Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
In God Delusion it is clear a fierce atack against christianism and islamism while nearly neglecting mentioning judaism (let alone sionism). But nevertheless the book is interesting and I ignored the eventual bias by considering that Dawkins might be wanting to avoid confrontation with the sionist power.
However I am amazed that in his latest book "The Greatest Show on Earth" Mr Dawkins has associated the truthfulness of the Darwin’s scientific findings about evolution with the truthfulness of the beliefs of the holocaust. In his last book he afirms that the evidence for the evolution is at least as reliable as for the holocaust. Poor Darwin! He might have now turned around in his tomb.
We know that science has been used to investigate Auschwitz and the Leucther Report proves that the homicidal gas chambers never existed. The alleged genocide was sykewar propaganda. If there is no more scientific activity being carried out on more investigation on the alleged event it is because there is no just a penny being invested on it, and when there is a fund the Polish authorities stop to enter the camp (S.E Castan was forbiden to investigate Awschwitz). However there are millions put to propagate the myth.
Also is known that some holocaust scholars are even suggesting to destroy the remains of what is called gas chambers – they should be the ones more interested in preserve it and investigate scientifically and put an end on the argument. As the holocaust scholar Van de Pelt now declares, 99% of what is known about that event can't be proven and now is more about of "moral evidence" (sic). Therefore Holocaust is clearly a belief, a myth that science can't prove -actually it never proved.
Now putting the holocaust, the so much debatable event, on the same level of truth as the for the Evolution is wrong to say the least, or ignorant or naive to be generous. I hope Mr Dawkins is not doing this afirmation maliciously.
Do you think that Evolution and Holocaust truthfulness should be associated?
In his last book he afirms that the evidence for the evolution is at least as reliable as for the holocaust.
And what is wrong with his statement? There is no evidence for evolution and there is no evidence for the Holocaust.
Back in the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion "is written:
"Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the GOYIM."
- Valued contributor
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:19 pm
- Location: Zionist country
As to evolution ( which is bascially denying creationism) there is scant evidence.
For example, evolutionists love to claim the continents drifted apart over millions of years. Howver, if that was true, the ocean floors would be covered with hundred of feet of silt.
The fact there is no silt on such floors proves they moved part very rapidly. The earth's landscape supports the flood account of the bible as does the variety and complexity of the creatures on earth. Evolutionists must promote inorganic matter becoming organic matter, but such nonsense is beyond bizarre.
In other words folks, a rock somehow turned into a living species and from there, man evolved.
From Rock to Man, there are your evolutionists.You can call your rocks in the garden, " uncle teddy ", but to me they are just rocks in a garden.
just lies from the abandoned race.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests