The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 7 years 9 months ago (Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:36 pm)

There have already been many good revisionist videos--but, the following linked video may be the best yet:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nncqrIbuKhE[/youtube]

By using the "pause" feature, anyone can read the text as leisurely as they care to, and take notes about sources and references, or whatever.

Edited by Webmaster
Mr. Berg (and that’s goes for all others too), you can use this code when you want to link to Youtube like above:

Code: Select all

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nncqrIbuKhE[/youtube]

To do it, just highlight

Code: Select all

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nncqrIbuKhE

and click on "Youtube" button in the editor. Hope this helps.
Webmaster


Image
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings,com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
Last edited by Friedrich Paul Berg on Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Dresden » 7 years 9 months ago (Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:14 pm)

Wow!.....there sure is a lot of information in that video, Mr. Berg.
I wonder how long it will stay up on YouTube? :(
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:15 am)

Here are some additional links to more video material:

http://thethirdcraft.org/TC_Videos/defiance-nazigassings-production.wmv

http://thethirdcraft.org/TC_Videos/

http://zioncrimefactory.com/the-six-million-myth/


Image
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings,com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
Last edited by Friedrich Paul Berg on Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

User avatar
diaz52
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 272
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:07 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby diaz52 » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:52 am)

While I agree entirely that the future of revisionism has to be in videos if we are to win this fight, as the masses are not going to suddenly start reading books of a scholarly nature and turn this thing around. No, it has to be in videos. And look what an opportunity the web provides for doing so, with youtube and other video share sites on the web. Yes they're often censored but there's ways around that, such as you can post smaller videos on there that pique a viewers interest and are designed to not incur the censors' wrath, and then direct them to your own site for a fuller exposition of revisionist evidence. Anyways, there will always be censorship with regard to this discussion, well until we win that is. However revisonism has to get into the video production business and now, if we're to win. Denierbud's videos are an excellent example of this, they're really well produced and have a high production value, and they also wonderfully informative, very well presented and very viewable, and yes they can even be amusing and entertaining.

This video you've posted is a little different, in that it presents written articles and passages from books that the viewer can use the pause option to read. This is an interesting technique. Two things about this technique:

1. Do you remind the viewer that they can do this in the beginning of your video? Something like: "What follows are passages from books and articles. Use the pause function to read them fully." I didn't see that, maybe you did but I didn't see it. You might think this is stating the obvious, but the average viewer may not think of doing that IMHO, and so its worth pointing out.

2. This brings us to the 2nd point: some of the text you use at the bottom of the video are hard to read, as the video behind the text is white, and the text is white. This makes reading the text of what you have to say difficult. I know its a small and production oriented kind of thing, but this is the kind of thing that turns people off and makes them feel that the video is of low production value. And that the producer of this video doesn't know what they're doing. Consumers of today's videos and movies and television are used to a standard of viewing quality, which is high. The content may be total crap, and usually is, from both TV and Hollywood, but they're used to high production values. I'd suggest if possible a black background on the bottom part of the video, so your white colored text is easily readable. I know these things shouldn't matter, and that its your excellent content that matters, but this is what folks are used to, and you wouldn't want to lose receptivity to your message due to some production oriented thing like that.
-You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
-The establishment can't control the web, and the control of information through all means but one, is no control at all.

User avatar
diaz52
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 272
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:07 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby diaz52 » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:11 am)

Oh and here's another point about your video that would improve it, IMHO:

You should have a black screen with no video behind it just for a few moments with text that explains that the many passages from books and articles that you are going to cite are from BEFORE the Holocaust is said to have even begun. Stating that alone by itself will let the viewer know that the crucial point, which is the whole point of the video. That these many references to 6 million murdered and victimized Jews was in the media long before the holohoax even supposedly began. Thats the CRUCIAL message in your video. So before you present that evidence, let them know that in clear black and white, and let them read that clearly, with no video behind to distract them from that message. It'll make the many references you cite that much more powerful, and it will 'set it up' nicely. Anyways thats just my opinion for improving the video. Nicely done though, and thanks for letting us know about it.
-You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
-The establishment can't control the web, and the control of information through all means but one, is no control at all.

Mkk
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:00 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Mkk » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:24 pm)

Mr. Berg,

Good video, some of the text is hard to read though, for example the excerpt from Irving's Churchill biography.
"Truth is hate for those who hate the truth"- Auchwitz lies, p.13

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:21 pm)

Thank you for all of your constructive comments. In future new and revised videos, we will certainly try to incorporate ALL of your suggestions.

One point worth stressing is that we are living through a technological revolution. It seems likely that within a few years we will be able to watch revisionist videos on ordinary TV screens, for example-- perhaps during commercial breaks in regular TV programs. We must be part of these technological changes and use them to our full advantage. The disadvantages of conventional publishing will be more than overcome by the vastly greater audiences that we are likely to reach. We should all try to master the new emerging technologies and NOT simply wait for someone to do things for us. Even FACEBOOK is useful for "challenging" self-described "holocaust survivors" to debate.

One possible objection to the video which I am happy to have NOT seen yet is that it is: too pro-Hitler. As time passes, I think it will become ever more important to recognize that Hitler really was one of the greatest men who ever lived, probably the greatest--and, to whom we are all indebted for preventing the spread of communism throughout the entire world. We should remind ourselves that the US and Britain helped communism conquer much of the world. For all of its military prowess and bluster, the US and Britain totally failed to ever defeat communism militarily, anywhere.

Also, if we ever want to really deal with the economic and financial catastrophe facing us--there is no better person to study and emulate than Adolf Hitler. It was Hitler who achieved the greatest economic miracle in all of human history--and, he did it in the face pf a worldwide depression in a defeated country that was also boycotted and had NO natural resources except for coal That was a real miracle from which everyone should and must learn--but as we all know. the forces that still rule the world dare not admit that Hitler was anything but a genocidal madman. He certainly was none of that.

The price of holocaust propaganda to the future of the entire world is truly staggering.

Image
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings,com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
Last edited by Friedrich Paul Berg on Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

SKcz
Member
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:17 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby SKcz » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:58 pm)

I must say that I don´t agree with this.

I strongly suggest to not to call opponents with words "bullshit" "vampires" and with other similar words or show "hammers" as an instrument to stop them, no need to be rude, revisionists have arguments, no need to attack.

I strongly suggest to remove "This is good" (Nazi party and Germany flag with swastika) "This is evil" (David´s star) both from 8:33, despite the fact that i strongly disagree with this promoting, I suggest to remove it since ordinary peoples will dismiss this video immediately as neo-nazi propaganda.

I strongly suggest to remove nostalgic background music together with pictures and films about "golden days of Third Reich" since this really makes an impression that authors really miss Third Reich, so peoples will dimiss it again for being neo-nazi propaganda. To be honest, I have this feeling from almost whole video and don´t like it.

I really don´t know what these pictures or films have to do with revisionists arguments.

Mkk
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:00 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Mkk » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:19 pm)

or show "hammers" as an instrument to stop them, no need to be rude, revisionists have arguments, no need to attack.

Just an aside, but the hammer sign is a symbol from the Pink Floyd film the Wall, used at a neo-Nazi rally as a substitute for the swatstika. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGtKXMAgbVk The use wasn't meant to mean that.

Mr. Berg, there are several kinds of historical revisionism and as said above it would be better to soften the blow to the Holohoax believer by not throwing in pro-National Socialist elements. They will think Holocaust revisionism is all about NS when it is not. I would be interested to see videos from you on wider historical revisionism if you are so inclined. :)
"Truth is hate for those who hate the truth"- Auchwitz lies, p.13

SKcz
Member
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:17 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby SKcz » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:47 pm)

Mkk wrote:
or show "hammers" as an instrument to stop them, no need to be rude, revisionists have arguments, no need to attack.

Just an aside, but the hammer sign is a symbol from the Pink Floyd film the Wall, used at a neo-Nazi rally as a substitute for the swatstika. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGtKXMAgbVk The use wasn't meant to mean that.


I know these hammers. But I missed the news that they used this instead of Nazi swastika.

My point is still valid, present this "nazi" symbol to show that Nazis are the instrument which "can stop these vampires", this is absurd.

User avatar
Kingfisher
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Kingfisher » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:39 pm)

Agree with SKcz and Mkk. The first rule of communication is to avoid alienating the people you most want to influence. This video as it stands will do just that.

What happened in the events that have come to be known as the Holocaust is an issue of historical fact. Muddying the waters with your own political opinions which will be unpalatable to 100% of your target audience, even to a good percentage of revisionists, is sheer folly. It might make you feel good but it will convert no one and drive away many more.

It is true that once you have accepted that the Germans did not murder millions of people from mad racist motives you will then be more open to considering other factors: that Germany did not have sole responsibility for the war; that Allied actions were brutal and open to accusations of war crimes; that the Nazi regime, while strongly authoritarian, may well have been less brutal than the Soviet Union; that Jews bear some of the responsibility for starting the war and for promoting the extermination myth; etc. But don't put the cart before the horse. The first step is to persuade people to look objectively at the H and to consider that it might not be quite what they have always been told it is. Before you can persuade, you have to sow doubt.

I agree with the technical criticisms too. The camera wafts over pages of text at poor definition with no explanation. I know what it's about because I'm familiar with the texts and the arguments, but to the uninitiated it will be totally baffling. And why that music? Is that scholarly? To me personally it's annoying and distracting; the only way I can watch the video is with the sound off.

Denierbud's videos are scholarly. So is Eric Hunt's, although I have issues with his approach. This is most definitely not.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:16 am

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Friedrich Paul Berg » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:10 pm)

As to the critical comments about the video I introduced with this thread, my response is: make your own videos.

The person who made the video for this thread is driven by an intense creative passion. The video is NOT the combined work of some group of boring "academic" scholars. The complaints suggest that the people making them eally do not grasp what is involved or what is happening in the world today. They prefer some kind of namby-pamby revisionism that rejects major parts of the holocaust hoax while hanging on to the obscene notions that the Nazis were still "evil" somehow and that the US still was and/or is "good." They want a kind of Gold-i-locks revisionism:--not too hot, and not too cold. It is the US and Britain and Jews in general that were and still are "evil"--and that should be said as dramatically and loudly as possible. In the 1930's the US kept more than ten million people in de facto slavery while Jews in Nazi Germany were doing so well, financially and otherwise, that most had absolutely no desire to leave Nazi Germany--even as late as 1945, even when they could be "liberated" by the Soviets in Auschwitz. During the war itself and even since then, it was the USofA (the true terrorist nation) which committed the worst atrocities in all of human history. Slang words like "bullshit" help get the message and the righteous anger across to ordinary people.

The disasters facing the world today are so enormous that we need all the help we can get. Hitler's spectacular accomplishments still have everything to teach us.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

User avatar
fountainhead
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 8:46 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby fountainhead » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:20 pm)

Friedrich Paul Berg wrote:One possible objection to the video which I am happy to have NOT seen yet is that it is: too pro-Hitler

We hear you, in that once you accept that there was no extermination program, the old black and white vision of Nazis and Hitler as wholly evil fades away. It's not so much that we disagree, but combining this with holocaust revisionism will probably alienate a lot of people. Perhaps this tactic will drive the point home for some, but for what it's worth, in my own case and for most other people I've seen, the main initial response to revisionism is, "Ugh, these guys are just Neo-Nazi, white-supremacist skinheads" *close video*. That's something I think we'd like to avoid. But you're right - nothing stopping us from making our own videos. I think we need more videos like David Cole's, One Third of the Holocaust and even Mr. Berg's own lecture on CO and Zyklon B, as these were the ones that made me stop dismissing "deniers" as skinheads.
Who controls the past controls the future.
Who controls the present controls the past.

Carolyn Yeager
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Carolyn Yeager » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:58 pm)

Kingfisher wrote:It is true that once you have accepted that the Germans did not murder millions of people from mad racist motives you will then be more open to considering other factors: that the Nazi regime, while strongly authoritarian, may well have been less brutal than the Soviet Union;


Hi Kingfisher. I am so perplexed by this "may well have been." It really caught my attention. Definitely Nazi Germany was less brutal than the SU! Do you really feel they are sort of equal or are you just putting it that way out of consideration for the communists (heh heh), or the politically correct? I'm not picking on you at all, I'd really like to know. :| (Too bad there's not a smilie with a halo.)
In Jewish history there are no coincidences ... Elie Wiesel
Learn more at http://eliewieseltattoo.com

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-unde ... uided-tour

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Re: The Future of Revisionism: Scholarly VIDEOS

Postby Haldan » 7 years 9 months ago (Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:31 pm)

Carolyn:

There is such a smiley :angel7:

Faithfully,
-haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests