are witnesses, and that's another way to make what happened tangible. One may dispute what, for example, the Treblinka hairdresser relates."

Laurentz Dahl
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 981
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Somewhere in Europe

Postby Laurentz Dahl » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:32 pm)

Yet, less than a decade ago, Lanzmann stated that he vastly preferred the testimony of Bomba to the writings of Pressac...

Interesting admission to come from a certified nutjob such as Lanzmann.

User avatar
ASMarques
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:47 pm

Postby ASMarques » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:41 pm)

So Lanzmann thinks that "one may dispute what, for example, the Treblinka hairdresser relates," in his own Shoa movie. Well, why then didn't one do just that, when one did the movie? The obvious answer: because one didn't wish to exercise one's intellectual faculties, preferring instead to contribute to the vast propaganda holoshlock for power and profit. And there you have the "Holocaust" in a nutshell...


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest