Hans wrote:While Eichmann was as usual playing down is own involvement, the statement is affirmative to the existence of homicidal gas-chambers and homicidal gassings:
The previous posts from Hannover and nathan show exactly the opposite. Eichmann wasn't downplaying his involvement at all. If anything, he was trying to make it sound like he was more involved than the people who supposedly "told him" about these things. According to you, one minute he's saying "If WE
killed the Jews reported by Korherr...", the next you're saying he claims he couldn't watch and didn't participate in the process. Which is it?
Hans wrote:If it is true what Eichmann was saying here, it is clear that homicidal gassings were carried out in Auschwitz.
Completely off base. Let's look at the quote line by line...I never had anything directly to do with the gas chambers, which evolved from early measures like those at Litzmannstadt.
Perhaps he didn't have anything to do with them because they weren't there!
And how does he know they "evolved" when he had nothing to do with them?But I did visit Auschwitz repeatedly. It had an unpleasant smell.
Well there you have it! Proof of the Holocaust! A bad smell at a place he visited!
Seriously, that smell could've been anything from waste water to the water table rising during summer to the piles of shoes we see Believers use as proof.Even today I do not know how the gassing was carried out.
Because they weren't carried out.I never watched the entire process.
Because it wasn't happening.
What part of the process is he claiming to witness anyway?
The "selection"? Laughable.
What's next? He saw Jews in the camps, so that's proof they were killing them?
Maybe if you had Eichmann saying he wore a gas mask and pulled Jews out of the alleged designated rooms, you could make a case, but you don't.
All you have is a guy who sounds exactly as if someone told him "We're going with stories about gas chambers, and we need you to agree, but don't go into detail". Even a man like Hoess, the commandant at Auschwitz, described the matter to me in a rather rose-colored way.
Yes, all day long with this "told me" and "described".
Yet he "wasn't involved", "didn't watch", "didn't know how it worked", etc.
For someone who was allegedly involved in wiping out the Jewish people in Europe, a practice that Hans insists was happening based on nothing more than hearsay but seems to be the foundation of all thing Holocaust, he never really did much of anything or even saw anything. Why is it that everyone seemed to "describe" things to him, but he can't seem to "describe" much of anything?
Hans wrote:But more detailed is his description of the homicidal gassing in Chelmno:
Later in that same winter Müller sent me to watch Jews being gassed in the Litzmannstadt [Lodz] area of central Poland.
You mean the same gassings that he can't describe? And couldn't watch?
I must stress that the gassing was not done on his orders, but Müller did want to know about it. He was a very thorough government official.
Is this more "downplaying", Hans? Because it certainly seems like he knows who's giving orders all of a sudden.
And he even knows what other officers "want to know"!
But we do have more solid proof of the Holocaust right here...
Someone was "thorough"!
A revelation indeed.
Arriving at Litzmannstadt, I drove out to the designated place where a thousand Jews were about to board buses. The buses were normal, high-windowed affairs with all their windows closed. During the trip, I was told, the carbon monoxide from the exhaust pipe was conducted into the interior of the buses. It was intended to kill the passengers immediately.
There it is! He saw Jews in the camps! lol.
Just to lock things up, he also witnessed buses, which he could describe in great detail! At least, the outside of the buses.
Much like someone who toured the camp on occasion and happened to notice a bus used for transport on one of his trips and used this image due to a lack of any other information.
Obviously, more solid proof of a Holocaust, right Hans? lol
And notice yet another "I was told".
That seems to be commonplace with all this Holocaust nonsense, but no one seems to be the ones who actually performed these fables.
Not only that, but Eichmann seems to be "downplaying" his role again by knowing the amount of time the prisoners would be killed.
Or is that another contradiction?
Based on a little something called "hearsay" in any modern day courtroom which would be stricken from the record immediately.
A doctor who was there suggested that I look at the people inside one bus through a peephole in the driver's seat. I refused. I couldn't look.
But he didn't!
Or maybe he couldn't look because there were no gassings!
The simple solution is always the best.
This was the first time that I had seen and heard such a thing and my knees were buckling under me. I had been told that the whole process took only three minutes, but the buses rode along for about a quarter of an hour.
Buckling knees? From what? He didn't look at anything, he didn't know how anything worked, and he was supposedly downplaying.
Hans wrote:The same description Eichmann gave in the manuscript Götzen he wrote in Israeli prison. The interesting thing is that both the Sassen-interviews and the manuscript Götzen contain elements of denial and relativization of the Holocaust, yet they both confirm the fact of homicidal gassings. So let aside that both sources can be traced back to Eichmann, it appears also unlikely they were fabricated to provide false evidence for the Holocaust.
What facts? Hearsay from a guy who apparently mimicked the "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" monkeys?
No, I don't think so.