New Statesman has decided I am spam

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Carolyn Yeager
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:55 pm

New Statesman has decided I am spam

Postby Carolyn Yeager » 7 years 9 months ago (Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:19 pm)

I'm making this a separate entry so it will get sufficient attention.
Since I checked out Borjastick's comments at the New Statesman Muslim editorial, I went back to the Guy Walter's comment section - http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/guy-w ... st_comment - where I had been quite active for around a week, and answered Phil Boyd's slanderous and dishonest attack on Joerg Friedrich's THE FIRE, and on Friedrich's source: Peter's account on the Bremen bombing of May 18-19, 1940.

Phil Boyd tells the readers only about Peter's first book, but not that there was a second book. Here is the evidence: http://wiki-de.genealogy.net/Literatur_ ... he_Chronik

Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1921 - 1932
Bremen 1938

Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1933 - 1945
Bremen 1951

Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1945 - 1956
Bremen 1976

There are also other sources showing that Fritz Peters wrote 3 books, as an expert on Bremen history. If Phil Boyd looked up the book, he had to have seen that, but chose to say in his "rebuttal" there was only the first book. When I wrote this information and submitted it -- with exactly the same personal information I used many times before and was accepted -- I received a notice that "my comment was perceived as spam and was rejected." I tried two more times but got the same message.

So ... is the Britisher Phil Boyd a regular there who can pull some strings? I said "So long" to Phil in my last comment (a mistake), so did Phil hope he could get away with his lies without me to interfere with him? Did he make sure I couldn't? I don't know, but I know there are such influential "Jewish posters" at Amazon forums, which I have experienced first hand.

My suggestion: Someone from here - Borjastick? Astro 3? Kingfisher? - take my information about Peters' books and post it at the Guy Walter's comment section. Read the last two comments from Phil Boyd and you will know what to say. Thanks.
In Jewish history there are no coincidences ... Elie Wiesel
Learn more at http://eliewieseltattoo.com

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-unde ... uided-tour

User avatar
rerevisionist
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:01 am
Contact:

Re: New Statesman has decided I am spam

Postby rerevisionist » 7 years 9 months ago (Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:35 pm)

The New Statesman is just a Jewish mouthpiece. It is 'left wing' only in the sense that it will back Jewish policies which damage white countries - unwanted immigration, weak laws against criminals, dumbed-down education, promotion of abotion, promotion of porn, the Holocaust fraud - but will never speak out against Jewish-supported atrocities and crimes such as the USSR, Kissinger and Vietnam, the paper money fraud, etc. I'm quite surprised you're both so naive as not to know this. I'd guess the last time it had any integrity was about the time Keynes edited it.

Carolyn Yeager
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: New Statesman has decided I am spam

Postby Carolyn Yeager » 7 years 9 months ago (Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:39 pm)

rerevisionist wrote:The New Statesman is just a Jewish mouthpiece. It is 'left wing' only in the sense that it will back Jewish policies which damage white countries - unwanted immigration, weak laws against criminals, dumbed-down education, promotion of abotion, promotion of porn, the Holocaust fraud - but will never speak out against Jewish-supported atrocities and crimes such as the USSR, Kissinger and Vietnam, the paper money fraud, etc. I'm quite surprised you're both so naive as not to know this. I'd guess the last time it had any integrity was about the time Keynes edited it.


Okay, but who said anybody believed in the integrity of the New Statesman? But we had something going there. I'm just asking for someone to post the truth I have provided in defense of the integrity of Joerg Friedrich and his book The Fire. Not a difficult thing to do.
In Jewish history there are no coincidences ... Elie Wiesel
Learn more at http://eliewieseltattoo.com

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-unde ... uided-tour

EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: New Statesman has decided I am spam

Postby EtienneSC » 7 years 9 months ago (Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:43 pm)

Consider it done Carolyn. Not that it may not have been undone by the time you read this.

On the NS comments system, it might be worth noting that it refers to "sums", although the plus sign is sometimes at an angle that makes it look like multiplication. This is scarcely relevant to someone of your intelligence and insight, but other readers might find it instructive! Obviously, a Zionist plot to suppress free debate is much more likely than any deficiency in mental arithmetic on your part.

Carolyn Yeager
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: New Statesman has decided I am spam

Postby Carolyn Yeager » 7 years 9 months ago (Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:54 pm)

EtienneSC wrote:Consider it done Carolyn. Not that it may not have been undone by the time you read this.

On the NS comments system, it might be worth noting that it refers to "sums", although the plus sign is sometimes at an angle that makes it look like multiplication. This is scarcely relevant to someone of your intelligence and insight, but other readers might find it instructive! Obviously, a Zionist plot to suppress free debate is much more likely than any deficiency in mental arithmetic on your part.


It's still there. Thanks a lot. I just went and tried again with:

You are so right Stephen, and thank you. Here are the three books:
Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1921 - 1932
Bremen 1938

Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1933 - 1945
Bremen 1951

Peters, Fritz

Zwölf Jahre Bremen 1945 - 1956
Bremen 1976

They are listed at http://wiki-de.genealogy.net/Literatur_ ... he_Chronik

That puts Phil's accusations against Joerg Fredrich, author of The Fire, to rest once and for all.
__________________

But same results. I know how their system works and how to add and multiply. But probably Phil Boyd got them to ban me based on calling him "tricky Phil". That's what I think. I wish someone would list all the books as I have done here, and the link to the website so that it carries more weight with other readers. Phil should not get away with such blatant lies. Plus, he seems to be a regular at New Statesman.
In Jewish history there are no coincidences ... Elie Wiesel
Learn more at http://eliewieseltattoo.com

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-unde ... uided-tour


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests