The unexpected views of four key diplomats on World War II

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

The unexpected views of four key diplomats on World War II

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:11 am)

The Origins of World War II

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events

Just consider the following:


* Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying
“Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”.
(The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

* Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says
“Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.”
(Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

* Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis,
“the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.”
(Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

* Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that
‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’
(Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28 ), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’


Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her,
‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’
But she adds
‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’
etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing.
‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’
(The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes
‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’


Mowrer says
‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’
(pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds
‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’
(pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported:
‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’
(Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes
‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’
(pp238-9).

The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes
‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’
(Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black,
‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’
(p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8 ):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.”
(Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.”
(Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.”
(J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says,
“The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all”
(p.267), and
“Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership”
(p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist
‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’
(Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..”
(p 200).

According to Liddell Hart,
“At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia”
(p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to
“the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”


This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/for-ev ... _3847.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If all this was true: Very, very interesting indeed.
Last edited by Halo on Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:20 am, edited 2 times in total.

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:23 am)

What is going on in the Middle East is a re-run. I keep thinking to myself, here we go again.

User avatar
Älghuvud
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:58 am

Postby Älghuvud » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:50 am)

Halo wrote:The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).


The Nuremberg Laws were imposed two-and-a-half years later. So this cannot have been the reason.
Last edited by Älghuvud on Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:57 am, edited 2 times in total.

Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:47 pm)

Yeah, I think Duke confuses something here:
As far as I know, the "judea declares war"- boykott against germany came first, and was not caused by the nazi repression in form nuremberg laws, in contrast they were the reaction to the "jewish" boycott.

The second part of his sentence (the indirect quote of Hannah Arendt Eichmann) seems to be correct.
(I dont have that book, but I know about the nakba and present day israel...).

Edit:
By using the new atheist exile politics they [the Zionists] provoked and increased anti-Semitism in Europe which led to the Second world War. . . The worldwide boycott against Germany in 1933 and the later all-out declaration of war against Germany, initiated by the Zionist leaders and the World Jewish Congress. . .



— Rabbi Schwartz, New York Times, Sept. 30, 1997

MrNobody
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:54 am

Postby MrNobody » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:48 pm)

Halo wrote:The Origins of World War II

Just consider the following:


* Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying
“Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”.
(The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).



Trust the British to try & blame the US for the War when it was clearly Britain that was, is & remains the progenitor of war in the 20th & 21st century.

It's not without reason that the US had War Plan Red drafted

War Plan Red, also known as the Atlantic Strategic War Plan, was a plan for the United States to make war with Great Britain (the "Red" forces). It was developed by the United States Army during the mid 1920s, approved in May 1930 by the Secretary of War and the Secretary of Navy, updated in 1934-35, and officially withdrawn in 1939, following the outbreak of the Second World War.

The US went as far as commissioning the building of 3 disguised Airbases near the Canadian border at the cost of $57 Million for the purposes of pre-emptive strikes on Canadian air fields.

See it more detail here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Plan_Red

Now compare that with the US War Plan Back.

War Plan Black was conceived as a contingency plan during World War I in case France fell and the Germans attempted to seize French possessions in the Caribbean, or launch an attack on the eastern seaboard. War Plan Black called for the United States to plant mines and have submarines on patrol at sites Germany might seize for a foothold in the Caribbean. It was revised in 1916 to concentrate the main US naval fleet in New England, and from there defend the US from the German navy. Following Germany's defeat in World War I, Plan Black was no longer as important as it once was.

And was never revised beyond that.

Many people are unaware of a very simple fact, there is Greater London, then there is The City of London, the Financial & Economic epicenter of the Jewish controlled Banking in the UK.
The City of London is like the Vatican, a State within a State, with it's own Laws & Police Force, it is from here that the British Empire has waged War on the rest of the World in order to maintain it's Financial Dominance, this isn't a "conspiracy", just listen to the directives coming from PM Brown over the Economic Meltdown being directed towards the White House.
Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Kastastrophe in die andere stürzt.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:31 am)

Oh yeah I heard about the city of london- but didnt know they waged war from there- clears up a lot!

As far as I know there´s 3 such "power centers" that constitute souvereign entities of their own:

City of London
Vatican city
Washington DC

MrNobody
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:54 am

Postby MrNobody » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:11 pm)

When you get right into the history of Europe it all starts to fall into place, First we have the "Seven Years War" which pretty much ended France as a Colonial Power in the Caribbean & the Americas & nearly doubled England's colonial possessions in those same areas.

From this we have the American Revolutionary War, because of the Taxes foisted on the Colonies from the Seven Years War, Sugar, Tea, Rum, Currency, the "Quartering Act" etc

Then we have the French Revolutionary wars which were a threat to Britain's Trade Dominance of Europe, Britain had just entered the industrial revolution & had become Europe's Powerhouse for industry & Manufacture while Europe represented a huge market in trade goods, Europe under Napoleon represented pretty much what the EU is today, Britain financed opposition to Napoleon & in 1806 he instituted the "Continental System" in an attempt to deny Britain access to this market.

skipping ahead a bit we have WWI
Just before the outbreak of WWI, two major events occurred, Germany had completed about two thirds of the Berlin to Baghdad Rail line, completely negating the British Controlled Suez Canal & it's tariffs, at about this time Lord Palmerston encouraged Belgium to become a "Neutral Nation", fully knowing that if any conflict broke out between Germany & France, Germany would have to cross through Belgian territory to attack French Soil, Belgium's "Neutrality" was guaranteed by Britain, forcing her to react to any threat.

20 Year later Poland's "Sovereignty" was guaranteed by, you guessed it Britain & France.

The British "Empire" has always flourished on plundering her colonies of cheap labor & raw materials while leaving those same colonies undeveloped to the point of being backward, India until it's Independence is a prime example of this.

You also begin to understand why the Brits placed such importance on her Navy, not out of fear of invasion, but as a way to impose her tariffs, cutting off trade routes, blockades etc.

It's also always been Britain's foreign Policy to keep Europe off balance, never letting it become truly unified to the point where it rivaled Britain Economically or Politically, it also explains why Germany has twice been targeted for destruction, Germany has always been a progressive, innovative Nation, it is also perfectly placed within Europe forming a hub or nexus with it's road-rail infrastructure & it's industrial Manufacturing base.

If you think today that the EU has finally caught on & caught up, think again, Although the UK is an EU member state, it has never adopted the Euro in fact it negotiated an exemption from adopting it........why?
Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Kastastrophe in die andere stürzt.



Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

Erwachtist
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: Western NY

Postby Erwachtist » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:36 pm)

The matter of the Weimar's rampant inflation always had a ring of suspicion. There was a comment somewhere along the years pertaining to the reason for this that cannot be verified but it sounded reasonable.

After WWI Germany was basically occupied in a financial sense; as the monetary system began a recovery not all the mark printing presses were owned or controlled by the Republic. For the purpose of buying up anything of value within the country certain printing presses were rolling overtime resulting in the "foriegn" ownership of virtually anything of value.

Once the equity of the country had been seized through overprinting, the currency had to be destroyed so that the purchases could be made profitable. Sort of like the Federal Reserve causing depressions in the US, manipulating the stock market, and inflating the currency so that the assets can be bought and controlled.

The phenomenal success of the Jews in establishing themselves in German society was/is not so much their business acumen as it was/is their control of the monetary system.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:49 pm)

Image

It does not tell us specifically why "50,000 Jews gathered in Hyde Park to do a spot of Hun baiting, or who organised such a massive meeting. All it mentions is a "Violent Campaign".

MrNobody
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:54 am

Postby MrNobody » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:04 pm)

Erwachtist wrote:The matter of the Weimar's rampant inflation always had a ring of suspicion. There was a comment somewhere along the years pertaining to the reason for this that cannot be verified but it sounded reasonable.

After WWI Germany was basically occupied in a financial sense; as the monetary system began a recovery not all the mark printing presses were owned or controlled by the Republic. For the purpose of buying up anything of value within the country certain printing presses were rolling overtime resulting in the "foriegn" ownership of virtually anything of value.

Once the equity of the country had been seized through overprinting, the currency had to be destroyed so that the purchases could be made profitable. Sort of like the Federal Reserve causing depressions in the US, manipulating the stock market, and inflating the currency so that the assets can be bought and controlled.

The phenomenal success of the Jews in establishing themselves in German society was/is not so much their business acumen as it was/is their control of the monetary system.


I think that's correct, one of the reasons Hitler nationalized the Banks was to shut down Jewish owned Banks & to transfer the Printing of Money & issue of Credit back to the Government.

We're in this "Economic Crisis" today primarily because Sovereign Governments don't have the ability to issue Credit, it's all done by semi quasi "Corporations" like the US Federal Reserve, The US Gov pays (I think) 5 cents for every Dollar Printed, it's a self perpetuating debt.
Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles und Jalta befreit, die uns schon ein ganzes Jahrhundert lang von einer Kastastrophe in die andere stürzt.



Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

User avatar
Kiwichap
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:54 pm
Location: New Zealand

Postby Kiwichap » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:04 am)

Halo cites (great post by the way) the American Ambassador in Berlin: "“the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…(1938)

Yeah, so, look at the USA (2009), is there anything new under the sun? I don't think so. Poor poor children of the world. Did someone say history is boring? Lets not teach that. What does it take to wake folk up?

MrNobody says: "Trust the British to try & blame the US for the War when it was clearly Britain that was, is & remains the progenitor of war in the 20th & 21st century."

Now hold on pal. Folk have been writin letters to the Queen for I don't know how long. They've queried how could the Jews be re-admitted, against such a Royal Decree. The problem is ThreadNeedle St. Yeah, that bit o' London that's not London at all. Like Wall St. That street thats rippen everybody off! Tis the synagogue of Satan pal, is what you're upset about. The silly Queen is up to her eyeballs in debt of one sort or another. Thank God it's the the THRONE I'm concerned about., and not the possibly wicked bum that eventually sits on it. But not always.

The holo thing is a hoax, ya just gotta see the BIG PICTURE! No matter how much ya don't like seeing it. World history extends far more than 60 years. All the worlds a stage. The Germans are the present scene. (I wonder if their heart is up to it?)

If you want to know why we are in this insane position. If you want to know why we are wasting our time madly debating a stupid 60 year old bit of BS! If you want to know whats really goin on, then ya just gotta get the BIG picture. There is no better place to get the BIG picture from than from the most hated man, the most hated man on the planet! Don't listen to this man. He is poison. He is a hater, a bigot, an anti-serpentic. (did I splell that rite) He is diametrically opposed to YOU! Yeah, I reckon outta foolish democratic love for the freedom of being TOTALLY WRONG.. ya just gotta hear what this guy has to say.

The Jews - I would have thought Germans, Martin Luther and all... but no. I must be dreaming. Yeah, you think the Germans have problems. Just get a load of what's comin down the pipe. That wicked ol' Pastor Phelps. His latest sermon about the naughty figs, explains it all. http://www.godhatesfags.com/audio/sermons/sermons.html

Yeah, Pastor Phelps is as serious as a heart attack. How serious is that? If you want to have a fleeting CHANCE of escape; Make sure you WATCH the fig tree. But make doubly sure you know who the boss is!
There was no holocaust.

Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

Reviso
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:21 pm

Re:

Postby Reviso » 8 years 10 months ago (Fri May 25, 2012 3:23 am)

I accidentally posted twice. Sorry.
R.
Last edited by Reviso on Fri May 25, 2012 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Reviso
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:21 pm

Re:

Postby Reviso » 8 years 10 months ago (Fri May 25, 2012 3:25 am)

Turpitz wrote:Image

It does not tell us specifically why "50,000 Jews gathered in Hyde Park to do a spot of Hun baiting, or who organised such a massive meeting. All it mentions is a "Violent Campaign".


Is it possible to know the source of these very interesting picture and text ? A book ? A periodical ? Thanks beforehand.
R.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests