Nobody is denying concentration camps and tattooed arms. They're denying a program of mass extermination and mass-gassings.
No, they are NOT
"denying" a program of mass extermination and mass-gassings.
They don't believe that mass extermination and mass-gassings took place. (And justifiably so.)
There is a big difference.
You cannot deny something that doesn't exist or never happened.
Sorry Twila. I deny
, as well as Butz, that there was a will and a program of mass extermination and mass gassing. When I am able to plainly demonstrate that there wasn't any plan of extermination, the cyanide, the Zyklon, the holes, the diesel, Gerstein or Hoess, etc...are surely useful to confirm ex post, but are merely subsidiary issues. That is the big difference
. Holocaust never happened because firstly nobody wanted it to happen, and those kind of mass murders by a Government require always precise and definite orders. And they must be. And you have to find the documents, hundreds, exactly where you expect to find. And you have to find a knowledge from many protagonists, friends and enemies.
Revisionists shouldn't ever concede this point and pass easily to the successive.
Instead, by conceding this point, they were conducted to discuss Dachau till 1960, then Auschwitz, then the Reinhard(t) Camps, then the Einsatzgruppen in the East, i.e. "the Holocaust by bullets". They did always a good job, anyway, addressing each of these issues, but really they were always conducted.