smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9842
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Hannover » 8 years 5 months ago (Fri Mar 25, 2011 4:35 pm)

Since the "Holocau$t Industry" cannot refute Revisionist research, the Industry's tactic of last resort is perfectly described in this Communist Party directive issued in 1943:
When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic ... to discredit them. In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become 'fact' in the public mind.

It is incredibly easy to debunk the ridiculous tales; just look under the rock and see for yourself.

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd and impossible 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 8 years 5 months ago (Sun Mar 27, 2011 12:10 am)

That's interesting. Where did you find the directive?

The Warden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: 'Murica!

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby The Warden » 8 years 5 months ago (Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:09 pm)

I like the term "obstructionist".
It implies successful stoppage, or at least a delay or setback.
Why the Holocaust Industry exists:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2A81P6YGw_c

User avatar
Blogbuster
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:35 pm

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Blogbuster » 8 years 5 months ago (Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:21 am)

An interesting thread.

I found this one on the Hate Blog Watch forum, that has a similar implication in the way revisionists are viewed:

http://hateblogwatch.yuku.com/topic/255 ... s-on-RODOH

BB
Blog Buster!

Mojo
Member
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Mojo » 8 years 5 months ago (Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:23 pm)

It's a trick, we always use it!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUGVPBO9_cA[/youtube]

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9842
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Hannover » 8 years 5 months ago (Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:29 pm)

Carto's Cutlass Supreme wrote:That's interesting. Where did you find the directive?

CCS, here you go:

http://www.thehiddenevil.com/techniques.asp
According to author Perloff, a document released by the House Committee on Un-American Activities, on September 23, 1956 entitled, Propaganda and the Alert Citizen outlined the tactics reportedly used by the Establishment to discredit opposition.
Quoting from this document, Perloff wrote, "The tactic used had a prototype in a directive issued by the Communist Party... It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. ... In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell."

http://alettertothetimes.wordpress.com/ ... -a-primer/
The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism: A Primer
March 11, 2009 by Cassandra Goldman

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: smearing Revisionists / an appropriate quote

Postby Hektor » 8 years 5 months ago (Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:43 pm)

Hannover wrote:...Quoting from this document, Perloff wrote, "The tactic used had a prototype in a directive issued by the Communist Party... It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. ... In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell."
...

That's something to consider, you may win them on all the rational and factual parts of an argument. But they will just resort to namecalling or use any tools from the magic box of social psychology. Thank for the hints to the interesting articles, Hannover. Good reading on this matter.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests