Is this Elie Wiesel's Tattoo?

[Cloud]

Does anyone have the ability to preserve the video in case in gets pulled? Is there a way to contact the original owner of the video to get an uncut version?

Warden, you can use Download Helper (a Firefox extension) to download YouTube clips and similar videos from the Internet.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3006/

Another one you can use is RealPlayer SP:

http://www.real.com/realplayer

Both are free.

[The Warden]

Thank you, Cloud. Does the downloaded video stay in tact if the original is removed? A lot of times, if a host removes the file, the copy is rendered useless.

The only reason I bring up the lack of audio or video (as of right now) is because Revisionists have always placed physical evidence above documentation and eyewitness testimony. In the future, when Wiesel is long known as a fraud, I don't want someone saying "You have no proof he said that other than the article", and have the reporter recant his story. I tend to hold everyone to the same standard of proof. If there's audio or video proof of him saying what was reported, I'd like someone to have it, in case the Zionists try to get shifty.

[Reinhard]

Thank you, Cloud. Does the downloaded video stay in tact if the original is removed? A lot of times, if a host removes the file, the copy is rendered useless.

Youtube videos can be converted and saved on your harddisk using the following website:

http://vixy.net/

[The Warden]

Excellent.

Now the only thing missing is an actual audio or video file of him saying the quote in the article.

[Balsamo]

In the first video, the Oprah one, she presented Wiesel along with his tatoo number. As he stands beside her without correcting her, i would asume that...

[Carolyn Yeager]

Okay, I have made and posted a new video to replace the one they just took down.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWsjkT1qjnU[/youtube]
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWsjkT1qjnU)

I took a completely neutral approach (didn't speak and just used music and text) and used Miklos Grüner sort of as a crutch, as if to say "these aren't my words, but Miklos Grüner's words". It's only one minute, sort of like a 'commercial', just enough to make a person wonder. (Hopefully this approach will suck in even those who do believe.) There is no swearing, slang or any "disrespect" to the Holohoax Survivors in this video, it's completely academic. This should ensure that it does not get pulled for "hate speech" since I used Grüner's assertion that Wiesel is not who he says he is and doesn't have a tattoo.

If anybody would like the original file, let me know and I'll get it to you. If you have a server/host/website, stick it on there and let me know where it's at. I'm not holding my breath that JewTube won't delete this.

Very good work, thanks. I like it! Just a couple little things that I think detract. The circles on Elie's arm ... it would be better without them because they are saying that the tattoo should be in those spots, and I think the spots are wrong. We don't want to confuse people about where the tattoos were placed. I'm trying to get a picture of Gruner's tattoo - that would explain where they went. So just the arm showing no marks is best. Also, the red lettering on the Buchenwald picture doesn't read, and it's saying something important. I like the solemn music and the documentary feel to it. I like the statement: Many have asked to see it. That really hits. Maybe all those words of fake, imposter, and so on might be overkill. Just the question, and then leading people to the website would be just right.

Vlad, you should work on a video like this one using the Buchenwald Famous Photo page ... lots of visual material to work with there. If you do, consider letting me preview it just to make sure it's accurate. I think that would be a blockbuster. Of course, the tattoo issue is too.

Videos can do so much. I'm grateful to you for producing these. We need people who are really good at audio-visual material.

[Carolyn Yeager]

In the first video, the Oprah one, she presented Wiesel along with his tatoo number. As he stands beside her without correcting her, i would asume that...

Balsamo,

You're right. That works.

[vladkampfer]

Very good work, thanks. I like it! Just a couple little things that I think detract. The circles on Elie's arm ... it would be better without them because they are saying that the tattoo should be in those spots, and I think the spots are wrong. We don't want to confuse people about where the tattoos were placed. I'm trying to get a picture of Gruner's tattoo - that would explain where they went. So just the arm showing no marks is best. Also, the red lettering on the Buchenwald picture doesn't read, and it's saying something important. I like the solemn music and the documentary feel to it. I like the statement: Many have asked to see it. That really hits. Maybe all those words of fake, imposter, and so on might be overkill. Just the question, and then leading people to the website would be just right.

Vlad, you should work on a video like this one using the Buchenwald Famous Photo page ... lots of visual material to work with there. If you do, consider letting me preview it just to make sure it's accurate. I think that would be a blockbuster. Of course, the tattoo issue is too.

Videos can do so much. I'm grateful to you for producing these. We need people who are really good at audio-visual material.

Thank you for your comments, Carolyn!

With regards to the placement of the tattoo, using the description of where 'they' say they have been placed, it's most logical it would be in this area since it's the most meaty part of the inside-left forearm. I imagine that most people won't even know what they're looking for until after the slides with the circles where they realize they "remembered hearing about the tattoos of Auschwitz." In this case, the point as been made. [If the tattoos were supposedly done as alleged, there would be millions of photos for us to use in order to properly indicate the circles since it would have been a structured plan. The photos I've seen and point to the opposite as they've appeared on multiple parts of the arm, i.e. top part, inside part, top of the wrist, inside near the elbow, etc.]

For the words such as fake and imposter: these are Grüner's implications. By having them with a question-mark in the end, I'm not making a statement of agreement - more or less a frantic "can this really be true!?" statement which leads right to your website link. The video is very neutral, using Grüner's words as a Holocaust Survivor as the main crutch. It's pretty bulletproof this way.

I will visit the Buchenwald photo and see how I can transform that into a video. I've decided that these videos should be as short and hard-hitting as possible. The trouble we seem to run into is that we've clearly debunked the holohoax in every way using science and logic - the problem is that these are very long presentations and, let's face it, the average folks today don't really sit down to "read" about anything besides what's happening on their soap operas or sports.

I'll will see can be done with the Buchenwald photo.

[Cloud]

Thank you, Cloud. Does the downloaded video stay in tact if the original is removed? A lot of times, if a host removes the file, the copy is rendered useless.

Yes, the video file is saved to your computer. Even if YouTube takes down their copy of the video, you will still have your own personal copy on your PC to view and upload again to either YouTube or other video hosting sites.

I recently tried uploading One Third of the Holocaust to YouTube, but it was instantly rejected for Terms of Use violation.

[Carolyn Yeager]

Okay, I have made and posted a new video to replace the one they just took down.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWsjkT1qjnU[/youtube]
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWsjkT1qjnU)

I took a completely neutral approach (didn't speak and just used music and text) and used Miklos Grüner sort of as a crutch, as if to say "these aren't my words, but Miklos Grüner's words". It's only one minute, sort of like a 'commercial', just enough to make a person wonder. (Hopefully this approach will suck in even those who do believe.) There is no swearing, slang or any "disrespect" to the Holohoax Survivors in this video, it's completely academic. This should ensure that it does not get pulled for "hate speech" since I used Grüner's assertion that Wiesel is not who he says he is and doesn't have a tattoo.

If anybody would like the original file, let me know and I'll get it to you. If you have a server/host/website, stick it on there and let me know where it's at. I'm not holding my breath that JewTube won't delete this.

There is now a Downloads page at http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com. It's on the Menu Bar. We have put up your video and Eric's posters so far. There will be more coming. You can tell people about it. I see you have 100 views of your video now. I like the comment by the fellow who told the story of the uncle in New York who was tattooing Jews who were the right age to have been in the camps. So believable. That is why we see tattoos in so many different locations. I'm still waiting to see Gruner's tattoo, to see where it's placed. Why hasn't he ever shown it?

[The Warden]

Thank you, Cloud. Does the downloaded video stay in tact if the original is removed? A lot of times, if a host removes the file, the copy is rendered useless.

The only reason I bring up the lack of audio or video (as of right now) is because Revisionists have always placed physical evidence above documentation and eyewitness testimony. In the future, when Wiesel is long known as a fraud, I don't want someone saying "You have no proof he said that other than the article", and have the reporter recant his story. I tend to hold everyone to the same standard of proof. If there's audio or video proof of him saying what was reported, I'd like someone to have it, in case the Zionists try to get shifty.

So, no one has any audio or video of Wiesel saying he has the A-7713 tattoo at the Dayton speech?
I find it hard to believe anyone would put so much faith in a quote given by the media, of all things, without any other evidence to support it.
This whole story can be debunked by one reporter being "convinced" she misquoted Wiesel.

[Carolyn Yeager]

Thank you, Cloud. Does the downloaded video stay in tact if the original is removed? A lot of times, if a host removes the file, the copy is rendered useless.

The only reason I bring up the lack of audio or video (as of right now) is because Revisionists have always placed physical evidence above documentation and eyewitness testimony. In the future, when Wiesel is long known as a fraud, I don't want someone saying "You have no proof he said that other than the article", and have the reporter recant his story. I tend to hold everyone to the same standard of proof. If there's audio or video proof of him saying what was reported, I'd like someone to have it, in case the Zionists try to get shifty.

So, no one has any audio or video of Wiesel saying he has the A-7713 tattoo at the Dayton speech?
I find it hard to believe anyone would put so much faith in a quote given by the media, of all things, without any other evidence to support it.
This whole story can be debunked by one reporter being "convinced" she misquoted Wiesel.

Why don't you contact the reporter and get a confirmation -- the email and phone number are there. You can also ask if it was filmed or recorded. Better record your conversation, if you call.

[The Warden]

I'll take that as a "no".
Seeing that you're one of the ones overseeing the Wiesel website, I suggest you get on the phone.
Your behavior hasn't warranted any help from me.

[Carolyn Yeager]

It must be after the 1967 war and Elie is around 40 years old.

The picture in the book, before the one Eric posted, shows a very skinny Elie (sort of like a outer-spaceling) standing in front of the Western Wall in Jerusalem after the Six-Day War. He is dressed the same. So it is 1967.

This particular question is answered.

[twila]

By looking at this vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr8_JaKde2Q

We can say for sure that the weasel has no tattoo anywhere on his lower left arm (except under his watch / watch band).

Correct?


Carolyn Yeager:

It's also my understanding that in 1944 tattoos were all put on the outside of the left forearm, easy to see... The authorities certainly didn't put them any which way they felt like; there had to have been a clear-cut procedure.