F.P. Berg / 'Overwhelming' Evidence? / The Big Lie tactic

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

F.P. Berg / 'Overwhelming' Evidence? / The Big Lie tactic

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 3 years ago (Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:56 pm)

The laughable 'holocaust' story is The Big Lie tactic to the extreme. But regardless of how many times nonsense is repeated, it is still nonsense and no one can change that fact. Here we have Fritz Berg on that very point.

- Hannover


The evidence to support the holocaust claims is miniscule, and false, and not at all “overwhelming.” But, the ongoing campaign to make the holocaust evidence appear “overwhelming” is awesome and ongoing. It is holocaust propaganda itself which is “overwhelming”–but NOT the evidence. The “holocaust” is a big lie repeated many times.

When Robert Wolfe was still the long-time director of the military branch of the National Archives in Washington, DC, he held a small conference in the late 1970's in which he admitted openly that the “evidence” to support the holocaust claims “fits into a small shoe box.” He then reached his hand to a small pile of papers from which he took one version of the famous “Statement of Kurt Gerstein.” That ridiculous piece of “evidence” is still the best evidence there is for the “holocaust.” Since that small conference in Wolfe's office, a huge holocaust museum has been constructed in Washington, DC –but it contains nothing better than Wolfe had in his hands years earlier. That museum is a monument to non-evidence and human stupidity.

Victims who have been killed (not merely living patients who have been poisoned) with carbon monoxide or cyanide are, with rare exceptions, marked with a distinct, even “characteristic” red coloring over most of their bodies. The exceptions are the corpses of people, generally old and/or infirm, who died quickly before the carboxyhemoglobin or oxyhemoglobin levels could rise high enough to effect the color of the corpse. Let those who contend otherwise try to find photographic evidence from the forensic medical literature to support the holocaust claims about “blue” or “bluish” or even “green” corpses. They will find, instead, only more evidence that the holocaust story is a monumental hoax. If the holocaust is not a hoax, then surely all of the forensic medical textbooks and atlases must be rewritten to include the “overwhelming” evidence from the holocaust. We may as well turn science on its head. Why not?

Some Conclusions about the "Holocaust"

The holocaust story is racist filth. The alleged gassings never happened. Life-saving measures which kept people alive have been turned instead into devices for mass extermination. Actual mass murders committed by the Allies have been blamed instead on the Germans. The German people deserve the same human rights as everyone else–including the right to dispute all holocaust-related claims regardless of who might claim to be offended, even if they are Jews. The continuing imprisonment and censorship of revisionists are crimes against humanity. All of Germany's political leaders today deserve to be severely punished for their bigotry and crimes against their own people.

Friedrich Paul Berg

Learn everything at www.nazigassings.com

Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Postby Haldan » 1 decade 3 years ago (Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:23 pm)

To be honest, I'm actually a little offended that I ever thought I would be dumb enough to buy into their drama to begin with, but what can a person do? I was indoctrinated with the "holocaust" propaganda at a early age just as everyone else was--and it isn't exactly like they teach us to think critically either.

-haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 3 years ago (Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:42 am)

To the topic I can tell something from experiences on forums. When it came to "The Holocaust" its defenders claimed that it was "the best documented genocide in human history". In deed there are many documents dealing with the "third Reich" and also camps and the treatment of Jews. But what does that prove? It is just too funny that amongst those millions of documents, they did not find a single one proving homicidal gassings in Auschwitz.

User avatar
TruthSeeker
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: Lebanon

Postby TruthSeeker » 1 decade 3 years ago (Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:07 am)

Hektor wrote:It is just too funny that amongst those millions of documents, they did not find a single one proving homicidal gassings in Auschwitz.

Yes.. When in dire need for 'evidence', the Big Book of Lies recommends urgent resort to claims like: "the Nazis talked about a "final solution" which really cannot mean anything other than mass-murder of the Jews by gassing, for which no evidence is needed because as you can see, where else could 6 million Jews have disappeared to??" :lol:

TruthSeeker
Lebanon

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 3 years ago (Sat Sep 22, 2007 12:53 pm)

TruthSeeker wrote:
Hektor wrote:...not find a single one proving homicidal gassings in Auschwitz.

Yes.. When in dire need for 'evidence', the Big Book of Lies recommends urgent resort to claims like: "the Nazis talked about a "final solution" which really cannot mean anything other than mass-murder of the Jews by gassing, for which no evidence is needed because as you can see, where else could 6 million Jews have disappeared to??" :lol:
...
What is the last fallacy called? Argument from ignorance or something like that. Ever noticed what "irrefutable" lines of arguments Holocaust believers pull out of their hats?! Irrefutable, because these lines are void of decent logic... The other one is:"Are you saying all these survivors and witnesses are lying??" Implying that there are many people claiming to have observed homicidal gassings. Of course it is not like that and then there is the problem of the many "survivors", which begs more then one question :D .

User avatar
TruthSeeker
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: Lebanon

Postby TruthSeeker » 1 decade 3 years ago (Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:03 pm)

Hektor wrote:What is the last fallacy called?

I believe it is called Holohoaxism. :roll:

Ever noticed what "irrefutable" lines of arguments Holocaust believers pull out of their hats?! Irrefutable, because these lines are void of decent logic... The other one is:"Are you saying all these survivors and witnesses are lying??" Implying that there are many people claiming to have observed homicidal gassings. Of course it is not like that and then there is the problem of the many "survivors", which begs more then one question :D .

Logic? What's that? It's neo-Nazism and anti-Semitism under disguise!! :roll:
In the meantime don't forget to boycott German-made cars -- but not submarines and certainly not the billions of dollars in "compensation" that are being milked from Germany to this day. :x

TruthSeeker
Lebanon

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 3 years ago (Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:37 pm)

"Are you saying all these survivors and witnesses are lying??"

Are you saying that all the thousands of 'survivors, witnesses, and confessors' to witchcraft & sorcery are lying?

Are you saying that all the thousands of 'survivors and witnesses' to alien UFO abductions are lying?

Are you saying that all the thousands 'witnesses' to visions of the Virgin Mary are lying?

Elan Steinberg, Executive Director of the World Jewish Congress when discussing accusations of atrocities against Germans:
"The problem is, when you investigate something as serious as this, you can not rely on eyewitnesses who, even with the best of intentions, with the best of intentions, can give you misleading information".

60 Minutes' - November 24, 1993

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 3 years ago (Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:25 pm)


Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 877
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Postby Breker » 1 decade 3 years ago (Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:16 pm)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNhFxV79_Kc

I surmise that there is not a single picture in that presentation which proves the "Holocaust" as the legend is told. The 'gas chamber' they attempt to depict has been effortlessly denounced as the fake that it is. We even notice pictures of typhus victims from Belsen, not Auschwitz, that have been added to the attempt to deceive.
Breker


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Turpitz, Vukdar and 8 guests