Franciszek Piper wrote:Despite the fact that the tens of thousands of prisoners who survived Auschwitz were witnesses to the crimes committed there; despite the fact that they left behind thousands of depositions, accounts, and memoirs; despite the fact that considerable quantities of documents, photographs, and material objects remain from the camp—despite all of this, there are people and organizations who deny that hundreds of thousands of people were murdered in this camp, that gas chambers operated there, or that the crematoria could burn several thousand corpses per day. In other words, they deny that Auschwitz was the scene of genocide.
When will this guy get it? It doesn’t matter if he put forward 100.000 eyewitnesses or 100.000 tons of documents or 100.000 pieces of that junk they have in their museum, we are looking for THE document. THE document will tell us how the Germans made a functional homicidal gas chamber and manage to dispose the bodies without almost a trace. Revisionists have smashed all his evidence and he knows it. But he must lie to the average reader so they won’t know.
Further below on the page:
Franciszek Piper wrote:
- First: they limited the written record of their crime to a minimum;
- Second: they falsified the record, to the degree that technical and organizations made its existence necessary;
- Third: they destroyed the superfluous and the most incriminating part of the record, once it had served its purpose, in the final phase of the Third Reich. They destroyed not only documents. They also destroyed the mass killing apparatus and liquidated the witnesses.
Sounds familiar? But wait a minute, didn’t he say in the first sentence; “despite the fact that considerable quantities of documents, photographs, and material objects remain”?
On page 2 it continues:
Franciszek Piper wrote:The literature that denies the Holocaust and genocide sometimes takes the form of pseudo-scientific studies furnished with scholarly apparatus in the form of footnotes, extensive bibliographies, and indexes, intended to create an impression of credibility and full objectivity. More frequently, however, these are essays dripping with irony, sarcasm, and mockery. This kind of denial arises out of a certain world-view based on prejudices, xenophobia, and nationalism.
Mr Piper, we haven’t seen any scientific reports from your side of the aisle, people like Germar Rudolf, Jürgen Graf, Thomas Kues or Carlo Mattogno, just to mention some names. Oh yes, I forgot your “Krakow-report” which Germar Rudolf shredded completely. And while we are at it, the Kola-reports from Belzec and Sobibór wasn’t any hit either.
On page 3:
Franciszek Piper wrote:The deniers of the Holocaust and genocide attack three facts in particular:
According to Professor Yisrael Gutman of the Yad Vashem Memorial Institute in Israel, the use of the term “Polish concentration camps” is a form of Holocaust denial. It is a conscious or unconscious way of changing victims into perpetrators and an attempt to blur the question of responsibility for the crime.
- the existence of the gas chambers
- the capacity of the crematoria in the camps, which far exceeded the natural death rate
- the enormous scale of the crime.
Yes Mr Piper, we haven’t seen any functional homicidal German gas chamber, only reconstructions that couldn’t function as a homicidal gas chamber. The capacity of the crematoria we know today, it doesn’t exceed the natural death rate when typhus was raging. And “the enormous scale of the crime” is we still puzzled about. Where were the organization and the budget?
Franciszek Piper wrote:Teams of pseudo-experts posing as tourists clandestinely gouge chunks of plaster from the walls of the gas chambers and later submit them to chemical analysis for the presence of hydrogen cyanide compounds. The quantity of these compounds is always, of course, too small to state that people were killed in the gas chambers.
See answer about the “Krakow-report”.
On page 5 we find this beauty:
Franciszek Piper wrote:A certified German chemist, Germar Rudolf, holder of a doctorate from the respected Max Planck Institute (which totally disavowed Rudolf’s efforts in the field), carried out similar “research” in 1991-1992. Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months imprisonment in Germany in 1994. He escaped to England, and from there to the USA, which in turn deported him in 2005 to Germany, where he was convicted once again of denying the existence of the gas chambers and sentenced to a year and a half behind bars.
Mr Piper, why don’t you present any refuting of Germar Rudolf’s findings? Why do you only smear him? You do the same on page 4 with Leuchter and on the same page as Rudolf you smear Walter Lüftl too.
On the last pages he continues with his smear on all known revisionists. It’s the same mantra over again.
Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/h/index.php? ... mitstart=0