name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
avatar
Atigun
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 470
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:13 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Atigun » 4 years 2 months ago (Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:55 pm)

Moderator wrote:Atigun:
Your reply to Hannover in this thread Cyanide Chemistry at Auschwitz was certainly off topic and offensive on a personal level. It had nothing to do with your lighthearted response which is in fact available to read above, BTW. When we see such behavior caution is exercised in order to prevent spam. You are welcomed here like everyone who abides by our basic guidelines. You can now post again without a spam check. Again no 'holocaust' related topic has been banned or censored at this forum.

you said:
To err is human. To err as a moderator on a website is not only unforgivable but will haunt you for the rest of your life. You must now bear the mark of the scarlet letter.
Indeed, this job is not for everyone. I'm sure I'll rot in Jewish hell, or be assassinated by a JDL type.
Cheers, M1


In my initial post on the "Cyanide at..." post I stated that my post was off topic. IOW, I was aware that my post was off-topic and would have no objection to a moderator deleting it or limiting the replies to my off topic post. I was simply seeking some technical expertise on a different but related topic of characteristics of Zyklon-B and cyanide. Hannover's reply was completely unrelated to my question. I meant no insult (note the LOL) in my response, only that it was wide of the mark. I simply pointed out that your answer had no relation to the outgassing characteristics of Zyklon-B.



User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 4 years 2 months ago (Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:00 pm)

Atigun wrote:In my initial post on the "Cyanide at..." post I stated that my post was off topic. IOW, I was aware that my post was off-topic and would have no objection to a moderator deleting it or limiting the replies to my off topic post. I was simply seeking some technical expertise on a different but related topic of characteristics of Zyklon-B and cyanide. Hannover's reply was completely unrelated to my question. I meant no insult (note the LOL) in my response, only that it was wide of the mark. I simply pointed out that your answer had no relation to the outgassing characteristics of Zyklon-B.
You said in that thread:
I had asked what had been done with the leftover Zyklon-B when it was removed from the Kula columns in the Auschwitz gas chambers. I was told that, due to it's distance to other buildings it was simply dumped at the "southern end" of the gas chambers and the cyanide simply dispersed.
And Hannover stated:
Ask them to give proof that cyanide gas is ineffective at 20 meters. The supposed withdrawn Zyklon-B would be emitting it's cyanide load for hours in the wind. And Zyklon-B insecticide was used in large buildings much larger that 20 meters.
Remember, the alleged batch-after-batch of waiting Jews were outside right next to the alleged 'gas chambers' door.

Hanover also replied with an admittedly long response, excerpt:
That is a typically desperate reply. "Simply dispersed" means it would have have gassed anyone in a broad area, the distance to other buildings was not far at all, AND supposedly there was a 'next batch' of Jews waiting just outside.
He also said:
The Zyklon-B pesticide granules took/take hours to complete the outgassing of their cyanide load. The storyline says that this same SS man on the roof, supposedly wearing a highly visible gas mask, withdrew the container up from the 'gas chambers' in just minutes, again he would have been highly visible by the alleged next batch of Jews.

Remember, the Zyklon-B pesticide granules were allegedly dumped lowered into the 'gas chambers' and then removed. And since we know that the Zyklon-B pesticide would have taken hours to finish releasing it's cyanide load, we would then have had a situation where anyone in the entire area would have been vulnerable to gassing.
Looks like he answered your question spot on. There was no "leftover Zyklon-B" as he says there were no gassings.
Still no 'holocaust' related topics have been censored.
If you wish to continue then PM me. Clearly this issue is not a case of a 'holocaust' topic being censored.
Cheers, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9489
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Hannover » 3 years 7 months ago (Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:13 pm)

The desperate claims of 'censorship' usually come from those that have been demolished in debate at this forum. Andrew Mathis is a perfect example.
If those types had been 'censored' their arguments would not be here for everyone to read, yet anyone can read their arguments at this forum.

Here are examples, Mathis's failures first:

'holocaust' denial article by Andrew Mathis debunked here

Prof. Mc Nally dissects HHP's Andrew Mathis' bogus article

Holo. Hist. Proj.'s Andrew Mathis on Zyklon scent removal

Green, Mathis refuted / cyanide: lice, humans, & more

Believer org. spokesman, Andrew Mathis, demolished in debate

Holo. Hist. Proj.'s Andrew Mathis attempts damage control

Email from Andrew Mathis (The Holocaust History Project)

Andy Mathis / 'holocaust Hist. Project' Treblinka section

See Sergey Romanov, implode here:

Human soap & Human skin lampshades debunked

An example of Sergey Romanov's scholarship

Sergey Romanov - problems with Filip Mueller and Rudolf Vrba

for Roberto Muehlenkamp, aka 'Cortavagatas' see:

R.Muehlenkamp: 'gas chambers' were hosed down, so no cyanide

Those Prussian Blues Just Won't Wash

Roberto Muehlenkamp: no fuel required for Auschwitz ovens

Roberto Muehlenkamp shredded on 'gassings' & cyanide

Roberto Muehlenkamp debunked on 3.5kg of coke cremations

Cremation patent & 3.5 kg of coke per corpse debunked

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The Internet is demolishing the false narrative promoted by arrogant Jewish supremacists. From the slaughter of the Palestinians to the lies of Auschwitz the world is recognizing the dangers of Jewish supremacism.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Werd » 3 years 7 months ago (Thu Jan 01, 2015 4:09 pm)

Hannover wrote:The desperate claims of 'censorship' usually come from those that have been demolished in debate at this forum. Andrew Mathis is a perfect example.

Another example would be how this topic disappeared after I I annihilated Berker's responses loaded with dodges and strawmen. Thank you webarchive cache.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 3 years 7 months ago (Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:10 pm)

Incorrect, Werd. That topic is covered elsewhere at this forum. Use our search function for Berg Leuchter and see the current 86 results or search cyanide explosion and see the current 43 results.
Whether you 'annihilated' anyone there is beside the point and in checking the discussion I would say that perhaps you are overstating your position. It looks like you did some dodging and strawmaning yourself. Perhaps it's in your best interests to leave a sleeping dog alone, Google's webcache can cut both ways. :) Nonetheless, that topic is and was not censored, period.
Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Werd » 3 years 7 months ago (Thu Jan 01, 2015 10:30 pm)

Nonetheless, that topic is and was not censored, period.

I might belive that if it weren't for the fact that another topic from 2007 also disappeared.
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4676
It was called NON-explosive Range of Cyanide Gas Concentrations.

Somebody was clearly combing the codoh archives to get rid of any evidence that would show up Faurisson and Leuchter. Shameful. Bet you didn't think I had that one saved in my own personal library, did ya?

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 3 years 7 months ago (Fri Jan 02, 2015 6:56 am)

Werd,
Your point has no merit. Deleting one or two of Berg's obsessive, repetitive, name calling threads is warranted because, well, they are obsessive, repetitive, & name calling, often to an extreme. The subject cyanide explosion has obviously been covered at this forum, what about 86 & 43 results is difficult to understand? And we're certainly not going to discuss it in this thread.
Also, there's plenty of posts here where Berg rants about Leuchter & Faurisson, nobody is protecting them, you're simply ignoring those posts.

See one excellent example here of a thread started by Berg: The SANITY Test! where there's discussion on your non-explosive cyanide assertion AND Faurisson & Leuchter. This thread goes on for 13 pages consisting of 182 posts!

I do not care what you saved, it's certainly no secret or a big deal that participants save posts. In your case it has only revealed the very elements about yourself that you allege of someone else.

Anyway, if you don't accept my response then too bad, that's on you, not me.
I can only suggest that you commiserate with Berg. We're done with this.

Once again, no topic has been censored.
M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Werd » 3 years 5 months ago (Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:03 pm)

no topic has been censored.

Are you accusing me of lying when I say that codoh deleted a 2007 topic called NON-explosive Range of Cyanide Gas Concentrations? Or what about the 2014 one called A Response to the Leuchter and Berg "debate"? Am I lying when I say that one was deleted?

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3138
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Hektor » 3 years 5 months ago (Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:09 pm)

Deleting insulting or threatening posts are not censorship, if the subject has been discussed elsewhere. I think we debate non-explosive HCN concentrations elsewhere several times.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 3 years 5 months ago (Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:03 pm)

Werd:
Let's just say you are obviously not aware of the massive coverage given to that topic. I repeat:
Werd,
Your point has no merit. Deleting one or two of Berg's obsessive, repetitive, name calling threads is warranted because, well, they are obsessive, repetitive, & name calling, often to an extreme. The subject cyanide explosion has obviously been covered at this forum, what about 86 & 43 results is difficult to understand? And we're certainly not going to discuss it in this thread.
Also, there's plenty of posts here where Berg rants about Leuchter & Faurisson, nobody is protecting them, you're simply ignoring those posts.

See one excellent example here of a thread started by Berg: The SANITY Test! where there's discussion on your non-explosive cyanide assertion AND Faurisson & Leuchter. This thread goes on for 13 pages consisting of 182 posts!

I do not care what you saved, it's certainly no secret or a big deal that participants save posts. In your case it has only revealed the very elements about yourself that you allege of someone else.

Anyway, if you don't accept my response then too bad, that's on you, not me.
I can only suggest that you commiserate with Berg. We're done with this.

Once again, no topic has been censored.
M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 2 years 3 months ago (Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:48 pm)

bump
M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

Postby Moderator » 6 months 1 day ago (Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:19 pm)

Heat check.
M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests