Andrew Mathis demolished yet again / his Eichmann challenge

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9969
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Andrew Mathis demolished yet again / his Eichmann challenge

Postby Hannover » 6 years 6 months ago (Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:22 pm)

The irrational, illogical promoter of the impossible 'holocaust', shyster Andrew Mathis challenged a Revisionist in a readers response section within The Huffington Post:
Please indicate a statement made by Eichmann that was untrue, and demonstrate your evidence for the falseness of the same statement.
Now, one would think that after being made an absolute fool of at this forum, as demonstrated in this link,
see:
'Irrational Andy Mathis demolished at this forum'
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8027

Loudmouth little men like Andy Mathis would step back and take pause. But there are reasons why fools are called fools. Mathis is also known for harassing many Revisionists with threats of violence & other types of threats, and making phone calls to them, to make many long stories short. I think stalking is an appropriate description of his activities. There's lots more of that to tell for later consumption.

Nonetheless, taking his Eichmann challenge has got to be one the easiest tasks around. Here we go, demolishing once again the irrational loudmouth spokesman for the discredited 'holocaust' Industry, Andy Mathis, aka: 'Handy Andy'.

- So called 'holocaust' historian (the ultimate oxymoron) Browning had little recourse in stating:
Clearly, anyone who wants to dismiss Eichmann’s testimonies on the grounds of their demonstrated unreliability and shameless self-serving lies can easily do so, and many of my colleagues have done precisely this.

- from: Eichmann Interrogated, transcripts from the Archives of the Israeli Police, edited by Jochen von Lang in collaboration with Claus Sibyll. Translated from the German by Ralph Manheim. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, 1983, 293pp:
Eichmann claims to have witnessed mass slaughter on a grand scale at Auschwitz in the fall of 1941, where the camp commandant, Rudolf Hoess, informed him that the great, factory-like buildings, the chimneys of which belch smoke, are "working to capacity: Ten thousand!"
This is months before the Auschwitz crematoria were constructed, let alone in use.

Eichmann talks of Treblinka - but then he's not sure if it's Treblinka - where he says gassings were being carried out with a submarine engine (diesel); he claims at places near Minsk and Lemberg, mass shootings were taking place, including one mass grave from which he said
blood was gushing out ... like a geyser
although it had already been filled in; and again Treblinka (this time there's no doubt: phony railway station and all) where gassings, he claims, are being carried out with the insecticide Zyklon-B.
The gushering geysers are a nice touch, and work well with the propensity of other "Holocaust" mass graves to quake and spew forth blood, sometimes for months after the killings. Treblinka, however, is supposed not to have been functioning as an extermination center until the summer of 1942, nor was Zyklon-B ever claimed to have been employed there.

Eichmann even offers substantiation for the six-million claim-he says he's worked out the numbers from reading ***Jewish almanacs***, he persistently rejects the accusation that he was the organizer of the "Final Solution" or the "flywheel of the extermination machine."

- The 'holocaust' Industry's own Mark Roseman said:
Both Rudolf Hoess's and Eichmann's testimonies lack credibility.

- On Eichmann's Diaries, Charles M. Sennott, Boston Globe, March 1, 2000, included this little tid-bit of information:

From this self-absorbed focus on his own death he shifted easily to explaining in graphic detail how, in the death camps, "round cotton wool filters were soaked with this poison and thrown into the rooms where the Jews were assembled. The poison was instantly fatal."

The standard story line says the pesticide Zyklon-B was used. Zyklon-B was a dry granular substance impregnated with cyanide and outgasses for hours & hours, and in reality was used to kill typhus bearing lice.
In a German language version Eichmann is claimed to have said:
Hoess, the Kommandant, told me that he used **sulphuric acid** to kill. Round cotton wool filters were soaked with this poison and thrown into the rooms where the Jews were assembled. The poison was instantly fatal.

But in another version we read that Eichmann said:
The commandant, Hoess, told me that he used **prussic acid** to kill. Round wood-fibre discs were impregnated with this poison, and then thrown into the spaces where the Jews were gathered. The poison killed immediately.

The problem is, everyone from the sanitation officers on up claim that the insecticide, Zyklon-B, was a gypsum composite. And of course, survivors all insist it was "crystals" of various hues; blue, green, mauve, take your pick.

So in other words, Eichmann's testimony here goes against the other 'testimonies' about Zyklon-B at Auschwitz, which themselves contain vast contradictions. It sure is hard for them to keep the lies straight.

In his alleged pre-arrest 'memoirs', well...these 'memoirs' also have him describing himself as being more of a Zionist than an SS officer, right...sure.
Eichmann clearly copy-catted now debunked material given him:
- He refers to reading the 'holocaust' Industry's Reitlinger for 'information'.
- He had a heavily annotated copy of the discreditied Hoess memoirs, published in Germany in 1957.
- His preposterous statements that diesel submarine motors were used in gas chambers and that the hair of the victims was used to make slippers are from the bogus Gerstein claims. Gerstein's affidavit became very widely known right after the war. Gerstein made many different & absurdly conflicting 'confessions' as has been demonstrated by Frenchman Henri Rocques.
- Eichmann claims being ordered to go to Lemberg:
There had been a pit there, it was already filled in, and blood was gushing out of it...how shall I say?...like a geyser. I've never seen anything like it. I'd had enough of that mission.

Which he got from laughable testimony at the Einsatzgruppen Show Trials of 1947, not original to him.

We must also ask how the accusers can conduct a trial of the accused? It is necessarily a bogus, unfair trial.
And then we're back to the fact that there is no physical evidence, no documentary evidence, and the 'extermination' methods as alleged are scientifically impossible.

There's more:
EICHMANN INTERROGATED: Transcripts from the Archives of the Israeli Police edited by Jochen von Lang in collaboration with Claus Sibyll. Translated from the German by Ralph Manheim. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, 1983, 293pp.
Reviewed by Ted O'Keefe
http://vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/6/2/OKeefe237-240.html

Loudmouth, Handy Andy Mathis, utterly demolished yet again. This is too easy.

The tide is turning.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9969
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Andrew Mathis demolished yet again / his Eichmann challenge

Postby Hannover » 2 years 7 months ago (Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:43 pm)

It's revealing that the criminal & alleged 'professor' Andrew Mathis has embarrassed himself and is now so afraid of getting whacked around here for the laughable 'holocaust' storyline, an impossible storyline, that he still attempts to market to the gullible at other, less rigorous sites.

Another CODOH victory against criminal Zionist extremists.

Search him here for other examples of his 'holocau$t' lies biting the dust.

- Hannover

One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."

- endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9969
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Andrew Mathis demolished yet again / his Eichmann challenge

Postby Hannover » 2 years 4 months ago (Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:22 pm)

Belief in impossible Eichmann claims requires massive, visible, human. remains.
Recall that the storyline says that '6M Jews & 5M others' were murdered and their remains buried in allegedly known sites.
11,000,000 !!!

There are no excavations with massive human remains as alleged that can be shown. None.

Andrew Mathis also supports the thoroughly demolished Roberto Muehlenkamp, for a quick example see:

'Holocaust Industry's Roberto Muehlenkamp says "eyewitness" Bendel is proof of 'holocaust' '
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11297

Andrew Mathis & the "Holocau$t Industry" in court:

'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court. You must trust us, we're Zionists. :lol:

More on Andrew Mathis and his beloved Roberto Muehlenkamp:

The Industry's Roberto Muehlenkamp posts more fake 'holocaust' photos / Babi Yar
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11315
and:
The Industry's Roberto Muehlenkamp's 'corpse hauling Treblinka excavator' / Seriously?
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11262
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp and 'The Industry' say millions of Jew bones were ground up in 'bone mill'
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11263
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp & 'Holocaust' Industry cite incinerator patent application as proof of impossible cremation numbers
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11266
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp challenged on his claim of 'crime site investigations' for Belzec & Treblinka
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11277
and:
Industry's Roberto Muehlenkamp cites debunked liar Henryk Tauber as proof of Auschwitz 'gas chambers' !!
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11279
and:
spokesman Roberto Muehlenkamp says "confessions" of Kurt Gerstein proves 'holocaust' / seriously?
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11282
and:
Holocaust Industry's Roberto Muehlenkamp says "eyewitness" Bendel is proof of 'holocaust'
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11297
and:
'Holocaust Industy's' Roberto Muehlenkamp cites Yankel Wiernik as proof of extermination of 900,000 Jews at Treblinka !!
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11271
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp debunked on Sobibor again, this time by Thomas Kues.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11284
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp & his Holocaust Industry say "eyewitness" Bennahmias is proof of 'holocaust' / Yes they do.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11308
and:
Carlo Mattogno demolishes Roberto 'sardine pack' Muehlenkamp & those like him.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11322
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp claims 'Heinrich May Report on Chelmno' / So let's see it.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11324
and:
Roberto Muehlenkamp & the Indu$try's bizarre photo claim of alleged massive Chelmno human remains
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11333
and:
"Holocaust Industry's" Roberto Muehlenkamp sees thousands of dead Jews where there are none at Semeliškes[/b] :lol:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11344
and:
Industry's Andrew Mathis & Roberto Muehlenkamp claim patch of dirt holds remains of 100,000 at Ponar, Lithuania[/b] :lol:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11345
and:
note to Roberto on claimed 'Hydrokop' report
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11230
and:
Paid 'holocaust' Enforcer & Promoter Roberto Muehlenkamp believes liar Filip Mueller proves the 'holocau$t'
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11350

- Hannover
We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests