1944 Auschwitz studies compared to 2007 Iran studies

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
theTRUTH
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:50 pm

1944 Auschwitz studies compared to 2007 Iran studies

Postby theTRUTH » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:11 am)

"The manner in which the Americans relate to the intelligence report on Iran is similar to the way in which they viewed those reports they received during the Holocaust on railways transporting hundreds of thousands of Jews to their death at Auschwitz."
Minister Yitzhak Cohen of Shas during a security cabinet meeting Sunday morning on the Iranian nuclear issue.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 95,00.html

In 2006 revisionist research forced the Holocaust Lobby to admit the Americans and British each conducted their own independent studies into whether mass murders were occurring at Auschwitz, but with their rebuttal that the studies could not determine if mass murders were occurring.

In fact these “studies”, which disappeared post-WW2, had to have been very well researched and comprehensive because of political pressure from England and the U.S. to determine once and for all what was occurring at Auschwitz to either silence the rumors of “death camps”, which would stop the planned bombing of Auschwitz buildings and railways, or verify the rumors which would generate the bombing order.

The same way the Germans did a comprehensive study on Auschwitz the Americans have done a thorough study on Iran’s nuclear program. Now the Israeli press will try to influence western and U.S. public opinion against the study’s results, however in 1945 the Auschwitz studies disappeared whereas the 2007 report is public knowledge.
"Israel must invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the methods of provocation..." Moshe Sharett, Israeli's Foreign Minister ('48-'54), & Prime Minister ('54-'56).

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:05 am)

That's a good point. One may ask the following. Who where the people through which we "know" about "Holocaust atrocities"? To my knowledge this was, said plainy, the propaganda departments of the Allies.

On the other hand the intelligence department - who are paid to find out about facts - should also have some reports. What is their content and findings?

theTRUTH
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:50 pm

Postby theTRUTH » 1 decade 2 years ago (Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:26 am)

In 1943 and '44 the British and U.S. governments probably each did a number of their own independent studies on whether mass murders were occurring at Auschwitz and it's surrounding satellite camps, and although the studies disappeared after 1944, their conclusions had to have been there was not one piece of credible evidence indicating inmates were being murdered because not one bridge, rail line, or building was bombed.
"Israel must invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the methods of provocation..." Moshe Sharett, Israeli's Foreign Minister ('48-'54), & Prime Minister ('54-'56).


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests