The Hitler Book , Henrik Eberle and Matthias Uhl

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Lupa
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:41 am

The Hitler Book , Henrik Eberle and Matthias Uhl

Postby Lupa » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:53 am)

The last book I have read is this :

Image

"El informe Hitler"

its the spanish translation of :

Image

Henrik Eberle and Matthias Uhl (authors-editors)

Its the result of the interrogations made to Linge and Günsche , adyudants of Adolf Hitler, by the NKVD from 1945 to 1949.

The book has three parts, a long introduction , made by the german authors-editors to put the reader in context of the motivation of the Hitler-file.

The Hitler-file itself only with the comments of the NKVD ,

and a long comment where the german authors-editors explain some of the affirmations and errors made in the file.

It is astonishing, how the german authors affirm in the introduction and in their comment that Hitler was aware of the Holocaust.

The Hitler-file itself doesn´t mention in no way this point. Its more, it didn´t mention "Jew", neither Auschwitz.

In one moment the NKVD mentions , in the words of Linge and Günsche, mobile gas-installations (Aka Gasvans, but without using the term , used in Russia). The mentioned athrocities limit to soviet prisoners of war and no more. They discribe also the killing of Ucranians at Vinnitsa. The only concentration camp mentioned in the whole file is Buchenwald.

The Hitler-file really is not able to sustain the holocaust-version , against the affirmation of the german authors-editors.

:wink:

MrNobody
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:54 am

Postby MrNobody » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:03 am)

Lupa wrote:
It is astonishing, how the german authors affirm in the introduction and in their comment that Hitler was aware of the Holocaust.

The Hitler-file itself doesn´t mention in no way this point. Its more, it didn´t mention "Jew", neither Auschwitz.


The Hitler-file really is not able to sustain the holocaust-version , against the affirmation of the german authors-editors.

:wink:


It's one thing to be brainwashed, it's quite another to be a brainwashed self-hater.
bloody space wasting air thieves!
Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Kastastrophe in die andere stürzt.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9890
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:29 am)

Given the repercussions of saying anything other than 'Hitler knew', what can one expect of those 'interrogated' by the communists? Also, we should simply consider the source, the NKVD. How much of this was actually the words of Eberle and Uhl. Were they put on trial? Were they cross examined?

Hitler knew about the so called holocaust, but his adjutants never mention Auschwitz or the impossible Zyklon-B gas chambers that are alleged there? How does that work?

As for the laughable & bizarro 'gas vans', what else can one expect when considering that the NKVD (later called the KGB) interrogators originated that lie? The NKVD by it's very nature was a propaganda arm of communism.

Notice the alleged mass graves are never shown. Notice that impossibility of the storyline is not somehow made possible.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Lupa
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:41 am

Postby Lupa » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:42 am)

Hannover wrote:Given the repercussions of saying anything other than 'Hitler knew', what can one expect of those 'interrogated' by the communists? Also, we should simply consider the source, the NKVD. How much of this was actually the words of Eberle and Uhl. Were they put on trial? Were they cross examined?

Hitler knew about the so called holocaust, but his adjutants never mention Auschwitz or the impossible Zyklon-B gas chambers that are alleged there? How does that work?

As for the laughable & bizarro 'gas vans', what else can one expect when considering that the NKVD (later called the KGB) interrogators originated that lie? The NKVD by it's very nature was a propaganda arm of communism.

Notice the alleged mass graves are never shown. Notice that impossibility of the storyline is not somehow made possible.

- Hannover


Eberle and Uhl are the german editors which found the Hitler-file in the soviet archives. The interrogated prisoners are Heinz Linge and Otto Günsche.

In the introduction one can see the motivation of this file.

The file was elaborated for Stalin´s eyes only , not for the politburo.

So the interrogators tried to give on one hand a true story, but on the other hand not contradict the official partyline.

So one can think that the file has a lot of omissions , but only few inventions from the interrogators.

Stalin would not have been amused if the interrogators give him a fary tale file.

:wink:

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9890
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:52 pm)

The interrogated prisoners are Heinz Linge and Otto Günsche.

Thanks for the correction. Points still stand.

I think Irving cites them in his 'Hitler's War', a book which seriously pissed off the judeo-supremacists.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Lupa
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:41 am

Postby Lupa » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:11 pm)

Hannover wrote:
The interrogated prisoners are Heinz Linge and Otto Günsche.

Thanks for the correction. Points still stand.

I think Irving cites them in his 'Hitler's War', a book which seriously pissed off the judeo-supremacists.

- Hannover


Heinz Linge (born 23 March 1913; died 9 March 1980)
was a valet at Adolf Hitler's headquarters.

Otto Günsche (September 24, 1917 – October 2, 2003) was a Sturmbannführer in the SS and was a member of Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler before he become Adolf Hitler's personal adjutant.

Heinz Linge spoke with authors of Hitlers Biographies , maybe he spoke also with Irving.

Otto Günsche was the guy who incinerated the body of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun in the garden of the Reichskanzlei on April 30 , 1945.

Otto Günsche never spoke with nobody about his role in the story, with the only exception of the NKVD. That was the reason why I bought the book at the same moment when I saw it.

:wink:

User avatar
Agrarian Reformer
Member
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:16 pm

Postby Agrarian Reformer » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:14 pm)

Read Joachim Hoffmann's "Stalin's War of Extermination". The NKVD was an apparatus for the mass extermination of Germans and Russians on both sides of the war. Sort of like what the judeo-supremacists accuse the Germans of except much bigger and for real.
"Anybody can make an atrocity film if they take corpses out of their graves and then show a tractor shoving them back in again." - Hermann Göring

NovyMir
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:57 am

Postby NovyMir » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:48 pm)

Using our own criteria as the basis for accepting the truth of an historical event or claim, I think the word "alleged", or "claimed" should be qualified into this sentence: It is alleged that... "Otto Günsche was the guy who incinerated the body of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun in the garden of the Reichskanzlei on April 30 , 1945. "
That's all.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests