Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
avatar
carlo_ch
Member
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 10:56 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby carlo_ch » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:23 am)

Regarding a possible "open letter" to Putin: you may have seen the current online petition of Italian academics who demand a "Nuremberg-like trial for Israel over Gaza". The petition was initially startet by http://www.historiamagistra.it, a cultural history magazine. The petition is being covered by several media outlets, notably Russian RT, Iranian PressTV, and Israeli Haaretz... :-)

http://rt.com/news/178220-italy-gaza-trial-israel/
http://presstv.com/detail/2014/08/06/37 ... or-israel/
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... m-1.609046


PS: Graf/Kues/Mattogno in their 2010 book on Sobibor (p. 374):

"We believe that our hypothesis [that Stalin retained evacuated Jews in the USSR after the war and deported them to Siberia] is the only one to explain the facts in a convincing way. A decision on its validity, however, will have to wait for the opening of the Russian archives – if that should ever occur. For the time being, though, it seems that this will not take place in the near future."



User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Hannover » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:58 am)

Carlo:
So in theory, "Evakuation" did not mean extermination, yet in practice it often did and for some perhaps even should mean a death sentence for many Jews, albeit not by murder (neither gas nor bullets).
Yet, no one, and I mean no one has produced the alleged mass graves even though they supposedly know exactly where they are AND they have actually searched for these alleged mass graves. Not just Sturdy-Colls , but people like A. Kola. IOW, there have been searches for these claimed mass graves, but to no avail.
Did some people die? Of course, people die wherever they are. It would be normal that areas in which people were gathered in a wide variety of numbers would incur deaths, just like in every town, small or large. In fact, lack of deaths would be next to impossible. Deaths are to be expected, nothing sinister about that basic fact.

borjastick's previous post has a lot going for it.
And BIROBIDJAN! indeed.
carlo_ch wrote:Regarding a possible "open letter" to Putin: you may have seen the current online petition of Italian academics who demand a "Nuremberg-like trial for Israel over Gaza". The petition was initially startet by http://www.historiamagistra.it, a cultural history magazine. The petition is being covered by several media outlets, notably Russian RT, Iranian PressTV, and Israeli Haaretz... :-)

http://rt.com/news/178220-italy-gaza-trial-israel/
http://presstv.com/detail/2014/08/06/37 ... or-israel/
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... m-1.609046


PS: Graf/Kues/Mattogno in their 2010 book on Sobibor (p. 374):

"We believe that our hypothesis [that Stalin retained evacuated Jews in the USSR after the war and deported them to Siberia] is the only one to explain the facts in a convincing way. A decision on its validity, however, will have to wait for the opening of the Russian archives – if that should ever occur. For the time being, though, it seems that this will not take place in the near future."
Given that the Nuremberg Show Trials were sham procedures, any "Nuremberg-like trial" is not the way to go. There is plenty of proof of Israeli war crimes without stooping to the level of the Nuremberg farce.

In lieu of the fact that Russia bans scrutiny of the 'holocaust' storyline means the chances of getting access to their archives is next to nil, which indeed says something about the complete fraudulence of the 'holocaust' storyline. Also Carlo, the onus is upon the accusers to prove their case, that's how legitimate jurisprudence works. Certainly it is not up to Revisionists to disprove what has never been proven. In fact the vast numbers of Jews after the war is quite convincing that they were not 'exterminated' as is alleged.

I can see we're getting back to the tired 'where did they go' canard which has been debunked repeatedly by so called "survivors" themselves.
recommended:
J. Graf and the illogical canard: 'Where did Jews go then?'

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby hermod » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:41 am)

carlo_ch wrote:What happened to the evacuated Jews during and after the war? Solution: Professional excavation (as at any other site of mass murder) and opening of all the relevant Sovjet archives


Except for the Reinhardt camps, one should always keep in mind that there are mass graves in Eastern Europe anyway before stating "I've found a Nazi mass grave!" if/when some are found in the future. Large epidemics, the Holodomor, Soviet executions, executions of "Partisans" & several ultra-violent wars certainly left mass graves in those areas. That's why I think that excavations should be focussed on the areas of the former Reinhardt camps, where the identity of the perpetrators or alleged perpetrators is not discussed (no Soviet execution sites there as far as I know).

As far as documents in Soviet archives are concerned, I don't expect many great discoveries from there, the Soviets having probably destroyed a large part of the captured Nazi documents a long time ago. But who knows?
"But, however the world pretends to divide itself, there are ony two divisions in the world to-day - human beings and Germans. – Rudyard Kipling, The Morning Post (London), June 22, 1915

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Hannover » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:56 am)

It's quite reasonable to assume that Jews had / have access to the Russian archives, think Arolsen Archives where only 'approved' individuals are allowed. If there was anything at all which supported their wishful thinking we would have seen it long ago.

Opponents of 'holocaust' Revisionism have access to everything yet cannot prove their claims.

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby hermod » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:32 am)

carlo_ch wrote:PS: My current conclusion concerning the process and term of "evacuation" is this: it probably wasn't a "codeword" for extermination, yet NS leaders were aware that many Jews would die in the process (due to exhaustion, malnutrition etc. while working at the front or in Belarussian swamps). To a certain extent, at least some of the NS leaders accepted or even intended this (some legal systems would probably describe this as "conditional intent / dolus eventualis / Eventualvorsatz", i.e. a "so what if they die" attitude. This is stronger than a negligent act, but weaker than a premediated act.)

This would explain why e.g. Goebbels (diary) and Himmler (Posen speech) basically equated "Evakuation" with "Ausrottung", even "Liquidation" (Goebbels). They justified this approach by "Hitler's prophecy" (that Jews would be punished if they start another world war, see his speech of January 30, 1939, as well as his testament) and by stating that "if we don't eliminate them, they would eliminate us (as partisans etc.)".

So in theory, "Evakuation" did not mean extermination, yet in practice it often did and for some perhaps even should mean a death sentence for many Jews, albeit not by murder (neither gas nor bullets).


When you read the parts dealing with the Jews in Goebbels' diaries, especially the parts written after the 'incriminating' quotes, you can clearly see that Goebbels wished the physical liquidation of Europe's Jews (http://codoh.com/library/series/3110/). He was talking about something that he wished, not about something that was taking place. He even deplored that the Jews were only evacuated, not killed as he wished. Goebbels' extreme antisemitism is nothing new. Not a big deal. Anyway, the conquered Eastern territories and alleged death camps were not part of Goebbels' job. His job was to make propaganda (Minister of Propaganda) and administer Berlin (Gauleiter of Berlin).

When you translate "ausrottung" by "elimination", Himmler's Posen speech is pretty inocuous (assuming Himmler's Posen speech is not partly a forgery).

And Hitler's speech of January 30, 1939 is systematically cut when quoted (see the video and the sentence in red below) because the following sentences patently demonstrated that Hitler didn't mean mass murder when he talked about "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe" on that day and when he subsequently referred to that prophecy on numerous occasions.

Nuremberg farcical 'evidence':


And there is yet one more topic on which I would like to speak on this day, perhaps not only memorable for us Germans: I have been a prophet very often in my lifetime, and this earned me mostly ridicule. In the time of my struggle for power, it was primarily the Jewish people who mocked my prophecy that, one day, I would assume leadership of this Germany, of this State, and of the entire Volk, and that I would press for a resolution of the Jewish question, among many other problems. The resounding laughter of the Jews in Germany then may well be stuck in their throats today, I suspect.

Once again I will be a prophet: should the international Jewry of finance (Finanzjudentum) succeed, both within and beyond Europe, in plunging mankind into yet another world war, then the result will not be a Bolshevization of the earth and the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation (Vernichtung) of the Jewish race in Europe. Thus, the days of propagandist impotence of the non-Jewish peoples are over.

National Socialist Germany and Fascist Italy possess institutions which, if necessary, permit opening the eyes of the world to the true nature of this problem.


Many a people is instinctively aware of this, albeit not scientifically versed in it.

At this moment, the Jews are still propagating their campaign of hatred in certain states under the cover of press, film, radio, theater, and literature, which are all in their hands. Should indeed this one Volk attain its goal of prodding masses of millions from other peoples to enter into a war devoid of all sense for them, and serving the interests of the Jews exclusively, then the effectiveness of an enlightenment will once more display its might. Within Germany, this enlightenment conquered Jewry utterly in the span of a few years.

Peoples desire not to perish on the battlefield just so that this rootless, internationalist race can profit financially from this war and thereby gratify its lust for vengeance derived from the Old Testament. The Jewish watchword “Proletarians of the world, unite!” will be conquered by a far more lofty realization, namely: “Creative men of all nations, recognize your common foe!”


Knowing this, one has to be a first class crook to say that Hitler was talking about a genocidal policy when he warned of "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe" if there was another world war against Germany in the future.

Hitler was talking about crushing the Jewish power on a continetal scale through propaganda/education as what had been done in Germany during the previous years. "Enlightenment" meant propaganda/education. The German agency dealing with propaganda at that time was called "Reichs Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda (Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda, RMVP).
Last edited by hermod on Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"But, however the world pretends to divide itself, there are ony two divisions in the world to-day - human beings and Germans. – Rudyard Kipling, The Morning Post (London), June 22, 1915

avatar
carlo_ch
Member
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 10:56 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby carlo_ch » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:49 am)

Many thanks Hannover and Hermod for your detailed replies and interesting links. The Jewish News Archive pieces on Sowjet evacuations of Jews to Uzbekistan and other regions are fascinating indeed (http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... 379a20e63f)

avatar
TruthSeeker1991
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:05 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby TruthSeeker1991 » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:15 pm)

Eric Hunts video on Treblinka is quite interesting and detailed

User avatar
Inquisitor
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:40 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Inquisitor » 3 years 1 week ago (Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:59 am)

Hannover wrote:It's quite reasonable to assume that Jews had / have access to the Russian archives, think Arolsen Archives where only 'approved' individuals are allowed. If there was anything at all which supported their wishful thinking we would have seen it long ago.

Opponents of 'holocaust' Revisionism have access to everything yet cannot prove their claims.

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

- Hannover



Exactly! The whole Caroline Sturdy-Colls farce is proof that they still desperately want to officially/technically prove Revisionism wrong, despite the transparently deceitful claims by many exterminationists that Revisionists should just be "ignored" or the like and not challenged at all. But they failed spectacularly again! They want real proof so badly they can taste it - but thus far, each effort (ala Sturdy-Colls) only adds more fuel to the Revisionist fire. And why is that? Because they are chasing moldy old propaganda, twisted fantasies, and mendacities of every conceivable stripe!

User avatar
NLH
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:28 pm
Location: England, UK

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby NLH » 3 years 5 days ago (Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:49 pm)

Well, it looks like David has responded to Erics reply, amd will post it soon: https://www.facebook.com/antizionist/po ... 2536480662
"Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."
- Kitty Hart-Moxon, Jewish Holocaust Survivor.

June 1998 testimony, USC Shoah Foundation, Visual History Archive.
Part 2 - YouTube - 1:21:42

avatar
Eric Hunt
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:20 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Eric Hunt » 3 years 4 days ago (Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:17 pm)

What will his response be?

Name-calling? Character assassination?

He refuses to debate on Ry Dawson's show.

Many people have been asking to have us on their radio shows together in the past.

David Cole refuses to debate. It's safer to call me a liar and refer to my past in snarky third person Facebook posts.

Dawson would be a great moderator. It's no surprise he doesn't want to debate.
I mean, look at the Revisionist case ----

treblinka-holohoax-hoax-holocaust-mass-graves-caroline-sturdy-cols.jpg


David Cole wants to sell misidentified delousing stations as "homicidal gas chambers disguised as shower rooms" at Treblinka but not Majdanek or Auschwitz! No sir...
Watch THE TREBLINKA ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX

http://holocausthoaxmuseum.com/treblinka-archaeology-hoax

Semitism = Jewish Supremacism

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 974
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Werd » 3 years 4 days ago (Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:52 pm)

Quoted for posterity.

Ry Dawson
Yesterday at 12:56 ·

Japan time Monday night Vinny Eastwood show. Same night Eric Hunt returns reacting to David Cole Stein's book. Professionally not hostilely. Next Pepe Escobar on Iraq Tuesday night and the WRH show 4-7am Wednesday. then Peter Lavelle Thursday or Friday, I'm currently working that out, on the media coverage of Ukraine. Next week an Israeli apologist and I will debate. Followed by Jason Eckhardt discussing identity politics of the left and right. Possibly Gilad Atzmon will also return I'm waiting on the mail same for Norman Finkelstein.

Tommy Pickett Maybe one day, a Cole stein/Hunt show?! A man can dream.
Yesterday at 20:41 · 1

Ry Dawson Maybe
20 hrs

David Cole Stein Nope! No offense to you, Ry. You know I love ya. But Hunt? Nope. It's taken me a sonofabitchin week to find the time to reply to Hunt. If I can stay awake for another hour, I should be able to post it tomorrow some time.
20 hrs · 1

Vinny Eastwood Which hunt? not Mike Hunt I hope?
15 hrs

David Cole Stein No, it's his British cousin York Hunt.
11 hrs · 2

Neil Hiatt Looking forward to the Hunt interview, and very much looking forward to Davids reply.
7 hrs · 1

Neil Hiatt What I hope for is respectful debate, as this is what is needed to iron things out to get to the truth. I welcome this kind of discussion, and have very little time for school yard antics. I have listened to a number of interviews where they blast you for some of the things you have said David, or the way you say them (but they are guilty aswell (although Eric has taken a better stance than the others)). And you may very well mean them, I don't know. But, what they don't realise is what you have been going through lately family wise, and this effects things to a great deal. I tend to look beyond this aspect, and only deal in the bare bones of the matter. I hope this makes sense.
6hrs

Cute isn't it, folks?

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Dresden » 3 years 4 days ago (Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:13 am)

Werd said:

"Cute isn't it, folks?"

Yeah, real cute.

Vinny Eastwood: "Which hunt? not Mike Hunt(my cunt) I hope"

David Cole Stein: "No, it's his British cousin York Hunt(your cunt)"

Lotta class there, David and Vinny! :bootyshake:
"I am willing to go to prison for the sake of the truth and the German nation. ... You are determined to destroy my convictions by imprisoning me, but it is beyond your power to do so." - Sylvia Stolz

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Dresden » 3 years 4 days ago (Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:29 am)

Tommy Pickett said: "Maybe one day, a Cole stein/Hunt show?! A man can dream"

Ry Dawson said: "Maybe"

David Cole Stein said: "Nope! No offense to you, Ry. You know I love ya. But Hunt? Nope"

As I said before.....You'd have better luck getting Deborah Lipstadt to debate, than David Cole.
"I am willing to go to prison for the sake of the truth and the German nation. ... You are determined to destroy my convictions by imprisoning me, but it is beyond your power to do so." - Sylvia Stolz

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 974
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Werd » 3 years 4 days ago (Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:56 am)

"David wrote a rebuttle today and Eric is on the show in three hours."
-Ryan Dawson. Posted at rys2sense.com

Then there is the continuation of the discussion on Facebook.
Ry Dawson
David Cole David Cole Stein i look forward to reading it. My role is to allow people to speak since it is so censored and it will hash out and the truth will win in the end based on the evidence. Some people though like R F will never be on my show because they're just idiots. Eric doesn't even really care too much about a David, he is much more interested in debunking Caroline Colls, who I have to say is a shit archeologist.

I think Eric is looking at lack of physical evidence where as david is saying so what there are documents about the numbers and such which point to what happened.
1 hr · Edited · 1

Ry Dawson
I don't have good three way software for three different countries either. And next interview with David which I stated before all this stuff broke out will be on the non holocaust stuff in his hilarious book.
1 hr · Edited

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Eric Hunt's response to David Cole / Treblinka

Postby Hannover » 3 years 4 days ago (Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:14 am)

So again, Cole provides no proof for his claims. He seems rather good at low class bar room chat however. :drunken:

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny. The tide is turning.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests