The flawed Bischoff letter

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Goethe
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:41 am

The flawed Bischoff letter

Postby Goethe » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sat Feb 28, 2004 5:55 pm)

Here's something from Irving's site that is interesting and is on target with what is discussed here.

"Thomas Dunskus of France has spotted three more irregularities in the writings of Auschwitz architect Kurt Bischoff, Monday, February 17, 2003"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Auschwitz/ ... 70203.html

The Bischoff letter: more flaws

ON page 210 of his book, Professor Robert van Pelt publishes part of a letter, supposedly written by Bischoff to his superior, Hans Kammler, in Berlin announcing the operationability of Krema II at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
What is surprising is that in such a relatively important letter and in the small segment shown, there are 3 spelling errors:

Nachbetrieb instead of Nachtbetrieb
funtionieren instead of funktionieren
Die instead of Dies
The other surprising thing about this letter is that its date, 29 January 1943, is the same as that of the Tomitschek/Swoboda note on the electricals for Krema II.

Bischoff states in his letter that the ovens were started up and performed well; on the other hand the Tomitschek/Swoboda note states that the electricals needed another two weeks to be connected , one wonders how the ovens worked without the blowers for the forced draft.

Thomas Dunskus
8, route de Biac
F-33760 Faleyras
Tel.: + 33 - (0)5 56 23 66 12

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 4 guests