Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Again!

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Again!

Postby Haldan » 4 years 9 months ago (Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:01 am)

It has finally arrived — The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”, a 1400+ tome which makes proverbial mincemeat out of the Holocaust Controversies' folks, specificially their e-book titled “Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard”. One of these HC-bloggers receives the hardest punches and his name is Roberto Muehlenkamp, a guy who didn't fare so well at this forum either:
http://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=Muehlenkamp

Comments invited :read2:

-haldan

[ shorter, intro. version here:
http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/28-tecoar-intro.pdf
full length version here:
http://codoh.com/sites/default/files/do ... r-long.pdf
&
http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/28-tecoar-long.pdf
M1]
Here's from the CODOH main page:
In late 2011, several members of the exterminationist Holocaust Controversies blog published a 570 page-long online study titled Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. With it they claim to refute three revisionist monographs on these three alleged extermination camps.
This lengthy orthodox critique has forced the criticized revisionist authors to get back to the drawing board. Finally, after 20 months of arduous work by both the authors and the peer reviewers and editors involved, the results has finally been released to the public as a 1554 pages long PDF file!

This work has occupied the most knowledgeable revisionists for a year and more. It has led to the postponement of numerous other projects, including a number of other books of the Holocaust Handbooks series slated for publication. Today's leading revisionists consider this their ultimate response and final word on the subject. (And we all should hope so, because what would be next: a study comprising 5,000 pages?)

This definitive revisionist work on the alleged extermination camps of the so-called "Aktion Reinhardt" reveals in hundreds of cases that the Holocaust Controversies bloggers have plagiarized many sources and that many, if not most of their factual claims are mere conjectures, distortions, falsifications, hypocrisies, lies, misrepresentations, unfounded speculations, and blatant omissions of facts.

You can read more about this book here at CODOH – AND you can download this gargantuan work there as well – for free, of course, as usual.


<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:04 pm)

Already read the first two chapters. It's amazing. There is a really good section near the end of chapter two (89-91) where Mattogno says the nature of the holocaust controversies copy and paste manifesto necessitated that Mattogno, Graf and Kues all basically start from the ground up again. In other words, this monumental work is going to be better than their previous individual studies on each aktion reinhard camp.

I also am interested in understanding this quote.

http://codoh.com/library/document/3052
It goes without saying that it is neither easy nor profitable to publish such a huge two-volume opus which will find only a very small audience. In order to make the text a little more readable and to reduce the volume of the printed version slightly, the printed version usually does include only the English translations of foreign language sources quoted. The full foreign language text can be found in the extended PDF version, which can be downloaded here (37.7 MB). Since this PDF file is accessible to everyone and can thus be searched, we have refrained from creating a cost-prohibitive index. (A smaller file containing just the Table of Contents and Jürgen Graf's Introduction can be had here (318 KB).

Instead of summarizing the conclusions of this rebuttal, reference is made to a table in the appendix of the book's PDF version. It contains a list compiled by Carlo Mattogno with all the sources the Holocaust Controversies bloggers have plagiarized as well as their statements of bad faith, their mere conjectures, distortions, falsifications, hypocrisies, lies, misrepresentations, unfounded speculations, and blatant omissions of facts. The fact that this list spans more than 26 pages says it all...
_____________________________________

Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 28: Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues, Jürgen Graf: The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”: An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers, PDF edition, 2 parts, 1554 pp., 6"×9", 144 illustrations, bibliography (published in 10/2013); ISBN13: 9781591480358.

Usually when I see an isbn number I think, "Oh a hard copy of a book. Either hard or soft cover." But I guess long pdf books like this need an isbn number as well. It is in fact a book in the series of holocaust handbooks. This is apparently number 28 but in terms of hard copies of titles, there is not a book out that gets past 24. Yet this is 28. So will this stay digital like some others have apparently? Or should I expect this to become a hard copy in a year or two once more editing is done? It did say in the introduction that this was a bit of a rush publication and so any errors in grammar or spelling resulting from a translation are an honest accident. And there is apparently a distinction between a printed version and a PDF version.

" In order to make the text a little more readable and to reduce the volume of the printed version slightly, the printed version usually does include only the English translations of foreign language sources quoted. The full foreign language text can be found in the extended PDF version"

User avatar
Inquisitor
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:40 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Inquisitor » 4 years 9 months ago (Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:11 am)

Do we know if an actual book/hard-copy of this work is to be published in the Holocaust-Handbook series(or elsewhere)?

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Haldan » 4 years 9 months ago (Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:19 am)

Werd and Inquisitor:

My understanding is that this book is to be available as a hard copy, although there's still the preflighting to be done and also cover design.. :angel:

See HH for further updates. The current date for scheduled hard copy is set at 10/2013.

Regards,
-haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan

avatar
EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby EtienneSC » 4 years 9 months ago (Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:38 am)

The important section on the resettlement thesis is on pages 645-802. There is an interesting relevant summary on pages 84-86 on destruction of evidence, which also has interesting statements about documents relating to the Einsatzgruppen about which they intend to write next. This implies that there is documentary evidence of killings by these groups.

It's a shame they didn't insert section breaks and restart the footnotes numbering at each chapter - hopefully they can sort that out for the print version. On another point, I prefer having the text in the different languages. It brings you closer to the events.
Last edited by EtienneSC on Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2228
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby borjastick » 4 years 9 months ago (Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:33 am)

You don't need an ISBN number if it isn't being printed. I have written three books for Kindle/e-reader only and they do not have ISBN numbers but an Amazon system number only.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:38 pm)

I just read a little more tonight and in the third chapter, Mattogno simply slaughters Nicholas Terry and exposes him for his underhanded scholarship. So much so that Terry basically commits plagraism by having quotes with a footnote to a source that he never found or read himself but TOOK FROM ANOTHER PERSON'S BIBLIOGRAPHY without crediting that OTHER PERSON.* Hmmmm. Where have I seen this before? Oh yeah, Joan Peters in her book FROM TIME IMMEMORIAL wrote about Palestine being allegedly empty and years later, a young undergraduate named Norman Finkelstein debunked her book while a undergrad student. That would serve him well because someone gave him an uncorrected proofs copy of Alan Dershowitz's THE CASE FOR ISRAEL and he found that Dershowitz borrowed from Peters in the same fashion. Have a quote with a footnote exactly like Peters. Finkelstein pointed out Dershowitz got so involved with doing it that he exposed himself by having elipses in the same places that Peters had them when she was quoting things in her book. NICK TERRY ALSO DID THE SAME STUPID ELIPSES THING AND MATTOGNO BUSTED HIM. And that's just the small potato in chapter 3.

I can't stop reading this pdf. It is amazing.



* Hilariously he seems to have done with with a couple Mattogno books at least twice. He tried to use Mattogno's sources against him basically, but he utterly failed.

avatar
Mkk
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:00 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Mkk » 4 years 9 months ago (Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:10 am)

HC is apparently already planning a rebuttal:

We will reserve our full response to the maniacal work until we have had time to read through the verbiage and recover from both our laughter at its fallacies and our migraines from its tedious length. However, a few preliminary remarks are necessary here in order to forewarn our readers of the crap they will encounter when reading MGK's work.

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... -here.html

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... -best.html
"Truth is hate for those who hate the truth"- Auchwitz lies, p.13

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9459
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Hannover » 4 years 9 months ago (Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:57 am)

Mkk:
As usual, there is nothing specific in their 2 responses. A lot of 'they're antisemites' and their all so typical potty, poo-poo language and that's it. But wait, they do defend Gerstein's laughable nonsense* without actually discussing his "confessions" of course.

antisemite:
any person or thought that a Jew doesn't like

This really is too easy.

- Hannover

* Gerstein gave six different, very conflicting, and simply laughable "confessions'. Search Gerstein confessions at this forum.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:01 pm)

I especially enjoyed the "Lilliputians" straw-man on page 15 (perhaps inspired by your colleague "Thomas Dalton, PhD", who produced a similar remark commented in my blog "Thomas Dalton responds to Roberto Muehlenkamp and Andrew Mathis (4)" , and the hilarious gullibility of supposedly skeptical "Revisionists" in falling for the mendacious smear against three HC bloggers by a certain obsessed sociopath (commented i.a. on the Skeptic Society Forum’s thread "A side note"). And, of course, this bitching about my humble person in the "Epilogue":

It links to him attacking Lisciotto and blogbuster who posted on this forum and gave us links to the aktion reinhard camp website that was attacked in 2006 by friends of the HC group. Lisciotto was the one who worked in IT and figured out the HC crowd hired some punk to infiltrate and plant fakes on the site so the HC group could declare them fakes and then take over from the long time operators. Well it failed and they have been bitter ever since. Just look for posts by "blogbuster" on this site and check out hateblogwatch for the proof.

PS: If you can "easily prove that Bełżec, Sobibór and Treblinka were transit camps", as you claim in the "Epilogue", you might want to take my "Challenge to Supporters of the Revisionist Transit Camp Theory". With 1,274,166 Jews "transited" through those camps in 1942 alone, names should be all over the place.

This is interesting. I thought the HEART group, loosely associated with the old deathcamps.org website which was hijacked and pirated by the HC punks in the from of death-camps.org had friends that had collected emails, calls and other computer evidence that the vandalism and attempted posting of fakes on the aktion site was done by a friend who had the blessing of the HC group? I thought that blogbuster when he posted here was repeatidly showing how the HC crowd refused to attend a conference with these people to answer for their crimes? They even offered to fly the HC boys out there and accomodate them and they still chickened out? Why does Roberto and the HC crowd get to make challenges to others and yet refuse to take on those issued by others? And also did Roberto miss the topics about Jews moving into the Soviet Union, Poland, Israel and America after the war? Wouldn't a lot of Jews have changed their names probably too? Didn't hannover make a bunch of threads about this topic before? I am sure of it.

http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum/
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/The ... 0HEART.htm

What is really shocking is that the holocaust believers over at hateblogwatch LIKE the response of the revisionists.

"Despite being a revisionist rebuttal to the HC crap, the points made are salient and go a long way to show what poor researchers all the Holocaust Controversies members are."

and,

"We strongly advise deniers and believers alike to read this document."

Source: http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/for ... ?f=3&t=257

I guess this site is so damning that the HC crooks tried to launch a cyber attack against it back in February
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/for ... ?f=3&t=244
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/for ... ?f=3&t=239

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9459
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Hannover » 4 years 9 months ago (Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:48 pm)

As for some examples of info. which confirms Jews being resettled in the east see:
Jonathan Harrison's Hoopla: Fallacies of a Believer
and:
Sannhet @ Jews of Poland. Where'd they go?
and:
Joseph Bühler at Nuremberg: 'resettle Jews in Russia'
The Reichsfuehrer-SS has received the task from the Fueher to collect all the Jews of Europe and to resettle them in the North-East of Europe, in Russia.

and:
Steffen Werner: The Second Babylonian Captivity, The Fate of the Jews
in Eastern Europe since 1941
http://vho.org/GB/Books/tsbc/index.html
Werner made a study of varying population densities in the areas and years of interest within the Soviet Union and he discovered, if I remember correctly, that a population increase occurred in the area southwest of Minsk of about 400,000 people for the years 1941-1943.

Plenty more eamples at this forum.

The 'holocaust', falling apart faster than a cheap suit.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
JackBQuick
Member
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 5:41 pm

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby JackBQuick » 4 years 9 months ago (Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:20 am)

Thank's to MGK for taking time writing this response. I spent a little bit of time reading the responses from Holocaust Controversies supporter's on another forum today, and there were nothing short of people calling the authors (MGK) names, never addressing anything....even allegations of neo-Nazism were hauled about from one of the posters.

On the very inside of a Holocaust promoter's body it must feel so mind-shattering to peddle their holocaust story especially in the wake of books such as the ones written by MGK which completely pulls apart the holocaust story, root and branch. For me, I think, that without the heavy backing from state and oppressive laws this entire holocaust story would be long gone - with the mere truth left behind, more or less.

Good show, MGK!

Yours,
Jack B. Quick
The Holocaust belief was doomed from the beginning; it rests on a rotten foundation.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:59 am)

Okay, this is getting very weird. I jumped over to the hateblogwatch website and found a new topic.
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/for ... ?f=3&t=287
It had some information from a German site that blogbuster found.

http://globalfire.tv/nj/13de/zeitgeschi ... eonazi.htm

I used a half assed internet translation so if anyone can correct it, go right ahead. I do not speak German. But the basic elements do come out in this translation.

Here is the caption of the picture of Roberto.

"Roberto Muehlenkamp, secret Nazi, born in the jungle to bring the holo-case basis. His father gassed one day after Hitler came to power three million Jews liechtensteiner."


Here is the article.

Holocaust denier Roberto Muehlenkamp:
The gruesome truth

Of Lesbileila Dummermuth, chairman of the Anti-Fascist League against Holocaust denial

Know we antifascists of the Anti-Fascist League against Holocaust denial, that one with the racist, anti-Semitic and neo-fascist neo-Nazis who deny the obvious historical fact of world history, a unique crime of the murder of six million Jews by the inhuman Nazi regime with pseudo-scientific arguments cynical , never ever allowed to engage in a discussion. These deniers bring their pseudoscientific arguments namely so devilishly clever ago that no normal person is able to refute it. For this reason, we at the Anti-Fascist League against Holocaust denial are basically the view that the most effective and most telling argument against Holocaust denial paragraph 130 of our Penal Code is, the said crimes with up to five years in prison punishes.

Unfortunately, there are still anti-fascists who are foolish enough to want to disprove the deniers on the factual level. This experience shows that nothing good will come out, because the deniers thus an aura of respectability is given. Even more dangerous, however, is that some neo-Nazis holocaustleugnende sent as camouflage antifascists to bring the real anti-fascists into disrepute. The worst among these Trojan donkey is a certain Roberto Muehlenkamp who, together with several of his cronies from the brown swamp the blog "Holocaust Controversies" is derived. On this blog arguments against Holocaust denial are put forward churning that are so feeble that they insufficiently enlightened fellow at historic inner confusion and give the impression that the deniers would probably right.

Together with four other than anti-fascists disguised racist neo-Nazis - Jonathan Harrison, Jason Myers, Sergey Romanov and Nicholas Terry - Roberto Muehlenkamp has set a weighty tome in PDF format on the internet who claims the Holocaust denier Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf and Thomas Kues, who deny the existence of gas chambers in the camps of Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka cynical disprove ("Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. A Critique of the False Hood of Mattogno, Graf and Kues"). What especially Muehlenkamp are here idiocies of itself, is on me. Among other things, he claims, on a square 28 people could stand! This gives the impression Muehlenkamp fraudulently, with the opponents of Holocaust denial if it were loud morons.

Now Mattogno, Graf and Kues have an answer published ("The 'extermination camps' of Operation Reinhard. An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious 'Evidence', Deception and Flawed reasoning of the 'Controversial blogger'"), in which the idiotic arguments of Muehlenkamp and his brown cronies to over 1500 pages torn off and the five alleged "anti-fascists" of ridicule are revealed. This was from the beginning, the objective of this false flag operation.

Who is Roberto Muehlenkamp? Thanks to many years of living under constant threats by guided research, in which they repeatedly under false identities crept into the neo-Nazi milieu, our comrade Andrea Röpke has brought the whole grisly truth about this man to light. Roberto Muehlenkamp is the son of the worst of Nazi criminal, SS-top-and bottom pack leader Adolfo Muehlenkamp, on 31 January 1933, the day after Adolf Hitler came to power, hand three million Jews in Liechtenstein in Vaduz gassed the huge swamps. (See Schmul-Flunkerich Habakkuk, "Adolfo Muehlenkamp, the swamp gas executioner of Vaduz," filth Publishing, 2013). After the war, Adolfo Muehlenkamp escaped with the help of reactionary circles in the Vatican to South America and set up a training camp in the Colombian jungle for right-wing terrorists. In this camp, his son Roberto was born. (Our comrade Andrea Röpke was disguised as a midwife there.)

On 1 September 2001, when 62 Anniversary of Adolf Hitler's invasion of Poland, Adolfo Muehlenkamp flew to Afghanistan and met in a cave with Osama bin Laden, to concoct the attacks on the twin towers. (Our comrade Andrea Röpke was disguised as Dschihadistin, here.) Ten days later, on the night of 10 to 11 September Osama Bin Laden and Adolfo Muehlenkamp met in a New York restaurant striptease to make final retouches on their terrorist plot in whiskey and gin. (Our comrade Andrea Röpke was disguised as a nude dancer, here.)

After the collapse of the towers Adolfo Muehlenkamp flew back to Colombia and built in the jungle training camp for Holocaust deniers, which was attended among others by his son Roberto and of its neo-fascist cronies Jonathan Harrison, Jason Myers, Sergey Romanov and Nicholas Terry. (Our comrade Andrea Röpke was when Shoa Leugnerin disguised it.) Then founded Roberto Muehlenkamp together with its neo-Nazi accomplices Site "Holocaust Controversies" and wrote said ridiculous lampoon of Mattogno, Graf and Kues, all upright antifascists a mockery to making.

We call on all anti-fascists and opponents of Holocaust denial urgently to visit the site "Holocaust Controversies" under any circumstances, and to beware of the Trojan donkey Roberto Muehlenkamp and his accomplices brown!

Honestly, I am rolling in the aisles laughing because the idea that Roberto Muehlenkamp's father was even a nazi is highly doubtful. It appears to me the six million gas chamber believers can not even decide on who in his family was the alleged nazi. Here, they claim his father was Johannes Rudolf Mühlenkamp, born 09-10-1910.
http://www.zimbio.com/Holocaust+denial/ ... Nazi+daddy

First of all, I think these anti fascists are lying about their so called mole Andrea Ropke being in more than one right place at the right time. Planning the 9-11 attacks in a cave with Bin Laden is ridiculous. Second of all, being with Bin laden on september 10th at a strip bar is clearly a rip off of the alternative media conspiracy theorist stories (most of which are true by the way) claiming that the so called hijackers were seen a night or two before september 11th drinking in nude bars - rather, the dopplegangers - who were in fact being guided by Israeli intelligence who were living in Florida right next to the hijackers. Anyone who doubts the Israeli role in 9-11 can read Ryan Dawson's ALL ROADS LEAD TO ISRAEL essay, Albert Pastore's book on 9-11 or even watch MISSING LINKS. Israeli intelligence front Urban Moving Systems was given half a million dollars by the FBI one full month...or was it one full year...leading up to 9-11.

It is clear to me that these guys think that Roberto makes easily refutable arguments to lose on purpose and that is why they are labeling him and his cohorts false flag attackers when it comes to their cut and paste manifesto. That much is true. But I think these accusations about Roberto and Roberto's father allegedly hanging out with Osama is all made up mud slinging.

The lesson in all of this? That exterminationists admit that revisionists have successful counterarguments against the Holocaust Controversies team regarding their plagarising of bibliographies and quotes from other authors of books they clearly haven't read themselves (Alan Dershowitz style of course) in their cut and paste manifesto, and also regarding their picking of only one or two lines from entire documents that overall in the proper context DO NOT point to extermination. But that exterminationists take it a step further and make VERY LIKELY FALSE accusations against Roberto's paternal side of his family and claim he is doing this on purpose instead of just seeing the obvious. That Roberto and his crew are clowns. They are egomaniacs who truly hate nazis, but it's just that they think they are better exterminationist theorists/historians than Chris Webb. Hell, I even found out that the reason Chris Webb booted those guys from his group was because Webb REFUSED to have a discussion forum attached to his main website. When that didn't work, the HC group were busy working on their backup plan which in turn was the other prong of their main mission. To plant fakes over time and declare them fakes and demand that Chris Webb be booted out. Well it failed and Lisciotto who is world renowned in IT, was hired and figured out that it was the HC group behind this attack.

So the guys at HC are not closet nazis. They are just lousy debaters whose egos are so huge that they can not see themselves for what they truly are. And the exterminationists want them to stop arguing for the holocaust because their arguments are so lousy. They are not neo nazis false flagging extermination theorists by secretly working with revisionists. They have been caught snatching IP's and stalking people - well Andrew Mathis anyway. Closet neo nazis do not to that to revisionists. But hey, as we can see with the clowns at HC, the other people on the side of the exterminationist team aren't often that consistent themselves either. However, that is what the 1550 page response of MGK is supposed to prove, and does prove anyway. The attack is not just on the HC crowd; it is also on the exterminationist theory itself as argued by other historians. But yes, it is mostly on the HC crowd.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:03 am)

Roberto Muehlenkamp is the son of the worst of Nazi criminal, SS-top-and bottom pack leader Adolfo Muehlenkamp, on 31 January 1933, the day after Adolf Hitler came to power, hand three million Jews in Liechtenstein in Vaduz gassed the huge swamps. (See Schmul-Flunkerich Habakkuk, "Adolfo Muehlenkamp, the swamp gas executioner of Vaduz," filth Publishing, 2013).


Wow. So they were gassing Jews as far back as 1933? Now we know this is complete and utter horseshit. And these guys accuse Muehlenkamp and the rest of discrediting the exterminationist theories? I also want people to consider the implications of what they were saying before. Apparently someone from the anti fascist group knows how to be certain places where terrorists go that end up attacking America even better, or even WITH certain CIA/Mossad level people? If it was/is true, that is very damning for this anti fascist group because it shows they have shadow government connections. But I think this is hot air. I really doubt that Chris Webb or anyone else from the HEART group would stoop to entertain such nonsense conspiracy theories from even this anti fascist group and their ability to infiltrate places where arab terrorists work. :lol: These guys seem to be as crazy as Andrew Mathis.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Aktion Reinhardt Camps / Holo. Controversies Debunked Ag

Postby Werd » 4 years 9 months ago (Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:47 am)

One more thing. I thought I recognized the globalfire name before. I have read many articles on that before. In fact globalfire is very anti Zionist and pro German.

http://globalfire.tv/nj/english.htm

They have sections on the holocaust and multi culturalism AS USED AND ABUSED BY JEWS.

Someone asked me, why would an anti Zionist, anti Judaism site call Muehlenkamp the son of a nazi who met with Bin laden before 9-11 happened? Is someone playing a practical joke on Muehlenkamp in the revisionist crowd? Did the holocaust extermination/gas chamber theorists get taken in by it?

My answer is this site is merely quoting an article that was authentic and just written by someone else. And they are quoting this genuine article by anti fascists to show how EVEN THE EXTERMINATION THEORISTS don't like these guys. Let's look at the top of the article before it even hits the main title.

"This article first published: 05/10/2013 - source: NJ-authors"

In other words, this anti Zionist site is quoting a pro Zionist group showing how they also hate Muehlenkamp. It would seem to make sense since this site appears to be a library of articles on other websites. Two examples out of many.

http://globalfire.tv/nj/08en/jews/aband ... itanic.htm
Intelligent Jews realise that the Holo-Lie has become untenable

Avraham Burg calls on the Jews to abandon the “Titanic of Lies”. He appeals to reason in order not to drown in the rough sea of holocaust-forgery, holocaust-deceit, holocaust-fraud, holocaust-lies and holocaust-theft. He calls the so-called memory of the holocaust "a rediculous sacrilege and converts piercing pain into hollowness and kitsch".

http://www.latimes.com/news/printeditio ... ?track=rss
Los Angeles Times, 16.11.2008



http://globalfire.tv/nj/08en/holoindust ... remacy.htm
The holocaust:
A Jewish tool to secure ethnic supremacy

"Our present interpretation of the Holocaust has been deliberately devised by American Jewish groups for purposes of ethnic supremacy, political advantage and financial gain ... In more recent years, the Holocaust industry has effectively turned into a shake-down racket in which more and more countries throughout Europe are being bludgeoned into coughing up compensation."

(Norman Finkelstein)
BBC-News Wednesday, 26 Januar, 2000, 16:43 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/ ... 619610.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/619610.stm


Edit 2:
"This article first published: 05/10/2013 - source: NJ-authors"

The source is given as NJ. But as you can see, NJ is the same thing as globalfire. It IS globalfire.
http://globalfire.tv/

The date is given 5-10-13. They mention the new 1550 page reply of Mattogno, Graf and Kues. So the article is new. Therefore it must not mean May 10th but rather October 5th. But today is not the 5th. So what is going on with that date? An honest mistake? Anyone want to take a stab at this?


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 12 guests