Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 1 decade 9 months ago (Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:51 pm)

Saw this at holocaustdenialvideos.com

http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/littleboy/

"The Famous Little Boy Photo is a propaganda photo from the Jewish Underground."

It enumerates a number of reasons why the author thinks the photo is black propaganda:

1) It's Not A Photo A General Would Choose.
2) They Wouldn't Duplicate It That Way
3) The Caption Doesn't Fit The Photo
4) It's Part Of A Larger Fraudulent Work
5) The Real Photographer is George Kadish.
6) The boy is probably Tsvi Nussbaum
7) Problems With A Late Insert Of The Photo

It's interesting to compare this article to Mark Weber's essay from 14 years ago on the subject:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14n2p6.html

User avatar
PotPie
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:04 am
Location: Here

Re: Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Postby PotPie » 1 decade 9 months ago (Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:13 pm)

Ah, Denierbud. Good man. I admire his tenacity and attention to detail. His Stroop Report page is also good reading.

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Re: Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Postby Haldan » 6 years 6 months ago (Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:57 pm)

Sorry to bump an old topic, but this issue is still relevant and in Europe they're trotting the now considerably older Nussbaum's nonsense, in almost a semi-religious setting. On television of course.
Did anybody ever save this essay, because I cannot reach the page in the first post by Mr CCS.

Regards,
haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan

Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 6 years 6 months ago (Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:37 pm)

What's the t.v program? It's being shown on Europe t.v? I guess Tsvi Nussbaum would only be about 80 now.

User avatar
Sannhet
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Essay: The Famous Little Boy Photo is black propaganda

Postby Sannhet » 6 years 6 months ago (Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:43 am)

The link is not working for me. Here is an archived version:

http://web.archive.org/web/20120510150816/http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/littleboy/


INTRODUCTION
1) It's Not A Photo A General Would Choose.
2) They Wouldn't Duplicate It That Way
3) The Caption Doesn't Fit The Photo
4) It's Part Of A Larger Fraudulent Work
5) The Real Photographer is George Kadish.
6) The boy is probably Tsvi Nussbaum
7) Problems With A Late Insert Of The Photo
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION
[By Denierbud]

It's the world's most well-known document of the holocaust, and this essay explains why it's a fraud. Everyone has seen the photo of the little boy with his hands raised. But few know that the photo is one of 53 photos from the Stroop Report, a book supposedly created by SS General Jürgen Stroop commemorating the defeat of the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. The Stroop Report has a written section, a daily report section, and a photo section. The little boy photo is from the photo section. That we get this photo from the Nazis themselves is a surprise to most people. The truth, however, is that we get it from the wartime Jewish Underground. It's just meant to appear like it's from the Nazis. The photo is a real Warsaw photo but outside the ghetto. The photographer, George Kadish, was a member of the Zionist Underground. Thus it's no mistake that the photo engenders sympathy for the Jews and anger toward the Nazis.

Sandwiched between the introduction and conclusion are seven sections, each offering a reason why the little boy photo is "black propaganda." Black propaganda is false information and material that purports to be from a source on one side of a conflict, but is actually from the opposing side. It is typically used to vilify, embarrass or misrepresent the enemy.1 The little boy photo is black propaganda in that it's taken by a member of the Jewish Underground and meant to look like General Stroop's staff took it. The photo was then inserted into a larger work of black propaganda known as the Stroop Report. Jürgen Stroop was sentenced to death and executed in Stalinist Poland. The prosecutors used the Stroop Report in their case against him. 2

Many of the discoveries about the photo come from Richard Raskin's book "A Child At Gunpoint" (Aarhus University Press 2004.) Raskin is an American Jewish professor living in Denmark who believes the standard story of the photo, but puzzles over aspects of it. These puzzling aspects point to the photo being black propaganda from the Jewish Underground, but Raskin never considers that. Even when he finds out that the most famous Jewish ghetto photographer of WWII mysteriously had a printing plate of it before the photo was known to the public. 3

Continued....


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests