In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby sans concession » 9 years 4 months ago (Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:01 pm)

In France, a writer, father of eight, is in prison for his historical research


And the so-called free press says nothing about it!


With a wife and eight children, the Frenchman Vincent Reynouard, aged 41, is a chemical engineer by training, a graduate of the ISMRA (“Institute of sciences of atomic matter and radiation”) in Caen (Normandy). He readily presents himself as a traditionalist Catholic and does not hide his ultra-conservative political opinions. But, most important, he publicly disputes, in his DVDs and writings, the conventional version of Second World War history. He is one of those researchers who declare themselves to be "revisionists" and who are called "deniers" by others because they do not believe in the existence of homicidal gas chambers in the wartime German concentration camps.

In 2005, Reynouard wrote and sent to numerous tourism offices, museums and town halls a 16-page brochure entitled "Holocaust? Here’s what’s kept hidden from you…”, in which he took a view altogether opposite to that of academic history. French justice immediately pounced upon him.

His trial in 2007 at the criminal court in Saverne (Alsace) resulted in a sentence of one year’s imprisonment, a fine of 10,000 euros and an order to pay damages of 3,000 euros to the antiracist league “LICRA”. In June 2008 the court of appeal in Colmar upheld the prison sentence and ordered him to pay a total of 60,000 euros (a 20,000 euro fine, damages, mandatory publication of the ruling and court fees). Severity as never seen before.

Since he resides in Belgium, France launched a European arrest warrant for Reynouard in order to make him serve the prison sentence ordered by the Colmar court. On July 9th he was imprisoned by the Belgian police, pending his extradition to France. All of which leads him to say: "When people can think of no other way but imprisonment to get rid of a verbal opponent, it’s because they have no arguments."

Conclusion: A 41-year-old father of eight is currently in prison for his historical research, because of the Gayssot Act.

This Act of the French parliament (“article 24bis” of the law governing the press), having come into effect upon publication in the Journal Officiel on July 14th 1990, prohibits the "disputing (...) of the existence of one or more crimes against humanity as defined by Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal [known as the Nuremberg Tribunal] in annex to the London Agreement of August 8th, 1945. "

In my book Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs (Oser Dire publishers, [Belgium], 2009), I recall that this freedom-killing law has been strongly criticised in the past by such personalities as the French academician Simone Veil; the Permanent Secretary of the French Academy, Hélène Carrère d'Encausse; the government ministers Jean Foyer, Jacques Toubon, Alain Peyrefitte; the historians Henri Amouroux, Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Annie Kriegel, Francois Furet, Alain Besançon, Jacques Willequet and François Bédarida; the founder of the Hannah Arendt Research Institute, Chantal Delsol; the 1988 Nobel laureate for economics, Maurice Allais; the writers Michel Tournier, Louis Pauwels, Michel Houellebecq, Philip Murray, Jean Daniel, Vladimir Volkoff, Michel Rachline and Alain Robbe-Grillet; the judges Philippe Bilger, Alain Marsaud and Raoul Béteille; the legal scholars Olivier Duhamel, Anne-Marie Le Pourhiet, Emmanuelle Duverger, André Decoq and Guy Carcassonne; the lawyers Jacques Vergès and John Bastardi Daumont; the philosopher Paul Ricœur; the comedian Bruno Gaccio; defenders of the freedom of expression like the founder of Reporters Sans Frontières Robert Ménard (who denounces it as a "thought police") and Gabriel Cohn-Bendit; the journalists Dominique Jamet, Delfeil de Ton, Alain Rollat, Albert du Roy, Philippe Tesson, Jacques Julliard and Ivan Rioufol; also by the former president of the Ligue des droits de l’homme, historian Madeleine Rebérioux. Abroad, the American linguist Noam Chomsky has declared himself an absolute opponent of it. For the Belgian physicist and intellectual Jean Bricmont, "the Gayssot Act is a legal regression of several centuries”. As for Presidents Hugo Chávez and Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad, they have strongly condemned the repression resulting from this law.

Henceforth it falls to us to defend free expression in deed and not just in theory. Why is no one heard publically denouncing the present fate of Vincent Reynouard? What are Reporters Sans Frontières, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch doing? No organ of the media, either French or foreign, has informed public opinion of this case. Such silence is abnormal.

Personally, I have decided to act as a historian and as a citizen, and to make it known, through this press release, how appalled I am at the fact that, in our country, we have a man thrown into prison for his opinions, however unusual, shocking and controversial they may be. Such treatment is not worthy of France or her intellectual tradition. It is not for the law to say how historical truth is set down: in a free country, that is the task of historians. The Gayssot Act, which restricts the historian’s freedom, is unworthy of a democratic State; it is a wicked law. I therefore ask for its immediate repeal.

I hope to be joined soon by dozens, hundreds, thousands of other people unable to remain indifferent in the face of a scandal that seriously harms the image of France and flouts the spirit of the Republic.

Those who wish to sign this communiqué along with me can send me their names and contact information at the address [email protected]. It is not a question of supporting Vincent Reynouard’s religious, political or historical ideas but of defending his right to express them. To challenge them, an open, democratic, fair and honest debate will suffice.

We shall go over the results of this request for signatures towards the end of September.
Meanwhile, thank you for circulating this text to the utmost extent.



Paul-Eric Blanrue,
Historian,
Founder of the research group Cercle Zététique,
Author of Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs (Oser Dire publishers, [Belgium], 2009)

Source : http://sarkozyisraeletlesjuifs.blogspot.com/

Image
Last edited by sans concession on Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:56 am, edited 3 times in total.

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 4 months ago (Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:14 pm)

I enclose to this topic the last release received from Vincent


NEWS from Vincent REYNOUARD


Message of July 25th, 2010


Dear friends,

First of all, thanks to all of you who, following my detention, have written to me here at Forest prison. Having neither envelopes nor stamps in sufficient number, I cannot answer, and I'm sorry for that. Still, thank you for your showings of support, which go straight to my heart. I'll ask those who wish to write me to enclose in their letters a stamped envelope (at "Europe" postal rate) for the reply.

On July 23rd the judges in Brussels declared that the arrest warrant issued for me by France was valid. Therefore extradition is now unavoidable. It will doubtless come about in ten days' time or so.

My lawyers have asked me to take certain actions to try to avoid prison in France, or at least minimize the length of detention. I shall do nothing of the sort. In effect, I want it to be possible to say that in 2010, in France, a father of eight children, aged from 1 to 17, languishes in prison simply for having publicly expressed revisionist arguments.

I want it known that in France, in 2010, a father of eight whose only weapon is a pen languishes in prison.

I'll be told in reply that, for now, 99.9% of people don't care. And it's true. But I repeat: we revisionists look further ahead, towards the day when, with the help of events, moods will change. Perhaps we'll be dead then. But when future researchers, unhindered by current taboos, study this history – our history – of the period 1990-2010 and see the repression of which the revisionists have been victims, then the conclusion to make will be obvious.

As I write, I think of my dear wife and my dear children.

I think of their state of mind... Yesterday, in the visiting room, Marina was crying. She told me my 14-year-old son wasn't eating and that the five "little ones" wanted their father. That hurts but, beside the fact that the Truth holds certain rights over us, if I carry on the revisionist struggle – the implications of which run well beyond the realm of History – I carry it on precisely for my children, as well as for other peoples' children, for the Palestinians, for Europe, and, more generally, for a world rid of this New World Order built on the ruins of the 3rd Reich.

Whatever the hardships, I will never give in. The cops, judges and prisons will make no difference. The seed has been sown; it will germinate and, some day, it will grow.

Vincent REYNOUARD

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

gbrecht
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:43 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby gbrecht » 9 years 3 months ago (Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:28 am)

I always found this interesting: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Oradour-s ... ouard.html

The best part of this whole story, is after the German soldiers supposedly begin massacring the entire town, they decide to herd a few hundred people in a church, and set off a "smoke bomb", in order to asphyxiate them. They are already lining up and shooting everyone else why would they cram a bunch of people in a church, set off a "smoke bomb" and asphyxiate them instead of just using bullets.

Also, Madame Rouffanche's story is quite amazing as well, after this "smoke bomb" goes off, she escapes, climbs a ladder, jumps out a window landing 9(apparently) feet down, a woman with a baby follows her out, the baby's cries alert the SS, and they machine gun them down. She is shot(5 times so she says), crawls off to a garden, and hides in a pea patch until she is rescued the following day at 5PM. Are people really this moronic to believe this pure shit?

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 3 months ago (Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:58 am)

NEWS


Vincent is imprisoned in the prison of Valenciennes where he is going to execute the punishment ordered by the Court of Appeal of Colmar (on 1 year of imprisonment).

His wife got on the phone the social worker who said to her that according to remissions he could be released at the end of January / beginning February (considering the specificity of the offence, we can wonder about these remissions: shall we grant them to him?).

As well as in the case of Ernst Zündel, Vincent can receive from the mail, accompanied possibly with photocopies of articles, but neither books, reviews.

Here's his address:

Monsieur Vincent Reynouard
Centre pénitencier de Valenciennes
N° d'écrou: 33034
75 rue Lomprez
B.P. 80455
59322 VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE
Last edited by sans concession on Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2362
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 9 years 3 months ago (Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:34 pm)

Wow, I have huge admiration of Vincent Reynouard. What a great guy and his sacrifice for truth is something I'm in awe of.

Thesaint
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:34 pm
Location: England

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby Thesaint » 9 years 3 months ago (Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:24 pm)

A very brave and noble man.

My name(and hopefully many others also) will be on the communique and I will write Vincent to convey my thanks and support.
"We didn't call survivors," says Lipstadt, "because first of all we didn't want to subject them to cross-examination by this guy. He (Irving) would have destroyed them."
- Jerusalem Post 6/16/00

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 3 months ago (Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:35 am)

What concrete helps to bring to the political prisoner Vincent Reynouard?


We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements to Mr. Vincent Reynouard:



M. Vincent Reynouard
N° 33034
Maison d'arrêt de Valenciennes
BP 80 455
F-59 322 - VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE


Image
Last edited by sans concession on Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 3 months ago (Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:00 pm)

A MESSAGE FROM VINCENT REYNOUARD

REGARDING THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION



The courageous petition launched in my behalf by Paul-Eric Blanrue again brings up the matter of limits to freedom of expression. In the name of what, exactly, might such limits be imposed? To answer this crucial question, let’s ask ourselves: why, in general, is freedom ever limited? [1] The image of a fence with a sign on it reading "Forbidden: danger” seems to me the best of answers: the purpose of limiting freedom is to protect.

First of all comes the protection of the individual, the integrity of his body, his life, his reputation and, in some societies where religion is prominent, his soul. Hence all laws against calls to violence, incitement to murder, insults, defamation, invasion of privacy and also, in certain societies, blasphemy and heresy.

Then, on a more general level, comes the protection of society as guarantor of the common good, therefore of civil peace and the lives of citizens. Thus justification is offered for laws against subversion, whether direct (calls to revolt...) or indirect (promotion of ideas adverse to the reigning ideology).

Naturally these restrictive laws, which reflect a people’s culture, will be liable to vary according to time and place. Moreover, the problem of excess of power may arise. Still, such abuse as occurs never calls into question the principle itself. That is why I do not condemn, per se, the existence of laws limiting freedom, including that of expression. But it is essential to prevent excesses of power, and to speak out against them when they happen.

Are the so-called "anti-revisionist" laws unjust? That is the question here. Several arguments have been put forth in support of the answer “no”.

I shall quickly dismiss the first of these, which consists in invoking the "suffering" of victims who should be protected from intolerable affronts. This argument might be of some worth if the revisionists denied the existence of anti-semitic persecution under Hitler and likened the concentration lager to holiday camps. But that is not at all so. Contrary to the message conveyed in the media, the revisionists are not "deniers"; if they denounce the lies of the official version, they try at the same time to discover and explain what really happened. And in this truer history, the victims’ suffering remains tragically present.

A second argument offered to justify anti-revisionist laws consists in asserting that the "revisionist enterprise (...) is anti-semitism, which is not an opinion but an offence". [2]

To begin, I shall reply that if the link between revisionism and anti-semitism were so plain to see, so obvious, then there would have been no need, in France for example, for an anti-revisionist law; the 1972 statute punishing racism (and thus anti-semitism) would have sufficed.

In reality, that link is so unobvious that it takes some clever reasoning to assert its existence. This reasoning, as I have heard it several times from the mouths of lawyers speaking against us in our court cases (I think especially of barristers Korman and Lorach), can be summed up as follows:

"For centuries, anti-Semites have conveyed the image of Jews who would lie and use dishonest schemes in order to steal money and, in so doing, become the most powerful people on Earth (cf. the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion). That is exactly the message of Holocaust deniers, because they say the Jews are lying with their Shoah stories, that they are mighty enough to impose this lie of theirs on the whole world and then take advantage of it to steal money from Germany, Switzerland, Austria, etc. Conclusion: Holocaust denial is a modern form of traditional anti-semitism. With today’s anti-semites, it’s no longer: ‘Death to the Jews!’, but rather: ‘The Jews didn’t die!’; the end goal, however, is the same."

In this line of reasoning, one sentence is crucial: "They say the Jews are lying with their Shoah stories." Indeed. But what if, in effect, the Shoah is just a myth? What’s to be said of those who have steadily avoided any debate for over 30 years in order to be able to go on telling their tales? Are they not witting liars? What’s to be said of the laws passed nearly all over Europe to protect this historical lie, and this one alone? Are they not proof of the power of certain Jewish lobbies? And what of the billions paid to Israel by Germany in “reparations” for the (alleged) genocide? Doesn’t it all add up to an enormous swindle?

It’s there to see: the case made for the anti-revisionist laws by their Jewish advocates is based wholly on the reality of the (alleged) "Holocaust". If that reality becomes the subject of a lively debate, the case collapses like any house of cards. Therefore, before making it, they ought to allow free research and a free confrontation of points of view. An open and fair debate about the (alleged) "Holocaust" should be permitted.

However, it is precisely that peremptory argument which is used to forbid not just any debate, but also any public expression of revisionist arguments. Consequently, the situation is this: we are told that the "Holocaust" is historical truth and that to deny it amounts to anti-semitism. But anti-semitism is an offence, therefore disputing the reality of the “Holocaust" must be prohibited.

Stripped of all those intermediate steps, the argument
becomes: “the ‘Holocaust’ is a reality, there is no discussing that; therefore those who want to discuss it must be condemned." This is totally – frightfully – arbitrary.

A third argument in favour of anti-revisionist laws consists in saying that questioning of the "Holocaust" aims at re-establishing National Socialism.

Doubtless. But if, indeed, the Shoah is only a slander, then the people who are accused of it and, more generally, the regime so accused must be rehabilitated on this point. It’s only right.

I shall be told in reply that the revisionist undertaking seeks, ultimately, an overall rehabilitation of National Socialism, so as to pave the way again for that ideology.

­— Must I infer from this that, once rid of the number 1 charge against it, Hitlerism would exert an irresistible appeal on the masses, so positive an ideology would it then be?

— Good God, no!, will come the retort. With or without the Shoah, Nazism remains a hateful ideology by its imperialism, its contempt for others and its absolute denial of individual freedom.

— Then what are you afraid of? Since that ideology is such a horror, why are you afraid that people might let it be restored? And then, especially as, with or without the Shoah, National Socialism remains indefensible, why this law making it an offence to question the existence of crimes against humanity?

It’s plain to see: far from justifying the existence of the Gayssot Act, this third argument turns against those who let it loose. For in the end it shows that for the anti-revisionists, it’s a question of defending – protecting – not a historical truth but rather a political "truth" that serves as their weapon in an ideological struggle. The alleged "Holocaust" ensures that it will never be possible to hold a serene and fair debate allowing people objectively to compare the relative appropriateness of liberal ideals and Fascist ideals. With history locked shut, political discussion is locked shut. A glaring example of abuse of power!

This leaves a fourth argument, Zionist in essence. "In denying the Holocaust”, we are told, “you want to undermine the legitimacy of Israel, and thus make a new ‘Holocaust’ possible."

First, let me emphasise that these geopolitical considerations have no right intervening in a controversy that, by its nature, stands exclusively within the area of History. The Germans either did or did not exterminate the Jews between 1941 and 1945. It's one or the other, and the correct answer cannot depend on current events in the Middle East. In this debate, it’s the historian who must answer, not the geopolitical specialist and still less the Zionist.

I’ll add, however, that the truth about the alleged "Holocaust" will necessarily have repercussions in the Middle East. Since the year 1945 (indeed, since 1942) the Zionists have been using the Allies’ war lies to support their projects. It’s no accident that Israel emerged less than two years after the end of the great Nuremberg trial, which made the myth official. With no Shoah, Israel wouldn’t have seen the light of day. That being the case, with the collapse of the myth the Jewish State will, necessarily, collapse.

Will there consequently be a new "Holocaust"? I don’t think so, although there will certainly, inevitably be instances where things get out of hand in Palestine. But what would you expect? One cannot, with impunity, maintain a situation of injustice for more than 60 years running... Some day or other there will be a price to pay. Personally, I think the Jews will gain much in evacuating Israel peacefully rather than staying on doggedly till the day – the inevitable day – their expulsion comes about.

Even though it may seem cynical, I’ll state here that, all things considered, the victory of revisionism would be a lesser evil for the Zionists.

The conclusion of all this? It’s that nothing, absolutely nothing, justifies the so-called anti-revisionist laws. They are only abuses of power perpetrated by individuals afraid of certain geopolitical and political discussions. Individuals hoping to maintain, for as long as possible, a status quo that’s to their own liking.

For the moment, the peoples of the Western world condone, wittingly or not, this myth. They accept it because they see or feel, vaguely, that the New World Order, guarantor of their hedonistic impulses, finds in the "Holocaust" a weapon enabling it to prevent thoroughly any bothersome discussion and thus, any traumatic calling into question.

No matter that it’s a slander proffered against millions of people (from Hitler to Pope Pius XII, along with bodies like the Red Cross); no matter that this slander is also the source of the ongoing tragedy of an entire people: the Palestinian people. "I’ve got Internet, my laptop, my flat screen TV, etc., that's where I place my ideals in life. As for the rest, I just hope that, with time, everything will turn out all right and everyone else can enjoy my standard of living..."

This near-universal indifference must not, however, weigh down on us. For our duty is to stand up to the lies, the injustice and the slander. We must therefore act without concern for success or failure. We must ceaselessly repeat: the alleged homicidal "gas chambers" in the wartime German camps did not exist, the "Holocaust" is a myth, the "six million" a delirious estimate and the anti-revisionist laws an abuse of power unworthy of an enlightened society.

People find fault with me for being a "desperado", for asserting my traditional Catholicism and my National Socialism. Most of them have never read me. They know neither what my Catholicism is nor what my National Socialism is. Let them start by reading me. Afterwards we can discuss things in the concrete.

The forces we’re fighting against are very powerful. But as they’re grounded in lies, their feet are made of clay. Take the example of repression: thanks to a tailor-made law the mighty can hunt us down, put us on trial, convict us, steal our money, tear us from our families and throw us between four grim walls. At the moment, with the people an accomplice by their approval or fearful silence, this mode of action may well appear frighteningly efficient.

But the day when, subsequent to external events, minds change and taboos falter, the treatment we’ve received thus far will bear powerful witness for us and against them. People will look back at today and say: “What?! They had only their pens; they demanded a fair debate to pit the two arguments against each other and you, you who had millions, you with your radio and television networks, newspapers and cinema, you hunted them down, convicted them, ruined them, threw them in prison, tore them from their families?! – They were anti-semites, Fascists, Nazis, you say? Oh dear! But an argument’s worth doesn’t depend on the person who makes it: its value, if any, is intrinsic. – They threatened public safety, did they? Oh dear! Amidst the din from your televisions and the rest, their voices weren’t a cry or even a whisper, but a mere murmur. But for you, that murmur was too much. You must really have feared the power of their message to react that way. However, only the truth has any power. That’s enough for me to conclude who, in this matter, was telling the truth."

That is why, today, we have to suffer. Contrary to what some think, our suffering is not in vain; it’s like seeds that we sow.

Tomorrow, the harvest will be plentiful.

Vincent Reynouard


Prison of Forest, Belgium, August 18, 2010

_________________________________________

[1] I speak here of freedom in the modern sense of the word, that is, individual freedom grounded in the Rights of Man, according to which there is no such thing as human nature, the individual constructing himself each day in line with his own will, a will which, in order to find expression, must be guaranteed essential freedoms.


[2] Argument developed once again recently by the barrister of the “Association of sons and daughters of Jews deported from France”, Mr Didier Bouthors, before the Cour de Cassation, France’s highest court (see the French Catholic daily La Croix, May 10, 2010).

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 1 month ago (Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:53 am)

With Paul-Eric Blanrue, against the Gayssot Act and for Vincent Reynouard

It's wrong when we are denied the right to challenge common beliefs or culture, especially when everyone knows that the books are written by the victors. It doesn't stem from hate to say "I don't believe" whatever. This anti free speech stuff always irks me. This is nothing like a call to violent action even. (Steve Wozniak)

That is the comment with which Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computers (see his biography at Steve Wozniak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), has recently accompanied his signature of the petition launched in France by historian Paul-Eric Blanrue against the Gayssot Act and in favour of Vincent Reynouard. The Gayssot Act of July 13, 1990 prohibits the diffusion of historical revisionism on pain of imprisonment and fine.

On the grounds of this law, Vincent Reynouard, aged 41 and a father of eight, was in 2007 sentenced to one year in prison without probation and ordered to pay about €70,000 for having written a 16-page pamphlet entitled Holocauste ? Ce que l'on vous cache...("Holocaust? What’s being kept hidden from you...").At the request of the French authorities, who had issued a "European arrest warrant" for him, he was arrested by the Belgian police last July in Brussels, where he lived with his family, then jailed in Belgium for over fifty days before being extradited to France. He is now incarcerated in Valenciennes in northern France.

And throughout the Western world the mainstream media ignore the fact that in France an honest man, father of eight children, is serving a year in prison and must pay €70,000 because he authored a piece of writing of sixteen pages.

For his part Noam Chomsky has stated his position in a letter against the Gayssot Act and in defence of Vincent Reynouard. You may find that letter at The full statement from Noam Chomsky to the release of Vincent and the repeal of the law Gayssot | Comité de soutien à Vincent Reynouard.Currently there are a thousand signers of the petition.

I invite you to add your signature to theirs once you have read the English version of the press release, posted at French author Vincent Reynouard sentenced to one year in prison presenting Mr Reynouard’s case and showing the e-mail address to which to send your name; please indicate your place of residence and, if you wish, your profession.

Thank you.

Best wishes,

Robert Faurisson, (November 5, 2010)

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, a writer, is in prison for his historical res

Postby sans concession » 9 years 2 weeks ago (Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:00 am)

On Bradley Smith, Vincent Reynouard, and freedom of expression


From a Frenchman, Frédéric Agnes. Robert Faurisson


Hello.

I have just watched Bradley SMITH’s youtube video entitled Coffee with Bradley Smith : Taboo at UC San Diego ? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_mkLhdAsFY).

As I read Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist Part I a dozen years ago, I can tell you it contains absolutely nothing ‘so dangerous that students should be protected about’, to quote Bradley Smith’s own words. This book is very interesting, pleasant, and even funny. I strongly recommend that you read it. It is the kind of book that may change your life. Feel absolutely free to advertise it.

When Bradley Smith talks about ‘imprisonment of men and women in Western nations (…) for thought crimes’, he is absolutely right (unfortunately, I might add). In my own country, France, one of my fellow countrymen, Vincent REYNOUARD, is currently in jail because he distributed one of his own research works. Do not simply believe me. Check for yourself: write to Vincent (He is fluent in English). Here is his address in jail:

Vincent Reynouard
N°33034
Maison d’arrêt de Valenciennes
BP 80 455
F-59322 VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE


The law that caused him to be sent to prison, the ‘Gayssot’ Act, forbids challenging the Nuremberg Trial version of History.

There is an on-line petition against this law, and against Vincent REYNOUARD’s imprisonment at: http://abrogeonslaloigayssot.blogspot.com

Please read it, and decide for yourself what you think of it. The petition is an international one: it can be signed by anybody from any country – indeed, American citizens have already signed it. If you are in favour of freedom of expression, just sign it, too, by sending an e-mail to [email protected] with your first name, family name, and city.

I hope I will have the pleasure to see you on this petition very soon. And, of course, I hope I will have the pleasure to read an ad for Bradley Smith’s Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist in The Guardian !

All the best.

Frédéric AGNES

Paris, France

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

athenarena
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:32 pm

Re: In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby athenarena » 9 years 2 weeks ago (Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:28 pm)

Even the UN will overlook this blatent denial of the rights that their declaration enshrined him because it is a Revisionist that got arrested. What has the EU come to even though it is France and I am not surprised at all.

God bless him. Keep your head up. He has not committed a crime worthy of losing that much money and imprisonment.

NSNO,
Athenarena

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby sans concession » 9 years 1 week ago (Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:50 pm)

We don't forget!


Image


December 6th


Vincent REYNOUARD


Imprisoned for 150 days!


We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements to Mr. Vincent Reynouard (He's fluent in English):


Vincent REYNOUARD
Centre pénitencier de Valenciennes
N° d’écrou: 33034
75 rue Lomprez
B.P. 80455
59322 VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

User avatar
Cloud
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:27 pm
Location: The Land of Political Correctness

Re: In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby Cloud » 9 years 1 week ago (Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:25 pm)

Not to be rude, but does the OP ever make any real posts? All it seems to do is spam.

Ilikerealhistory
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:50 pm

Re: In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby Ilikerealhistory » 9 years 5 days ago (Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:46 pm)

Cloud wrote: All it seems to do is spam.



...and basically the same thing in multiple threads.

User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Re: In France, writer imprisoned for historical research

Postby sans concession » 8 years 9 months ago (Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:30 am)

February 18th - Vincent Reynouard's Birthday

Image

Imprisoned for more than 200 days


Vincent Reynouard, aged 41 and a father of eight, was in 2007 sentenced to one year in prison without probation and ordered to pay about €70,000 for having written a 16-page pamphlet entitled : Holocauste ? Ce que l'on vous cache...("Holocaust? What’s being kept hidden from you...").

At the request of the French authorities, who had issued a "European arrest warrant" for him, he was arrested by the Belgian police last July in Brussels, where he lived with his family, then jailed in Belgium for over fifty days before being extradited to France. He is now incarcerated in Valenciennes in northern France.

And throughout the Western world the mainstream media ignore the fact that in France an honest man, father of eight children, is serving a year in prison and must pay €70,000 because he authored a piece of writing of sixteen pages.


We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements to Mr. Vincent Reynouard:

M. Vincent Reynouard
N° 33034
Maison d'arrêt de Valenciennes
75 rue Lomprez
BP 80 455
F-59 322 - VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests