Nessie wrote:We have argued before so you know me.
Yes, i already know who you are.
Nessie wrote:Cherry picking involves using only the evidence which confirms the hoped for outcome. So with regards to the above witnesses, what is ignored, what is cherry picked?
Cherry picking already provided, hence here are contradictions:
Tauber contradicted by Kula regarding the appearance of the corpses. Kula contradicted by Tauber regarding the appearance of the Kula columns. Tauber and Nyiszli contradicted by the aerial photo/physical evidence regarding position of columns. Nyiszli contradicted by Tauber regarding position of columns. And so on.
Nessie wrote:I used Dachau to show how gassing cellar does not equal homicidal gassing as you claim as a non sequitur. Dachau is the evidence that the existence of a gas chamber does not mean exterminationists say there were homicidal gassings a a certain camp. Yes I argued there were too many facilities at Auschwitz for it just to be a camp. Other camps, like POW ones had none at all. They were built only where they expected lots of people to die, like Birkenau and not the POW camps. Hence not a non sequitur.
So again - I did not say a word about Dachau being non sequitur, hence your classic strawman, another popular fallacy in our list. "Gassing cellar equal to homicidal gas chamber" is exterminationists´nonsense, non sequitur in the case of Krematorium II. I clearly provided examples of non sequiturs, so here again and for the last time and be sure to finally read it, this is not Rodoh, but Codoh with guidelines: "For instance - there was a gassing cellar in Krematorium II = there must have been a homicidal gas chamber for murder. There were four crematoria in Birkenau = there must have been cremation of victims of mass murder. There is a smoke in the photo = there must have been cremation of victims of gassings."
Do you see something about Dachau? No, regarding Dachau and its still changing version see other threads.
The rest is quite incoherent, but it looks like an admission that you admit you were the one who produced that non sequitur how is cremation capacity allegedly too large to be innocent only because you reach conclusions not supported by premise and you are ignorant and apply personal incredulity. Thanks for this admission,
Nessie said: "Other camps, like POW ones had none at all.....like Birkenau and not the POW camps. "
- unfortunately for you, Birkenau was a POW camp!
Extra for you, "KGL" stands for "Kriegsgefangenenlagers" hence a camp for prisoners of war, that´s how was Birkenau camp called in the documents.
Nessie said: "They were built only where they expected lots of people to die"
- exactly, they expected it at Auschwitz-Birkenau after previous experiences, but fortunately, because typhus was later "under control" and because of population which never met high projected figures - people were not dying as expected.
Nessie wrote:I do not know who Franz Blaha is, so you have made up that I consider him not credible, strawman. He may be, but that is for me to decide not you.
Is it not my problem you lack basic knowledge of the subject, hence my only mistake was an assumption you are at least basically educated and know the famous witness of Dachau homicidal gassings. Your accusation of strawman is hence false, again. But you are not even basically educated despite challenging you to do it more than two years ago when I already educated you about other basic things (Nessie did not know what is claimed to be gas chambers at Auschwitz, their location in crematoria etc.).
Now you know Franz Blaha (p. 172)
, so tell us your position regarding Dachau.
Do your opponents a favor, go and educate yourself about the basic knowledge of the subject before joining debates where is at least a basic level of knowledge required.