Here is what Gabi Weber has on the Eichmann kidnapping, and remember, she is not a Revisionist.http://www.gabyweber.com/dwnld/artikel/ ... 20ENGL.pdf
I don’t remember if this is mentioned here, but Frau Weber had to take the German spook agency, the BND, to court to get the Eichmann files. When she did, large portions were blackened out, why?
My take on it: It is possible that Eichmann did work for the Israelis in some capacity. “The Holocaust” story did not really take hold after the war, something had to be done. So, Eichmann was put on trial and a short while later the Frankfurt show was performed. I have a copy of a “Foreign Service Dispatch”, here are some excerpts (I could maybe post all of it, but it is a lousy scan):
It is a "Foreign Service Dispatch", marked confidential, Security classification, dated February 7.1961.
"Subject: The Eichmann Trial and the Allegations Against State Secretary Dr. Globke. A conversation with Hessian Attorney General Fritz Bauer."(Declassified 2-7-05)
(Comment: Globke played an important role in the Weber discoveries)
"The following main points emerged in private conversations January 30 with Hessian Attorney General Fritz Bauer (SPD), who has been pushing allegations of complicity in Nazi war crimes against State Secretary Dr. GLOBKE, and who has recently visited Israel on several occasions in connection with the forthcoming trial of EICHMANN, in whose apprehension by Israeli Agents in Argentina last year he played a definite, though still obscure role, and with whom he talked in Israel in early January:
(Comment: Nothing about the Mossad, a handwritten note reads: "also see comment on last page. The comment reads: "The reporting officer suspects, though he can in no way document his supposition, that Bauer may well be connected in some high-ranking capacity with the Israeli Intelligence Service in West Germany)
"1) That Bauer and the SPD would continue to the maximum juridically feasible and politically
profitable point to push allegations of complicity in Nazi war crimes against Globke;
(Comment: What have politics to do with a criminal investigation?)
2) That the Israeli government was going slowly with the Eichmann trial in general, and would g particularly slowly with damaging allegations against prominent West Germans during the trial, for political and diplomatic reasons which Bauer himself accepts as fully valid;
(Comment: read this slowly)
3) That Eichmann had revelations to make which could be somewhat damaging to Globke, though it was doubtful that he would in fact make them.
(Comment: Why would he not voice those allegations, and what were they?)
4) That it was even more doubtful that Eichmann would make significant revelations against others in Bonn, though this was not known in Bonn, where uneasiness prevailed
(Comment: Same as above)"
It goes on to talk about Servatius and his role and then we read: "During the conversation Bauer also revealed that he had exact and undoubtable (this is what it says) information that as of December 1959, Martin BORMANN was still alive. He indicated that this information had come from Eichmann, but he would not elucidate further, nor reveal anything about Bormann's alleged location"
"In fact however, there was little reason for anyone in Bonn to lay awake nights, worrying about the Eichmann trial, as the press was speculating. No one in the Israeli government, least of all BEN GURION himself, Bauer went on, wanted to complicate or in any way exacerbate German-Israeli relations. These were, on the whole, viewed as developing favorably by the Israelis.'
(Comment: And here we must remember what Weber has dug up, that Ben Gurion would thread lightly and not expose any of the nuclear deal between Germany and Israel. Bauer would of course give no specifics, but if one reads between the lines. After all, why not make hay with Eichmann, tell the Germans what rotten mass murderers they are. But nothing, in fact the Frankfurt trial was needed to "convince" Germans of their "guilt")
"Bauer did not think that Israel would be in any sort of a hurry with the Eichmann trial, on the contrary; nor did he think the trial would be particularly sensational. He seems to feel all parties involved would "behave wisely" and that Ben Gurion's main aim would be to secure "historical light" for internal educational purposes within Israel ("Ben Gurion thinks the new generation in Israel is as unbelieving of Jewish passivity in the face of mass murder as the new generation in Germany is unbelieving of mass German guilt", Bauer said)"
(Comment: "All parties involved would "behave wisely"? Really? This would include Eichmann then. Ben Gurion's thoughts are also of note, why not prove that the Holo happened right there and then?)
"Bauer indicated that he was uncertain as to the true role being played in the case by Cologne attorney Robert Servatius, who has undertaken Eichmann's defense. Without saying so directly, Bauer hinted some feelings on his part that Servatius might be in the employ of the Bonn government, to keep the latter closely informed on the trial and to ensure the silence of Eichmann on a number of matters that might prove embarrassing to Bonn."
(Comment: Servatius did indeed thread lightly, still, what would those embarrassing matters be?)
"During the conversation, Bauer clammed up completely on questions regarding the method of
Eichmann's apprehension and his part in it (beyond admitting the latter), which he called "irrelevant historical questions"..."
(Comment: Oh really, "irrelevant"? Hmmm)”
I did this for someone, ignore my comments. Was Eichmann hanged? We don’t know.