Josef Buehler's conviction at Nuremberg / based upon what?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10064
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Josef Buehler's conviction at Nuremberg / based upon what?

Postby Hannover » 5 years 6 months ago (Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:13 am)

see Hermod's posts on Josef Buehler, the German deputy governor of General Government:
hermod @ / Tim O'Neill: Nazis never denied 'holocaust'

Concerning Buehler, it is revealing that in spite of the notorious Smirnov's unfounded allegations at Nuremberg Buehler was convicted & hanged for murdering Jews when Buehler had nothing to do with the specific treatment of Jews and he had no way to answer the specifics as to where they were transported when asked by Smirnov.

I would be interested in knowing who was directly responsible for determining the specific destinations of the transported Jews and what they had to say at Nuremberg or any other trial. That's if their testimony is actually available, if they were prosecuted. And if they were not prosecuted, given the narrative, we must ask why not?

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The Internet is demolishing the false narrative promoted by arrogant Jewish supremacists. From the slaughter of the Palestinians to the lies of Auschwitz the world is recognizing the dangers of Jewish supremacism.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests