'Name & Proof of One Person gassed at Auschwitz' ad runs

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10338
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

'Name & Proof of One Person gassed at Auschwitz' ad runs

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:39 pm)

Elegant simplicity at it's finest as CODOH's Bradley Smith runs his challenge in university newspapers:
"Can you provide, with proof, the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz?"

Those that profit from the absurd 'holocaust' religion are not going to like that at all ... since they cannot answer the challenge. Read on.

- Hannover

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:
Bradley R. Smith
PO Box 439016
San Ysidro, CA 92143
Phone: 209 682 5327
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.codoh.com

==========

19 February 2009

Can you provide, with proof, the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz?


The Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust is running an announcement in campus newspapers nationwide asking students to help in identifying one professor on their campus who is able to provide, with proof, the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz

To date the announcement has been run by:

The Poly Post, California State University Pomona
The Cardinal, Louisville University
The Sign Post, Weber State University
The Daily Lobo, University of New Mexico
The News, Murray State University
The Western Courier, Western University of Illinois
The Bottom Line, Frostburg State University
The Exponent, Montana State University
The Daily Titan, California State University Fullerton
The Eco, University of Central Arkansas
The Free Press, Southern Maine University
The Current, St. Louis University Missouri
The Lumberjack, Humboldt State University
The Jambar, Youngstown State University.

At every university where we have the story the editorial staff was attacked for having run an ad that asks my “One person, with proof. . . “ question. At the same time, we have no evidence that journalism faculty on even one campus stood with the student journalists to defend their decision to publish an ad that, by merely posing a question, encourages a free exchange of ideas.

In every instance we know of academics routinely sided with those, both on and off campus, who demanded that the ad be pulled from the paper, or acted out the role of “bystanders” leaving the student journalists to hang and twist in the wind. In some instances the editors were pressured by the environment on their campus and the lack of support by their own faculty advisors, not only to withdraw the ad but to apologize for having run it in the first place.

At the Poly Post at CSU Pomona, once the ad was withdrawn under pressure, advertising sent us a copy of its advertising policy. It reads in part: “Although every ad is judged on its individual merits, the newspaper is disinclined to run those that promote hate, racism, or historical revisionism.”

Asking for the name of one person, with proof, who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz then is an attempt to “revise” history. With regard to a free exchange of ideas, how are we to distinguish between professors who teach journalism in American universities from those who teach journalism in lands where the state is ruled by tyrannical fascists or communists?
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:40 am)

Hannover wrote:Elegant simplicity at it's finest as CODOH's Bradley Smith runs his challenge in university newspapers:
"Can you provide, with proof, the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz?"

Those that profit from the absurd 'holocaust' religion are not going to like that at all ... since they cannot answer the challenge. Read on.
...
If they are smart, they'll come up with the names of Jews allegedly killed (gassed) in Natzweiler.
http://www.die-namen-der-nummern.de/
http://www.die-namen-der-nummern.de/htm ... afien.html

More then 10 years ago, I did ask Ken McVey that question. He wasn't that smart - All I got was an ad hominem.

Inquisitive
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 11:02 am

Postby Inquisitive » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:11 am)

Asking for the name of one person, with proof, who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz then is an attempt to “revise” history.


How outrageous can you get? History is dead then.

User avatar
Occam's Razor
Member
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:45 pm

Postby Occam's Razor » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:07 am)

Hektor wrote:If they are smart, they'll come up with the names of Jews allegedly killed (gassed) in Natzweiler.


Why would that be smart?

Bradley Smith asked for the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz, with proof.

What you have are names, without proof, from Natzweiler.

It's difficult to prove that a delousing chamber could not have been used for killing people, but the burden of proof is on the accuser. Since delousing chambers were normally used for delousing clothes, the only reasonable assumption is that clothes with lice were gassed at Natzweiler, not humans.

Do you think the claims that people were gassed at Natzweiler are credible, and do you think that there is convincing evidence, that would qualify as "proof" for Bradley Smith's question (if he had asked for names, with proof, from Natzweiler)? If you think so, feel free to start a new thread on gassings at Natzweiler.

I don't think that you believe in gassings at Natzweiler, but new readers who come to this forum could be a bit confused if they read your comment... :D

Bradley Smith's question asks for a name, with prove, for a gassing at Auschwitz. Simply names with claims, without proof, or from other camps, won't do it. Auschwitz was the alleged center of the holocaust, it's a synonym for the holocaust, so this question concentrates on the most important place, with a simple task. Shouldn't be too difficult for the believers... :D

User avatar
Kiwichap
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:54 pm
Location: New Zealand

Postby Kiwichap » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:36 pm)

Name: - Benyamin Glickdestein. [1844 - ?] (Uncle Benny)

Proof: - Last seen boarding a train in Paris (1944).

Is there a prize?
There was no holocaust.

Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

User avatar
ClaudiaRothenbach
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:16 pm

Postby ClaudiaRothenbach » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:36 pm)

They killed 6 M Jews and burned the bodies.

After that, later they noticed that they would need 86 skelettons for a assemblage. Therefor they killed 86 Jews additionally.

Not for the genocide but for the assemblage. :oops:

What a crap! :lol:
"Everything has already been said, but not yet by everyone." - Karl Valentin

User avatar
PotPie
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:04 am
Location: Here

Postby PotPie » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:04 am)

I can't believe anyone is actually running this announcement. Campus newspapers are noted for their political correctness and left-wing bias and censorship. Leftists are willing to question every aspect of history, except that which makes leftists look bad; consequently, the holocaust is a big sacred cow.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:45 am)

Occam's Razor wrote:
Hektor wrote:If they are smart, they'll come up with the names of Jews allegedly killed (gassed) in Natzweiler.


Why would that be smart?
It would be smarter then obviously evading that question, as Kenneth McVey from the Nizkor Project did.

Occam's Razor wrote:Bradley Smith asked for the name of one person who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz, with proof.

What you have are names, without proof, from Natzweiler.
...
Since when does posing a sharply specific question mean that Holocaustians will respond with an answer meeting those specific requirements?
They will come up with the Natzweiler response, simply because it is a response that seemingly has some substance.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests