Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:30 am)

This goes out to the german speaking readers here, lately the BEST documentary on WW2 got hosted on youtube. It deals with Hitler´s various efforts to avoid war, how the allies intrigued against germany´s efforts to find peaceful settlements,it refers to stalins starving of the ukranians, polish slaughters against minority germans, a fair and unbiased version of WW2 which paints a completely different picture as what we are taught today...

I do not exaggerate when I say: In case you are able to understand german, this is a must watch video.

Watch it, spread it, you have never been informed about WW2 the way this professional documentary does (professional speakers, cuts, editting....).

Watch and spread:

Hitlers Krieg? Was Guido Knopp verschweigt


part 1 not available in every country
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGcSQoHx2Lg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxbYAsWYpYE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppR6sPnMsXM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFZ0OG7eG6c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uXRtN6YTi8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xew5q5PS9pM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWZm84azaSk
part 9 not available in every country
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2sB36MjdtY

==================
I am fully aware, this is not directly holocaust related, but I need to make use of any means I have to spread the truth.
Last edited by Halo on Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:35 am)

What may be the second best video in five parts may be the following:

Wer wollte den Krieg der zum Weltkrieg wurde? - 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IImEmbJqwQw&feature=PlayList&p=564D4ACA6EEE0045&index=0&playnext=1

The speaker in German is General Gerd Schultze-Ronhof who is also the author of: 1939 Der Krieg der viele Vaeter hatte.

The book has already gone through five editions in German but none in English and seems to be the basis of much that is seen in the video recommended by Halo. Although the videos and book do not really deal with the so-called "holocaust," they do show the true "revisionist" history of the period with extraordinary clarity. They also show how vastly different that historical reality is from the mytho-mania with which American are so thoroughly brainwashed everyday from morning until late at night.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:12 am)

Oh yeah! I know Schulze Rhonhoff and this threads documentary is based on his work as far as I know.
As youtube is fast with censoring, they already censored part 1 and 9 of it. I updated my start post.

Here is the high res version of the film:

http://www.filefront.com/14736591/Doku- ... part1.rar/

http://www.filefront.com/14738055/Doku- ... part2.rar/

http://www.filefront.com/14738193/Doku- ... part3.rar/

wtfhappenedtohess
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:41 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby wtfhappenedtohess » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:40 am)

Who made this film? Germans?

How were they able to make a 'revisionist' film? I thought you get jail for promoting a revisions side of view because they could promote it as "promoting the ideas of national socialism and adolf hitler"

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:15 pm)

Is the text of the ten-part video available anywhere? It would be well worth translating. The same applies to Schultze-Ronhof's book and five-part speech.

The key to many questions are the archives in Moscow which are now closed again. Obviously, the Russian soviet-nationalists (Putin and Medvedev) who want to see Stalin as a great leader have much to hide.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:04 pm)

@friedrich: I sent a PM to a friend who seems to know the authors- or at least the uploader of that documentary. When I get any news on a transcript, I will post here.



I intended to give a short summary here myself, but didnt find the time.... I wanna post a pm I sent on youtube instead, to a guy who disagreed with my view on WW2, you will find a lot of the topics discussed in the documentary in my reply, and this way- indirectly- I give a short summary. I wrote out of my memory, so dont be too harsh when I make slight errors in details, but you get the greater picture:


Hey *****,

I quote your text and then I tell you what I learned. Just yesterday a new documentary on this topic hit youtube, but its in german.

Here we go:

"Yes I am aware of what Hitler had proposed to Poland. He wanted a transportation line and communication across the Polish Corridor to unite Danzig with Germany. But come on! Think about it! Hitler also wanted lebensraumin Russia (that is fact!)".


====================================
Hitler tried depserately to keep peace with the poles. He even proposed them west prussia (he landmass between east prussia and the reich) to satisfy their greed. The poles had secret negotiations with england and france, which had but one gol: drag germany into a war in order to smash it. Germany got rid of the jew bankers and the economic success of Hitlers monetary system posed a serious threat to the english, aswell as to the french- who saw all their "versailles benefits" float down the river. The french numerously broke the versailles PEACE!treaty and occupied german territories in the west in peace time. Not to mention that germany was the ONLY nation that sticked to the versailles peace treaty with regards to disarmament. NONE of the allied nations kept their word, as they never intended to do so anyways. The poles oppressed their minorities, including BARBARIC slaughters of their minorities- the letts, the ukranians, the white russians and the germans. Lately "russia today" broadcasted a clip, in which it was stated, that Poland dreamed of occupying germany, they dreamed of marching towards Berlin and occupy it. There are polish maps, that paint a picture of poland plus half of germany! With Frances and Englands promise, to stick together in the upcoming war, not too unrealistic with regard to the OVERWHELMING superiourity military wise those 3 parties had in comparison with germany.
(I will post a link, where u can check the armaments for yourself.)

Did you know, that poland shot in 3 occasions with flak artillery at german civil lufthansa airplanes? Did you know, that the poles systematically oppressed, raped, and slaughtered the minority germans?
Hitler made it glass clear: The danzig question and the corridor question are of secondary importance- but these massacres cannot go on any longer. That was the main reason why germany attacked poland.

And then FRANCE and ENGLAND declared war on germany! not the other way round!!!, which was countered by a successful attack on france and victory- against france, who was considered to have the best tanks in the world that time. France was numerically superiour- but their tactics sucked and they didnt use radio in their tanks- but the germans did.
Hitler did not want war, hence he let 250.000!!!! british soldiers escape at dunkirch, who were expected to helpt their frensh co- conspirators. Hitler hoped for the reasonability of the british.
If you ask me: his gravest mistake in that war- trusting the fairness of the british. He made no less than 7!!!! peace offers to england.
Rudolf hess even flew over to england, alone, making his first oarachute jump, unarmed, to bring the english to reason and stop the bloodbath. And how did they thank him? THEY LOCKED HIM AWAY IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT! An entire prisson for him alone, which was designed for 600 prissoners. He would never see his new born son again. And one day before his release after DECADES of solitary confinement- he commited a convenient "suicide".

Do you know why the germans fought so well mate? Why they fought till the last? Cause it was about survival. Kaufman plan, Morgenthal plan, sterilizing every male german or sending them to far away countries, women would be only allowed to get mixed raced children, the entire annihilation of dresden, where 400.000 germans were turned into ashes. Plans to saturated germany with anthrax cakes to kill as many germans as possible....

Thats why they fought till they couldnt anymore.
=======================================

Russia: Russia was preparing the largest invasion ever waged in mankinds history- 25.000 tanks! Stalin made it clear: this is an army to attack. The tanks were designed for western europe.

Germany´s attack was a pre- emptive strike against an army, that was set to "attack mode". The surprise attack was the only chance to chop this monster´s head off while it wasnt ready-hence the "easy" victory in the beinning and the millions of POWs. Not to mention that russia invaed and occupied numerous sovereign nations on its way to germany´s border- a matter of fact thats swept under the carpet these days...


Lebensraum:
"In order to do that He would have to march across Poland (he did)."


You know hat Hitler mentioned this in his book, "Mein Kampf", written in 1924-a full 15 years! before the war broke out. He later distanced himself from it. And what logic does it make, do give the poles west prussia and even OFFERING THEM THE SECURITY OF THEIR BORDERS FOR 99 YEARS- WHICH EFFECTIVELY MEANT: DEFEND HER AGAINST THE EXPANDING SOVIET UNION?

And thats another nice point where those brave allies do not look too good: Poland was attacked by germany and russia, but did the allies declare war on russia? NO! They even fed that monster with their infamous landlease program!

It was always about bringing germany down. If you want someone to blame for the attack on poland, blame the polish themselves.

"Hitler was the ultimate deciever in politics and foreign policy. Just look at the Munich Agreement. It was agreed that Hitler could annex the sudentenlands back with Germany. But soon after doing so he marched his troops into Prague and occupied Czecholsovakia."

===========================
Czechoslovakia was an artificial state, consistin of slavs, czechs, and germans. The germans were the only, who found NO representation in that state, but were beaten, murdered and abused by that terror state on a daily basis. The sudetenland bordered with the german reich, and it was NO ANNEXION! It was a willful reunion with the reich. The Sudentengermans celebrated their rejoining with the reich feverishly, and this was as much an "annexion" as austria was. Austria even send troops to munich when german troops entered austria to demontrate to the world: this is NOT an occupation, this is a "wished for" and peaceful reunification. More than 90% of the inhabitants wanted it.

================================================
Do you really think he would of kept his word to the Polish on his so called 'intentions'? He decieved the nations of Europe and the German people.


----------------------
He saved the german people from bolshevism, which would have replaced the weimar republic. You knwo that the national socialists had streetfights with the commies on the streets of berlin? With everything up to machine guns.

No mate, the official version of WW2 is BULLSHIT.

You want to know why germany invaded poland? Scroll down and watch the pregnat woman giving birth while beeing slaughtered by those "poor polish victims of nazi aggression". Thats why the germans went in there.

http://titkost.50webs.com/konyvek/atrochu2.htm

(scroll down to the very bottom, the photos have english subtitles)

Here is another most interesting read:


The Myth Of German Culpability
The 2nd World War
The True Sequence Of Aggression

http://www.rense.com/general83/dett.htm

Please pay special attention to the comments made by Prof. Dr. Kümel and Michael Rivero.


I didnt want to sound harsh, I dont wanna sound mean. Please take your time after this lenghty pm, and check out the links I sent if you find the mood. You will understand better what really happened.

Best wishes, your friend
****

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:53 pm)

In part 7 of the 10 part video "Hitlers Krieg? Was Guido Knopp verschweigt"
and at about 8 minutes 10 seconds into the video, it is claimed that from the beginning of the war until November of 1940 there were 24 German peace offers to the British through various diplomatic channels (including even the Vatican)--but they were all categorically rejected by the British. The secret British document actually appears on the video. Lord Vansittart's role in this policy of total rejection is mentioned as well.

No doubt, there were many other offers for peace afterwards from the Germans as well, including that of Rudolf Hess who flew to Britain in May of 1940 to try to prove with his own physical presence that Germany's peace offers were real. For that Christ-like act Hess was thanked with life imprisonment, most of it in solitary confinement until he was actually murdered inn his cell.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

Heydrich
Member
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:26 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Heydrich » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:17 am)

Hello Halo,

Can you please upload the high res version of the film again ? The downloaded files are corrupted when extracting.

The best solution would be to upload the complete uncompressed AVI file to http://www.flyupload.com (where you can upload up to a 2 GB file) and then post the download link here. Thank you.

Halo
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Halo » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:32 am)

I too got an error mesage when I extracted the 3 parts, but the avi file runs like a charm nonetheless...
Please try to use 7zip to extract, in case it wouldnt work, I will upload the film (try to, as my internet connection is really not one of the fastest...).

Best wishes!

PatrickSMcNally
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:47 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby PatrickSMcNally » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:26 pm)

Halo wrote:polish slaughters against minority germans

Although there were massacres committed against the German minority in Poland, these began several days after the war had been launched by Hitler. Between 2-6 thousand ethnic Germans were slaughtered beginning by about the third day of the war. That was not Hitler's motive for going to war on September 1, 1939. He did it with the intent of forcing Britain and France to accept an end of their influence in eastern Europe. He did not desire a war with the two western powers, but was willing to take a calculated gamble on such in the bet that they would be forced to yield. The violence committed by Polish nationalists against the German minority came after Hitler had begun the war for completely different reasons.

Russia: Russia was preparing the largest invasion ever waged in mankinds history- 25.000 tanks!

That's a more than two-fold exaggeration. This hoax was started by Rezun/Suvorov using a play on words to mislead the reader:

http://web.archive.org/web/200804260040 ... 8/lang,en/

Let us begin with, perhaps, one of Rezun’s most important statements – his estimate of the number of tanks in service with the Red Army at the start of the Great Patriotic War [referred to simply as “the war” elsewhere in this article – Transl.]. Specifically:

"As of June 21, 1941, Stalin has 24,000 tanks at his disposal. <...>
...as of June 22, 1941, Hitler had deployed a total of 3,350 tanks on the Eastern Front. The Wehrmacht’s overall tank strength was slightly higher, however the excess was deployed on other fronts and as such should not be counted."
(“The Last Republic”, Chapter “What tanks did Hitler have?”, pp. 269-270)

Technically the Red Army had slightly fewer tanks than the figure mentioned by Rezun – 23,106, to be exact (Military History Journal No.11, 1993, the article can be found here), but let’s not split hairs. The really interesting part of Rezun’s above statement is this: why does Rezun’s analysis compare the number of tanks deployed on the Eastern Front to the Red Army’s entire tank pool? And by “entire”, I mean inclusive of broken-down machines as well as of tanks deployed not on the Western borders but, say, in the Soviet Far East.

The Military History Journal provides detailed statistics on Soviet armor just prior to the war. As it happens, the Western Defence Districts had only 12,782 tanks, rather than Rezun’s 24,000, and 2,242 of those tanks were listed as broken down and “in need of repairs”. As an aside, in the first version of this article, written nearly five years ago, I made an error in stating that most of the remaining, active tanks had actually been not combat-ready. I would readily like to correct myself in this regard – the data shows that the remaining 10,540 tanks were listed at June 1, 1941 as combat-ready. The total was comprised of 8,383 tanks in active service, including some in need of minor repairs, as well as of 2,157 brand new machines with zero mileage. Notably, these figures are for all five Western Defence Districts, although only three of them – the Baltic Defence District, Western Special Defence District and Kiev Special Defence District – actually covered the Western borders. Clearly, the number of tanks deployed in those three districts is even lower, which means Rezun has more than doubled the number of Soviet tanks involved in the summer battles of 1941, especially in the border regions. At the same time, Rezun showed considerably greater discretion in estimating the number of German tanks facing Russia, only counting those machines actually deployed on the Eastern Front. Quite a curious double standard, isn’t it.

