It's important to make the point that the "Holocaust" is not supposed to be an ordinary set of mass executions of the kind that was unfortunately practiced by both sides during the Second World War.
The "Holocaust" (TM) -- the alleged one and only inimitable greatest crime in history -- is supposed do be the attempted extermination of the Jews, resulting in 6 million dead, most of them industrially chain-murdered in the gas chambers of the "extermination camps," not a few mass graves with bones in it in the midst of war zones.
How odd that no vestiges of this gigantic "Holocaust" of the Jews by the Germans can be found, when such apparently obscure killings as the alleged ones near Gvozdavka, in the Odessa region occupied by Rumanian forces, seem to leave detectable evidence. Of course, it would be interesting to know the composition of the pits. What evidence is there that the executed people were non-combatant civilian Jews mass-murdered in an "extermination operation"? Are there, for exemple any children among the victims?
It should be stressed that revisionists don't deny "mass executions" tout-court. For instance, one of the (legal) attributions of the Eisatzgruppen was precisely to execute people. The execution of unlawful combatants is a common practice in any war, and all the more so when a large scale partisan war is being fought, following closely the upheavals of one of the most savage revolutionary civil wars ever visited on any population.
It's also interesting to note that the possible exactions committed at this particular place must have been committed by Rumanians, not Germans. See, for instance:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19213646/
"In November 1941, Rumanian troops allied with the Nazis set up a concentration camp in Gvozdavka-1, where about 5,000 Jews perished, according to regional Jewish leaders. Jews were brought here from several regions of Ukraine, as well as from what is now Moldova, they said."
No prejudice on my part, but one is reminded of what Léon Degrelle wrote about the undisciplined Rumanians: "The Rumanian soldiers had unquestionably performed many exploits since 1941. They had liberated Bessarabia and conquered Odessa. They had fought gloriously in the Crimea and the Donets. But they had a savage nature and massacred their prisonners, thus bringing about reprisals in which everyone suffered. Their massacres were not only savage, they were stupid. [...] Unfortunately, the Rumanians, in spite of our pleading, continued to massacre all the Russians who presented themselves at their posts." (Degrelle, Campaign in Russia, IHR 1985, pages 74-75)
How do we know the remains in that pit did not result from a massacre such as the ones Degrelle described, instead of the "Holocaust" of the Jews?
Alas, no similar testimony of Degrelle, who always seems quite ready to speak of the exactions committed by both sides, about any frontline systematic massacres of Jews. Quite the contrary: as a Roman Catholic he even wrote to the pope, in the post-war years, on the absurdities of the alleged "Holocaust" allegations.