If this is not supposed to be a 'holocaust' mass grave then what is the point of your bringing the claimed mass grave into a 'holocaust' discussion forum?
As I said before there is no way to verify that:
1. this a real mass grave, certainly looks strange
2. that it is even at Serniki or anywhere else
So far I'm not buying any of your story.
We've only seen two suspicious photos, an email which confirms nothing, talk of a chapter in book which you cannot produce, instead of scientific forensic report, and alleged court transcripts which you cannot produce. Not a whole lot going on here.
If you have more photos, copyright laws states that for fair use
you can post them for educational discussion, that's the law.
You claim trial transcripts but cannot produce them, so what can I say. You either have them for us to review or you do not. And if ypu do not then what's the point of bringing them up. And if you cannot find them from the alleged source then one has to further question their veracity. IOW, what are they hiding? And logically it is fair to ask if what your saying about a 'transcript' is true at all? So far it's all empty talk.
If the site is mentioned in two books, then so what? Empty claims, rumors, or wishful thinking are often transmitted and repeated. That certainly cannot be construed as verification. It is not convincing proof. Try that method in a real court of law, i.e.: 'Your honor, the court must believe me because what I feel is true is mentioned in two books'. Good luck with that one. Aliens that supposedly look like amphibians are mentioned in countless books, doesn't mean they are real.
There are no double standards. The Journal of Historical Review citations are readily reviewable & verifiable, your claims are obviously not.
Peer review? Show us this peer review. That would be pretty amazing since you cannot even produce anything which even resembles an archeological evaluation and analysis the would be reviewed by so called 'peers', and you cannot even answer the points / questions I have raised.
On your fourth point, I saw no 'transcript' to review in this guy's cheesy little email.
What it really looks like to me is that your dodging. You come out with all guns blazing and are now being challenged and cannot deliver. And as a result we see nothing but excuses.
As an example of how to excavate a grave, he gives a detailed description of how it was done at Serniki and how the bodies were identified.
This I gotta see. Is he just talking about it / claiming it, or does he show it being done. Does he produce the methodology, data, in situ photos, etc.? IOW, a legit, verifiable scientific forensic report. We're waiting.
I suggest you read our basic & fair guidelines, dodging is distinctly discouraged.