Refutation on several topics needed

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:45 pm

Refutation on several topics needed

Postby dantesnake » 8 years 6 months ago (Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:38 am)

Hello, I had to open a new topic since this is in no way Majdanek related.

So this dude I'm arguing with at the moment pulled this out: ... -disposal/
And I must admit it kind of worries me. Maybe because I am not educated enough, so I ask if the following has been refuted by anyone:

-falsification of the death certificates
-low number of typhus victims
-multiple bodies cremation

but anything that has been refuted in this text I could use.

thanks in advance

Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:41 am

Re: Refutation on several topics needed

Postby stefanob » 8 years 6 months ago (Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:01 pm)

That article covers a VAST number of arguments. Refuse to deal with all at once, because exterminationists are at ease with confusion.
So choose one topic. Then find a good article about it on or (they have an effective 'search' function). You will surely find the answers, as this is old stuff.

Hey, I saw that article mentions Dr. Kremer... read this one:

Here you see not only that Kremer's confession and earlier diary are useless to prove the gassings at Auschwitz, but also that he testifies about the horror of the epidemics raging at Auschwitz in that summer of 1942.

You always have to stay on details and rely upon previous revisionist studies, or you will find yourself struggling to refute what has already being refuted.
I am not a native english speaker, so please forgive errors and weird syntax

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9950
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Refutation on several topics needed

Postby Hannover » 8 years 6 months ago (Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:45 pm)

Indeed, one topic / one point per thread is part of the guidelines at this forum. It helps prevent confusion, and, as stefanob has mentioned, attempts to confuse is a preferred tactic by fact-less Believers.

However, concerning your link: ... -disposal/
Zimmerman's "Body Disposal at Auschwitz" has been sliced and diced at this forum. In general, Zimmerman has been shown to be a classic shyster. A few examples:

'Cyanide Chemistry at Auschwitz'
A lengthy thread where Zimmerman and other Holocaust Industry biggies suffer a serious beat down.

and then:
Zimmerman's cremation deceptions exposed by Mattogno

still more:
'holocaust' Hist. Project's Zimmerman - more deception

'Holocaust' History Project's Zimmerman demolished'
Features Germar Rudolf's response to Zimmerman in the Los Angeles Times.

'anti-Revisionist Michael Shermer and his book debunked'
Shyster Zimmerman is covered in this demolition.

Do not miss The Rudolf Report:

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests