Witnesses. Good when they suit your version only??

[borjastick]

Here is an interesting sideline and comparison with a real catastrophe and the witnesses of it, the official investigation and findings, verses the situation we confront - in the accounts of holocaust witnesses - compared with the scientific facts.

The event I am talking about is the disaster of TWA flight 800 which crashed off the New York coast in summer of 1996. A new documentary has been released which I have just seen here: http://watch32.com/movies-online/twa-flight-800-5989.

In a nutshell we have a terrible disaster of the 747 crashing killing all 400 odd passengers and crew. Hundreds of witnesses watched this event in total horror. Some of the witnesses were of a high credibility having been ex military, pilots etc. They all have identical witness claims; they saw one or more rockets rise up from sea level to strike the plane and then saw the resulting fireball and crash into the sea. The documentary is well worth your time.

The convergence of their statements isn't unlike those of the holocaust witnesses who are convinced they saw it all unfold before their very eyes.

Officially the crash happened due to an internal explosion in the centre fuel tank.

The pure irony of all this is the number of obvious jews in the NTSB/FBI senior team. The irony is that the holocaust hinges on witness statements and very little scientific and forensic proof but the witnesses of flight 880's demise were all ignored and discounted, in favour of what appears to my unskilled eyes to be dodgy science.

Witnesses therefore are only of value when the story you wish the world to accept has little else going for it, including the most important thing, scientific proof.

[Werd]

The harrassment and the trial James Sanders had to endure for his book(s) exposing the downing of TWA Flight 800 should proof enough that what the government agencies said really happened was a lie. When someone in a position of authority attempts to use their power to silence you, you know they have very little in way of a counterargument. Kind of like the harrassment revisionists have to deal with.

[Hektor]

Also consider that the Holocaustians actually dismiss the vast majority of (potential) witnesses and anything that doesn't fit their plot.

[JoFo]

Another parallel between the "official" Flight 800 explanation and the holocaust narrative is the crackpot science that both are founded on. I have a relative in the aviation industry and he is adamant that jet fuel could not have created such an explosion. It simply does not combust in such a manner!

Thanks for the link.

[Hannover]

Remember, there are thousands of sworn statements by "eyewitnesses" , "survivors", and "confessors" attesting to witchcraft & sorcery, given in courts of law where witchcraft & sorcery were accepted as absolute fact by governments and the world elite.

The tide is turning.

- Hannover