Hans: “If you any specific questions, do not hesitate to ask”
Yes, I hesitate, because serious members of this forum rightfully do no longer answer “Hans” or “ask” him questions: as his postings show, he believes in the most impossible and weird “Holocaust”-Miracles ad absurdum
and ad infinitum
, he habitually does not answer important questions/problems, repeats refuted nonsense endlessly, gives worthless links and “evidence” (Olère, c.s.), dodging facts, etc.
But, for the sake of this “discussion”, the information of others and the “validity” of Hans’ postings, I have the following questions for him on “gas chambers”.
Let’s not, as is usual in this case, begin in the middle of the book, but at the beginning:1. On building of the “gas chambers”a.
Is it possible that the Germans made “chimneys for Zyklon-B” on the “gas chamber” in Winter (Jan/Febr, see photos), whereas Krema’s II and III were finished in March, and according to Pressac, Van Pelt, et al., they “rebuild” them as “gas chambers” after completion?b.
Can you explain why – during this “rebuild” – not one
of the necessary installations for mass-murder was installed or equipped (heating, circulation, etc.)?c.
Can Hans explain why those “chimneys” are placed more or less congruent on the roof at Krema II, and very incongruent on Krema III?
Is this because they were falsely drawn in
on these photographs?d.
Can he explain the totally irregular placing of the so-called “holes” in the remains of the roof of Krema II, otherwise than that those visible (3) “holes” are roughly made afterwards and/or normal debris of an explosion?e.
Was Walter Schreiber voluntarily a perjurer in his 90th year on his deathbed?2. On “gas chambers”a.
Is it correct that Van Pelt, Pressac, etc. stated that the 4 Birkenau Krema’s were not designed for “mass gassings”?b.
If this is correct, then it follows that all later “explanations” about some “mass murder capacity” of those Krema’s are pure and simple totally BS?c.
Is it correct that Van Pelt, in his Auschwitz, 1270 until Now
, stated: "Crematoria IV and V were the first buildings especially build for mass-murder, designed with gas chambers, a corpse house and an incineration room, in a logical sequence”
If yes, why does these “especially built ‘gas chambers’ for mass-murder”
didn’t have any form of ventilation? Why not the slightest kind of circulation? Why no Zyklon-B chimneys? Why was there absolutely no undressing space? Why 2 doors plus 5 windows in those “gas chambers”, etc., etc.e.
If Van Pelt is not totally insane, German architects and engineers were?f.
Why do you call clumsy Holocaust cartoonist
David Olère a “witness”?g.
Is there one (1) autopsy report
, of only one
of 4 million gassed victims? (Hundreds of autopsies were performed after the liberation of the camps.)h.
If not, is there one (1)
name of a person (with proof), who died from “gassing”?i.
Why are only Jews
“witnesses” about “gassings”? The Red Cross stated that not one of the survivors of the camps spoke to her about “gassings”).3. On Logisticsa.
Is it correct that according to Holocaust “historians” after Spring 1944 daily 12-20.000 Jews
arrived at Auschwitz (let’s be modest and say 15.000/day)?b.
Can Hans explain why ALL known photo’s of the “selection process" at the ramp in Auschwitz, show us two
rows of people: 1 for men only, and one for women and children only?c.
Can he tell us which
of these rows was destined for “gassing”, as the Holocaust propaganda told us?d.
If it was the row with women and children, how is that possible, because the row with men are 6 times longer
than the row with women and children. The Jewish Holocaust Version tells us opposite:
that the number of “gassed” Jews was 6 times higher than the number chosen for labour! Can Hans explain this?e.
Is it thus an outright LIE
to speak of “selections for the gas chamber on the ramp”, because this was a simple preparation for separate bathing/delousing and separate housing in baracks?f.
From where came all working Jewesses in Birkenau, if they all were “selected” (all in one row) on the ramp for “immediate gassing”?g.
Is it correct that almost all of the people (let’s say 80%) went “straight to the gas chamber”?h.
Makes that an average of 12.000 gassings per day
Does that mean, with a total of 46 muffles for Auschwitz, that the daily pro ratio
share for Krema II alone was 15/46 x 12.000 = nearly 4.000 corpses to be gassed/cremated each day
Is it also correct that there was only one rout to get “gassed” bodies (let’s say 2.000 after each “gassing”) to the above oven room? k.
Is it correct that the only rout was using one (1) very small open elevator (2,4 m2) with maximum load and size for approximately 8 bodies?l.
If so, is it a fact that there was, apart from the “gas chamber” and “undressing room”, no space
to store those just “gassed” 2.000 bodies?m.
Is it correct, that the little elevator after only the first daily ‘gassing”, had to go 2.000/8 = 250 times up and down?n.
Is it reasonable to suppose that 1 elevator cycle, loading eight corpses, transporting it to the first floor, unloading the corpses and descending, takes plm. 6 minutes, so transporting half
of a daily gassing-quota takes 1500 min = 25 hours
What about the other 2.000 "gassed" that day???? That would require another 25 hours elevator time!p.
As there was absolutely no room
to store 2.000 bodies during 6 days (cremation time) outside the “gas chamber”, where were all those bodies to stored? .. as there was no place anywhere on the cellar floor (see ground plan Krema’s II, III)?q.
Is this picture of absolute chaos and nonsense,
what Holocaust propaganda calls: “Systematic destruction of the Jews”
Is there any
(1) serious study from “Holocaust scholars” dealing with the logistics of this so-called “systematic mass-gassings”, the backbone
of the whole “gassing” story?To continue logistics with the cremation process:
Is it correct that 1 muffle can cremate 1 body in 1 hour time? (The British Cremation Society says 45 kg/hr max with nowadays installations.). (Please not the nonsense
again of 3-8 bodies per muffle because that's as well impossible as irrelevant.)b.
If yes, it means that to cremate the daily quantity for Krema II (4.000 persons) average weight 45 kg, 4.000 cremation hours are needed. But, with 15 muffles and (lets be kind to the exterminationists) 20 operational hours per day (Van Pelt says 12), only maximum 300 cremations per day were possible.But . . ., but, Hans, what to do? From day one, 3.700 “gassed” could not be cremated, and . . ., and . . . the following day, there were another 4.000 to be “gassed”, and, Oy Vey, the next day another 4.000, and the day thereafter another . . ., and another . . . Can you give (with proof) a solution for this cumulative problem?c.
So, the logistics of only 1 Krema brings after 1 week
the following situation:
7 x 4.000 = 28.000 people “gassed”;
2.100 bodies cremated
= 25.900 bodies not cremated.
Were those 25.900 bodies (together with 50.000 of the Krema’s III, IV, and V) incinerated in “pits”?d.
If yes, are there any “witnesses”
who have seen daily transports of thousands of bodies?e.
Is there a “drawing”
by David Olère of one of those daily > 10.000 bodies transported from the “Gas chambers” (Krema’s) through the Camp, to those miraculous “pits”?f.
Are there any other witness from those enormous daily transports?g.
If not, where did those tens of thousands bodies go?h.
Are there any aerial photographs of those daily mass-transports and incinerations?i.
If not, why not?j.
Was it not much better for the Germans to shut down those clumsy Krema’s, if altogether 92,5% of the “gassed” bodies were to be incinerated in “pits”? k.
And, can you (or any other believer) explain how to deal with the growing and growing numbers of thousands and thousands people waiting for days/weeks to be "gassed" and cremated, for there was absolutely no place for them and/or their dead bodies in or around the Krema’s
Was this only one of countless “Holocaust Miracles”
, or is it only the Jewish Holocaust Version Myth?