Whatever else may eventually prove to be true, relying on someone who twists the facts the way Rezun/Suvorov repeatedly did is not a good idea.

Hitler mentioned this in his book, "Mein Kampf", written in 1924-a full 15 years! before the war broke out. He later distanced himself from it.

No he did not. Hitler's private notes in Table Talk and anywhere else make it clear that right up until the end he saw the war in Russia in colonialist terms and that is true independently of whether or not at some point perhaps better evidence will one day be brought forward to support a modified variation of something like the Rezun/Suvorov thesis. Whatever one may guess about Stalin's motives, it's clear that Hitler envisioned the purpose of the war in Russia as the conquest of living space and that he did not at all take the Soviet Union seriously as a military opponent before November 1941. Even well into 1942 he showed a tendency to trivialize the USSR as a military opponent and instead compared the war in Russia with the European wars across North America against the Red Indians, which was not at all an appropriate comparison.

The Sudentengermans celebrated

It wasn't the claiming of those territories which caused Britian to draw a line. Hitler annexed the remains of Czechoslovakia (some parts were given over to Hungary) in March 1939 as a way of demonstrating that his earlier agreement with Britain placed no restraints on him. This annexation had nothing to do with bringing ethnic Germans into the Reich. If Hitler had not done that, then it was already Chamberlain's intent to reach an agreement over Danzig. It was Hitler's violation of the Munich agreement which led Chamberlain to promise unconditional aid to the Poles. As a consequence, when Hitler invaded Poland he was drawing the last straw. He should have adhered to the original Munich agreement and simply demanded similar changes reached over Danzig, and then Chamberlain would have been cooperative.

He saved the german people from bolshevism, which would have replaced the weimar republic.

In actuality, the way that the Communist International saw things was that they regarded the Social Democrats as their major barrier and it was maintained that a victory by Hitler would create opportunities by crushing the Soc Dems. The term "social fascist" was widely used in Comintern publications as a way of characterizing the Second International, which was seen as the primary force of counter-revolution. In Comintern language up until 1934, it was the "social fascists" who were the real enemy and a victory for Hitler was the better outcome in such circumstances.

Heydrich
Member
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:26 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Heydrich » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:22 pm)

"That was not Hitler's motive for going to war on September 1, 1939."

Wrong. More than 200 Germans have been slaughtered in the weeks before September 1, 1939 and more than 80.000 have fled from Poland to the Reich due to harassment from Polish people. I also want to mention the attacks from Poland on German civil aircraft and so on... that alone is a reason for war.

Hitler did not saw Russia as a future colony. Don't believe that inaccurate Table Talk garbage from Picker written after the war. Hitler attacked Russia only in a pre-emptive strike mode. 5.000.000 million Russian soldiers were lined up at the frontier and ready to attack Germany.

Learn German, read the original sources and the books mentioned above in this thread.

I personally talked to people who worked very close with Hitler on a daily basis and even had a family member who was a high ranking member of the inner circle.

Hitler wanted war and colonies ? Bullshit. He was more forthcoming to Poland than any Weimar government. Hitler wanted to protect the ethnic Germans tantalised in Poland. He never wanted war. He wanted to build the best social welfare state combined with highest culture. He was too successful with it.

Hitler cut out the jewish bankers from profit. The success of the German economy brought up the envy of the British, the Americans and French. And jewish money feared that NS Germany could be a model for other states. No more profit for jews, that could not be so a war had to be started with provoking Germany over its limits.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2256
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Lamprecht » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:30 pm)

PatrickSMcNally wrote:Although there were massacres committed against the German minority in Poland, these began several days after the war had been launched by Hitler. Between 2-6 thousand ethnic Germans were slaughtered beginning by about the third day of the war. That was not Hitler's motive for going to war on September 1, 1939. He did it with the intent of forcing Britain and France to accept an end of their influence in eastern Europe. He did not desire a war with the two western powers, but was willing to take a calculated gamble on such in the bet that they would be forced to yield. The violence committed by Polish nationalists against the German minority came after Hitler had begun the war for completely different reasons.
Would you be willing to post a source for this information or PM/email me it?
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
ClaudiaRothenbach
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:16 pm

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby ClaudiaRothenbach » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:40 pm)

PatrickSMcNally wrote:Although there were massacres committed against the German minority in Poland, these began several days after the war had been launched by Hitler. Between 2-6 thousand ethnic Germans were slaughtered beginning by about the third day of the war. That was not Hitler's motive for going to war on September 1, 1939.


Sounds like you did not really understand the film. The reasons for the attack of the Wehrmacht were:
- Poland brought weapons and soldiers to Danzig
- Poland closed the corridor to Eastern Prussia
- ca. 400,000 Germans had to flee from 1921 to 1938, in 1939 80,000 more Germans had to flee
- On August 30 the Polnish army was mobilized (this was a declaration of war at the time)
- There were many attacks on German civil airplanes and territory (Gleiwitz was an allied lie)

The proposal of the German government is published. Has nothing to do with British influence.

It is worth to know that the first genocide of WW2 was a polnish crime.
The genocide was prepared before the beginning of the war (concentration camps, arresting lists, transport infrastructure) and started on Sept.1. On the third day the Bromberger Blutsonntag (Bydgozc bloody sunday) took place.
"Everything has already been said, but not yet by everyone." - Karl Valentin

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:10 pm)

It is NO mere coincidence that all six of the so-called "extermination camps" are located in what is Poland today. Poland is an appallingly backward, third world country--even today--next to the thriving heart of modern Europe which is Germany. In the 1920's and 1930's it was even more backward but what it lacked in modernity and civilization, it more than made up for with its wildly aggressive ambitions at the expense of all of its neighbors.

Poland's role in bringing about WW2 has been almost totally neglected, especially in the US--even by revisionists. Polish society, especially its "intelligentsia" (if there even is such a thing), was and still is deeply infected by an anti-German virus which shows itself to this day in holocaust propaganda. Telling really big lies about the Germans was, and still is, a kind of Polish cottage industry. This anti-German madness combined with the most fantastic delusions about Polish greatness, and military prowess, was probably the most important reason for the war breaking out. Many Poles, some quite prominent, believed they would be fighting on German territory from the very beginning of the war--and even imagined that they would be able to reconquer that ancient Polish city, "Berlin." Those Polish delusions served the anti-German ambitions of Vansittart and Churchill and FDR and the Jews extremely well. Without those really "stupid" Poles, they just weren't able to make the war happen.

I recommend pages 414-30 of Gerd Schultze-Ronhof's 1939: Der Krieg der viele Vaeter hatte.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

PatrickSMcNally
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:47 am

Re: Germany was innocent! Best Docu ever(german)

Postby PatrickSMcNally » 1 decade 1 year ago (Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:05 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:
PatrickSMcNally wrote:Although there were massacres committed against the German minority in Poland, these began several days after the war had been launched by Hitler. Between 2-6 thousand ethnic Germans were slaughtered beginning by about the third day of the war. That was not Hitler's motive for going to war on September 1, 1939. He did it with the intent of forcing Britain and France to accept an end of their influence in eastern Europe. He did not desire a war with the two western powers, but was willing to take a calculated gamble on such in the bet that they would be forced to yield. The violence committed by Polish nationalists against the German minority came after Hitler had begun the war for completely different reasons.
Would you be willing to post a source for this information or PM/email me it?

Since there are several statements there, I'm not sure which one you have in mind. But let's make a shot at some of them.

Regarding the events in Poland, there's Richard Blanke, ORPHANS OF VERSAILLES: THE GERMANS IN WESTERN POLAND, 1918-1939. This book deals with the status of ethnic Germans in the Danzig Corridor and also covers the outbreak of massacres in the first week of war.

A more general survey of the events leading up to the start of the war would be the 3rd edition of Richard Overy, ORIGINS OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR. That's sort of a modern-day analogue to A.J.P. Taylor's somewhat dated but still interesting classic of a similar title. Overy rejects the claim that Hitler had meant for this to be the start of a general war, but traces the miscalculations which went into the start of war in 1939.

The whole showdown over Danzig carries some partial analogy with the later events in Kosovo, but that cuts both ways. Critics of the Clinton administration charged at the time that the calls for "humanitarian intervention" by Washington over Kosovo merely made a bad situation worse. That certainly applies to Hitler's way of handling first the Munich treaty and then the Danzig crisis. Had Hitler simply observed the Munich agreement, it was already anticipated by CHamberlain that some similar arrangement would have to be arrived at over Danzig. It was Hitler's annexation of the rump remains of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 which put Chamberlain in the position of swearing unconditional support to Poland when he would have favored a more nuanced approach.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests