Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
but no smoke here:
One plume of 'smoke' appears here, intended to create the illusion of 'pit cremations' where 500,000 Jews were absurdly said to have been cremated in order to 'relieve the strain on the over burdened crematoriums'. Why no smoke in the 1st photo? Why no smoke here from the crematoriums said to be used to cremate 'gassing' victims? Remember, the story says that gassings and cremations were 'round the clock'.
Two plumes of smoke here, demonstrates just how easy it is to add smoke when needed. This is the above photo after alteration. This photo handiwork was rec'd by The Revisionist Forum anonymously.
No physical remains, or indications of pits as alleged have ever been found.
- Valued contributor
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Here and there, mostly there
If the rumours of Senator Kerry's affair with Ms. Fonda had proven true it could have been the finish of her career.
'The story says that gassings and cremations were 'round the clock', allegedly 'blackening the sky' as drawn by 'eyewitness' here:'
Some Holocaust 'survivor' tales can have the smoke so thick that it would make day into night and other accounts saying the flames were so immense that it would make night into day.
There are perhaps six (6) aerial recon photos that recorded the camp on six different days. All were taken at a time Holocaust 'facts' have it mass exterminations were entering into and during the heights of the alleged mass extermination program.
Tales tell us there were four facilities at Birkenau operating and that pits were used to take up what the cremation ovens couldn't handle.
Lets say we would have at least three of these locations billowing smoke on any particular day.
That would be 3 x 6 = 18 opportunities out of the six photos to show any of the locations to have been billowing immense amounts of smoke.
And what do we see in any of these photos in way of smoke? One. And that would be the recent Aug.23, 1944 photo from the British archives which shows one image of smoke rising up out of one of the five locations that should all have been billowing away. And that would be the photo that some sneaky revisionist touched up with another column of smoke that demonstrates how easy it is to fake smoke images.
Thus we include the Aug,23 photo as just another one that doesn't show any smoke if we did a reverse and eliminated the original forgery image.
Six photos showing four chimneys and any other places where the alleged cremations would have been taking place in pits and no (0) smoke.
Statistically we should be seeing at least one, if not way more authentic images of real smoke instead of none (0).
Statistically it all means - No smoke, no Holocaust.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests