Here is all the proof that one needs to know and understand what a pathetic liar Muehlenkamp is and how he has known for ages EXACTLY what the NAFH would accept as evidence. Please notice how he uses the word “documentation” and how extensive it should be. His words are quiet similar to my recent suggestions.
First, my VNN post #554:
“I can't make a determination on your "scientifically sound and reasonable documentation" until after it is published in said magazines. All your questions should be addressed to the editors of said magazines. But if you're so sure that you've compiled enough "scientifically sound and reasonable documentation," then what are you and your fellow funny boy freaks waiting for Roberta?”
Muehlenkamp’s VNN post #566:
“So you’re saying that you cannot tell us, until it is published in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, whether documentation of the type mentioned below… would satisfy your challenge requirements? By reasonable standards of evidence it would be sufficient to refer to all the documentary, physical and eyewitness evidence that proves mass murder at all and any of the camps in question… But we’re not talking about reasonable standards here. We’re talking about the unreasonable standards of Mr. Gerdes, who wants to see specific evidentiary documentation about the "exact" location of a specific mass grave, the "exact" dimensions of that mass grave and the contents of that specific mass grave in terms of human remains… Now, assuming I published documentation of the kind described in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, how do I know that Gerdes will even look at the contents of this documentation and tell me whether or not those contents meet the requirements for his reward? How do I know he’s not simply going to say, "No, that’s not the kind of documentation I wanted to see… But OK… I’ll do exactly what he suggests. I’ll try to put together documentation that I think must be reasonably accepted as proof of Gerdes’ requirements (of course I nowhere said that I have all this documentation available already, unlike lying Gerdes is now trying to believe) and to have it published in either SKEPTIC and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine. I have no idea how long it will take me to do that, assuming I can put together the time and money required, obtain the permissions necessary to conduct archeological investigations and find archeologists and forensic experts to prepare the reports, drawings and other elements I described. When I have gathered all this documentation and succeeded in having it published in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine – that should be the least of problems, as either of them will probably be crazy for such documentation – , I shall report back and claim the reward. And if Gerdes should then refuse to pay it, we shall see what a court of law says about whether or not the documentation presented complies with Gerdes’ challenge requirements.”
Now my VNN post #615:
“Again Roberto Muehlenkamp / Guadalupe Salcedo, EVERYTHING needed to understand EXACTLY what is required to lay claim to THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward can be found on the nafcash website and the bonus reward is what I have laid out below. Nothing could be simpler than understanding what the terms and conditions are to lay claim to THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward and no amount of bazaar mental gymnastics by certain mentally ill people will alter them… Nafcash reserves the right to make additions, deletions and/or modifications to any challenge it offers at any time, as long as those additions, deletions and/or modifications don't alter in any way the original contractual agreement between nafcash and the supporters of the challenge reward or the fundamental requirements of laying claim to the reward offered. All additions, deletions and/or modifications must comply and be in complete accordance with the contracts fundamental nature, so any additions, deletions and/or modifications cannot and will not alter the fundamental nature of the contracts ALREADY SIGNED by the supporters of the challenge reward. Because all contracts entered into (in order to be legally binding) by nafcash and the supporters of its challenges are perishable, no monetary amount can be "locked in" unless and until the claimant to the challenge reward has met the EXPRESSED requirement of having the required proof published in the required publications. (Skeptic and/or Archaeology magazines.) Whatever amount is being offered by nafcash ON THE DAY OF PUBLICATION is the amount that becomes "locked in." And on that day, one meets the requirement as to becoming a CLAIMANT only. No guarantee has ever been expressed or implied by nafcash that by meeting the requirements to become a claimant automatically entitles said claimant to the reward, and no amount of bazaar mental gymnastics by certain mentally ill people will alter this fact. It' appears, through either sheer stupidity and/or mental illness, that certain people think that they can alter nafcash's contractual agreements with its supporters by simply wishing it were so. I'm sorry if I’ve burst your Alice in Wonderland bubble "Guadalupe"... please take the time to read and understand the nafcash site, as the requirements for becoming a claimant to the reward offered have been so simplified and made so easy to understand, that even a retarded child could understand them. So I must conclude that you have either not taken the time and effort to read and understand the nafcash site, or you have the mental capacity of a retarded child.”
Muehlenkamp’s VNN post #648:
“Then let's make that a potential applicant, to satisfy Gerdes' hair-splitting. My point remains the same: even after submitting proof that meets the challenge requirements, one is not legally entitled to get the reward, right? Submitting proof that meets the requirements, by publishing it in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, does not guarantee that you get the reward. You may get it, or you may not… What happens then?.. Then I might consider opening a lawsuit and having a court of law decide whether or not the requirements of the challenge have been objectively met by the proof published in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine.”
Muehlenkamp’s VNN post #668:
“Let's assume I have published proof objectively meeting the challenge requirements in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine and am therefore entitled to lay claim to the reward. I then submit my evidence to the consideration of NAFCASH. I send them all reports by archeologists or forensic experts, drawings, photos, video clips, GPR surveys etc. that I have collected, together with a letter formally requesting payment of the reward to a given account. The elements I submit meet the challenge requirements, i.e.… they prove beyond a reasonable doubt the exact location and exact dimensions of a given mass grave at Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor or Treblinka and that this grave contains human remains corresponding to at least 1 % of the estimated number of victims of these camps according to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. With that submittal, I shall have a legally valid and enforceable claim to the reward. The association NAFCASH, validly represented by Mr. Greg Gerdes, and the supporters XYZ of the NAFCASH challenge, undertake the legally binding commitment that, in case the conditions described in the previous two paragraphs are met, they will pay me the net amount of 100,000 US dollars. The association NAFCASH and each of the challenge supporters shall be jointly and severally liable to this effect. The implications of this legally binding commitment are that, if NAFCASH and the challenge supporters should fail to pay the reward, despite all conditions for payment having been complied with…, I can sue them or any of them (as they are jointly and severally liable) before a competent court of law and obtain from that court of law an award whereby the respondent or respondents must pay, lest a court executor pawns their assets and sells them in an auction to the extent required for satisfying my claim. Is the above correct, Mr. Gerdes?”
YES IT IS ROBERTO.
As I told you in my VNN post #688:
“Roberta, by having your alleged "proof" published in "Skeptic" or Archaeology magazines, you will have completed the vetting process, and can then submit said published material / "proof" to nafcash for consideration for THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward. Now, once the previously mentioned published / vetted material is presented, nafcash will then have to make a determination as to whether or not the submitted material actually meets the requirements for the claimant to receive the reward. And if it does, you will be declared the recipient of said reward. Put simply, the presented material will have to be authenticated and validated before any determination / declaration can be made. Once all requirements have been met and Greg Gerdes (the executor of nafcash's - THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE) has officially declared that the submitted material has been authenticated and validated as legitimate proof and has met all requirements - expressed and implied, then, and only then, will the supporters of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE be notified that they have 30 days to pay the declared recipient the monetary amount they are legally bound to pay as is stipulated in their contracts. All contracts will then be turned over to the reward recipient to ensure payment. If the reward claimant feels that they have been unjustly denied, or if a reward recipient does not receive the promised money, then of course that claimant / recipient has at their disposal the U.S. court system and the myriad jews who infest it to help them get relief.”