Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Atigun
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Atigun » 3 years 2 months ago (Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:13 pm)

I am curious as to why there is no blue staining of the ceiling of the supposed gas chamber.

Rogal Dorn
Member
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Rogal Dorn » 3 years 1 month ago (Sun Sep 18, 2016 1:46 am)

Atigun wrote:I am curious as to why there is no blue staining of the ceiling of the supposed gas chamber.


Should there be visible staining? The Krema buildings operated for 2 years. Considering that delousing chambers operated for many hours per delousing, a gassing of upto 2000 people in these Kremas took 15-30 minutes and then the ventilation system kicked in. And if a homicidal gassing really happened, what do you think the chamber looked like after the last corpse had been dragged out? Squeaky clean or soaked with blood and feces? Some washing would be necessary to keep the lie upright that this was an innocuous shower hall for the next batch of Jews. Ceiling might have not been washed, but #1 point is still exposure time to HCN per day.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby hermod » 3 years 1 month ago (Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:39 am)

Rogal Dorn wrote:
Atigun wrote:I am curious as to why there is no blue staining of the ceiling of the supposed gas chamber.


Should there be visible staining? The Krema buildings operated for 2 years. Considering that delousing chambers operated for many hours per delousing, a gassing of upto 2000 people in these Kremas took 15-30 minutes and then the ventilation system kicked in.


With a ventilation system upside down for gassings with a poison gas as light as hydrogen cyanide, one could wonder what would be the point of even using such a dumb and ineffective ventilation after a gassing. And the alleged gas chamber of Krema I had no active ventilation system at all anyway.

Image

And if a homicidal gassing really happened, what do you think the chamber looked like after the last corpse had been dragged out? Squeaky clean or soaked with blood and feces? Some washing would be necessary to keep the lie upright that this was an innocuous shower hall for the next batch of Jews. Ceiling might have not been washed, but #1 point is still exposure time to HCN per day.


Since there was no storage area for alleged gassed bodies, cremation time was in fact the duration setting the moment when the last body could have been dragged out. Since it's nonsensical to claim that the room was washed before the last dead body had been removed, the 'gas chamber' would have been washed only around 6 days after a specific gassing at best.

"But, however the world pretends to divide itself, there are ony two divisions in the world to-day - human beings and Germans. – Rudyard Kipling, The Morning Post (London), June 22, 1915

Rogal Dorn
Member
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Rogal Dorn » 3 years 1 month ago (Mon Sep 19, 2016 12:23 am)

hermod wrote:Image



Good point. But if air was blowing into the chamber, the poison air has to go somewhere. So even if corpses are lining the sides, it will force its way through nooks and crannies.

Remember this was designed as a morgue, and even in a morgue bodies litter the floor.

Of course, this is assuming the ventilation system was not reversed (e.g. by remounting the in/out pumps) by the nazis and they employed it the same way it was designed in the blueprints.

hermod wrote:Since there was no storage area for alleged gassed bodies


You think the Auskleideraum (morgue 2) which is of equal size as morgue 1 wouldn't cut it as storage area?

Also, 6 days = 144 hours; to cremate 2000 Jews (2000 / 144) means in 1 hour on average only 13 Jews could be cremated? Even though Krema II had 15 muffles? And this is assuming no more than 1 Jew fits in a muffle. 1 child and 1 infant baby each get an entire muffle to themselves and still need 1 hour to be cremated.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby hermod » 3 years 1 month ago (Mon Sep 19, 2016 4:38 am)

Rogal Dorn wrote:Good point. But if air was blowing into the chamber, the poison air has to go somewhere. So even if corpses are lining the sides, it will force its way through nooks and crannies.


Since HCN is lighter than air, the ventilation system would have mostly pumped out the fresh air which had just been pumped in. Put some very small ice cubes in a fish tank full of water. Install a pump that sucks water at the bottom and blows it at the top. And you'll see that your pump won't suck a significant amount of ice cubes (if any) but will suck the water it had just blown at the top, with the ice cubes remaining quite untouched at the top of the fish tank.

Remember this was designed as a morgue, and even in a morgue bodies litter the floor.


Indeed. But dead bodies can be stacked in an orderly fashion in a morgue while people fall and die in a chaotic fashion in a gas chamber. One only needs to instruct the workers operating a morgue and tell them not to stack dead bodies against the ventilation openings. But one could of course not say: "Hey Jews. Welcome to Birkenau. You're about to see our best gas chamber. But you must in no way fall against the ventilation openings when falling dead because that would make our gas chamber unworkable. Thanks for your cooperation."

Of course, this is assuming the ventilation system was not reversed (e.g. by remounting the in/out pumps) by the nazis and they employed it the same way it was designed in the blueprints.


Never heard any historian, witness, laborer or engineer even claim that the Nazis had reversed the ventilation system of their morgues when allegedly opting for gas chambers. It's said they just opened holes in the roof and installed Kula columns.

You think the Auskleideraum (morgue 2) which is of equal size as morgue 1 wouldn't cut it as storage area?


An undressing room full of dead bodies would have demolished the alleged deception of a mere sanitary shower. Don't forget that the alleged doomed Jews were supposed to believe they were to get a shower and that they were supposed to go from morgue 2 (alleged undressing room) to morgue 1 (alleged gas chambers) for that. In other words, morgue 2 could only look like an innocuous undressing room if the deception was to be preserved.

Also, 6 days = 144 hours; to cremate 2000 Jews (2000 / 144) means in 1 hour on average only 13 Jews could be cremated? Even though Krema II had 15 muffles? And this is assuming no more than 1 Jew fits in a muffle. 1 child and 1 infant baby each get an entire muffle to themselves and still need 1 hour to be cremated.


True. Even with a convoy of kids half as big as an adult only, cremation time would have been very significant. 3 days & nights before being able to wash the room, still a very long time. HCN would have had more than enough time to enter and embed in the walls anyway.
"But, however the world pretends to divide itself, there are ony two divisions in the world to-day - human beings and Germans. – Rudyard Kipling, The Morning Post (London), June 22, 1915

Rogal Dorn
Member
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Rogal Dorn » 3 years 4 weeks ago (Mon Sep 19, 2016 2:10 pm)

hermod wrote:Since HCN is lighter than air, the ventilation system would have mostly pumped out the fresh air which had just been pumped in. Put some very small ice cubes in a fish tank full of water. Install a pump that sucks water at the bottom and blows it at the top. And you'll see that your pump won't suck a significant amount of ice cubes (if any) but will suck the water it had just blown at the top, with the ice cubes remaining quite untouched at the top of the fish tank.

Indeed. But dead bodies can be stacked in an orderly fashion in a morgue while people fall and die in a chaotic fashion in a gas chamber. One only needs to instruct the workers operating a morgue and tell them not to stack dead bodies against the ventilation openings. But one could of course not say: "Hey Jews. Welcome to Birkenau. You're about to see our best gas chamber. But you must in no way fall against the ventilation openings when falling dead because that would make our gas chamber unworkable. Thanks for your cooperation."

Never heard any historian, witness, laborer or engineer even claim that the Nazis had reversed the ventilation system of their morgues when allegedly opting for gas chambers. It's said they just opened holes in the roof and installed Kula columns.


And if the corpses were blocking the Entlüftung, and the HCN was in the upper areas of the chamber, any artificial air being introduced into the chamber would still trigger the laws of pressure equilibrium. So the gas still had 4 holes in the roof to escape from. After all, it is lighter than the air that is being introduced...

An undressing room full of dead bodies would have demolished the alleged deception of a mere sanitary shower. Don't forget that the alleged doomed Jews were supposed to believe they were to get a shower and that they were supposed to go from morgue 2 (alleged undressing room) to morgue 1 (alleged gas chambers) for that. In other words, morgue 2 could only look like an innocuous undressing room if the deception was to be preserved.


You are assuming a false premise: I have yet to hear one survivor testimony that a batch of jews was waiting in the undressing room (morgue 2) while Sonderkommando were busy hauling bodies off the gas chamber (morgue 1).

There may be Auschwitz testimonies of "jews waiting outside a gas chamber" but nowhere does this imply that it was because the gas chamber was full of dead bodies and the SK were moving them out.

The way I understand it, 1 gassing, and and the SK had the building to themselves for some 20 hours of cremation and cleanup, and then the next gassing without anyone waiting outside.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Hannover » 3 years 4 weeks ago (Mon Sep 19, 2016 3:08 pm)

Roger Dorn, you said:
1. And if the corpses were blocking the Entlüftung, and the HCN was in the upper areas of the chamber, any artificial air being introduced into the chamber would still trigger the laws of pressure equilibrium. So the gas still had 4 holes in the roof to escape from. After all, it is lighter than the air that is being introduced...

2. You are assuming a false premise: I have yet to hear one survivor testimony that a batch of jews was waiting in the undressing room (morgue 2) while Sonderkommando were busy hauling bodies off the gas chamber (morgue 1).

3. There may be Auschwitz testimonies of "jews waiting outside a gas chamber" but nowhere does this imply that it was because the gas chamber was full of dead bodies and the SK were moving them out.

4. The way I understand it, 1 gassing, and and the SK had the building to themselves for some 20 hours of cremation and cleanup, and then the next gassing without anyone waiting outside.

1. Wrong. Such an absurd ventilation would have endangered the entire site. Besides, it's never claimed that the four non-existent holes were used for ventilation.

2. You clearly do not know the impossible narrative you are trying to defend. It's widely alleged that Jews were lined up & waiting outside, duped into thinking they were about to get showers.

3. Now you contradict yourself and admit Jews were allegedly waiting outside. Plus, your position in #1 meant that these alleged waiting Jews would have been gassed by your claimed ventilated gas from the alleged but non-existent four holes.

4. You "understand" wrong. The impossible storyline states that the gassings were on an industrial scale, and during many periods were non-stop.

You really need to learn what is claimed, as impossible as it is.

I suggest you read:
R.Muehlenkamp: 'gas chambers' were hosed down, so no cyanide
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3706

Also from another thread:
Hannover wrote:There is so much wrong and so much that is simply impossible about the 'holocaust' storyline that it's difficult to choose just one.

- The fact that not a single verifiable excavation of the alleged enormous mass graves and it's alleged contents of Jew corpses can be shown is a real contender.
- The doctored / faked photos, complete with altered aerial photos, are right up there.
On & on it goes.

However, the entire 'gas chambers', Zyklon-B gassing process alleged at Auschwitz / Birkenau works for me as a single example. The claimed 'facts' about it simply refute themselves. That's why I always say that debunking the 'holocaust' storyline is just too easy. The absurd 'shoah' narrative is like a 'cry for help', it's really that ridiculous.

Hannover wrote:Below I have posted what the 'holocaust' storyline claims about the alleged gassings at Auschwitz/Birkenau.
I have commented as the story moves along, in essence the claims are simply impossible.

Note that I have also added this model of what the inside of one of the 'gas chambers' is claimed to have looked like at end of an alleged gassing (up to 2000 per batch), an analysis of this model follows my text below.

Image

The two main 'gas chambers at Auschwitz / Birkenau were exactly the same, supposedly in Kremas II & III. So let's play along with the storyline. Up to 2000 Jews were supposedly gassed until dead, then they were supposedly taken via an elevator to the crematorium directly above.

Fact: as seen in the plans, this elevator is hand drawn, and is only 4 ft X 9 ft. How in the world could 2000 Jews have been loaded onto a 4 ft x 9 ft. hand drawn elevator in just a few minutes? Remember, the storyline says that the gassings and resultant cremations were non-stop for much of the period in question.

We supposedly have another batch of 2000 Jews waiting outside, supposedly being tricked into thinking they were about to receive showers. It would have been impossible to disentangle all the supposedly dead Jews and load 2000 of them onto to this postage stamp of an elevator, hoist them by hand up to the crematory 'ovens' in just minutes.
And this repeated process meant that the crematory ovens above would not have been capable of cremating them in the time alleged, which meant a build-up, a backlog occurred.
The storyline even states that the backlog of the to-be-cremated-gassed-Jews required stacking them outside. Once again, the alleged 2000 Jews were outside in full view of this laughable backlog claim, but supposedly they still thought they were getting 'showers'. Of course, timely aerial reconnaissance photos show nothing of the kind.

Furthermore, while the Jews were waiting outside, the storyline says that a SS man with a gas mask climbed upon the roof of the Kremas (only maybe 18 inches, or close to it, above the ground, Kremas II & III were largely underground) and dropped Zyklon-B granules into a container and lowered it down into the 'holes' in the roof, into the morgues which were supposedly converted into a gas chamber. The waiting 2000 Jews would have a clear view of the man on the roof's activity, yet these 2000 Jews were supposedly not concerned and still thought they were going to get innocent showers. The storyline is utterly ridiculous.

We're not done.

The Zyklon-B pesticide granules took/take hours to complete the outgassing of their cyanide load. The storyline says that this same SS man on the roof, supposedly wearing a highly visible gas mask, withdrew the container up from the 'gas chambers' in just minutes. Remember, the Zyklon-B pesticide granules were allegedly dumped and lowered into the 'gas chambers'. And since we know that the Zyklon-B pesticide would have taken hours to finish releasing it's cyanide load we have a situation where anyone in the entire area would have been vulnerable to gassing.
Yes, the storyline also says that there were vents which were used to remove the gas, but then we are still in a situation where the entire area is vulnerable to cyanide. Not to mention that this certainly would have been noticed by the alleged waiting 2000 Jews. And where does this SS man in a gas mask put the outgassing Zyklon-B pesticide granules which he has supposedly withdrawn, which would be releasing cyanide for hours?

The entire, bizarre story is unsustainable with even the slightest scrutiny. It's no wonder why Jewish supremacists trot out senile, lying 'survivors' (who wouldn't have even survived if the tall tales were true) for emotional impact. No wonder that there are Thought Crime laws against examining this absurd process. 'House of cards' is an understatement.

and:
ASMarques wrote:*** THE GREAT GAS CHAMBER TRAFFIC JAM ***

This would be the one picture I would choose for a crash-course in Holocaust awareness for the intelligent young, lest they forget. Much better than collecting millions of buttons, soda tabs etc.


Image

This is the scale model of Krema II in the Auschwitz Museum, apparently placed behind a glass protection in order to prevent the small dolls being stolen by visitors.

Key to the image:

0 - Reflection of the window on the opposite side of the room.

1 - Underground gallery where many hundreds of victims at a time got undressed for the fake showers in room number 2. According to some Holocaust scholars, this gallery is also supposed to have had fake showers installed in it, just to confuse the undressing victims.

2 - Underground gas chamber, called simply "morgue" or "mortuary cellar" in all German documents and blueprints, in order to fool the future generations of scholars looking for the mysteriously vanished Jewish race. This is where many hundreds of victims were gassed at a time, in a round-the-clock mass murder industrial process by Zyklon B, the same product used to preserve human lives by killing lice (unless the witnesses are lying or very, very confused).

3 - Small elevator bringing daily many thousands of gassed corpses from the underground chamber to the crematories at ground level. Known to the fun-loving SS as "The Little Elevator that Could".

4 - Crematory ovens where many thousands of corpses a day were instantly vaporized, without even having to wait for some heat to dissipate before each door opening, contrary to the ovens in your run-of-the-mill crematory. Alas, the technology of the ovens was one of the best kept secrets in the Reich (unless they were ordinary ovens operated by miracle) and no one has been able to duplicate it.

5 - The famous chimneys, producing lots of smoke, contrary to the chimneys on your run-of-the-mill crematory that produce none. This is attributed to the twisted minds of the German guards who attempted to hide their crimes from the curious in the neighbourhood by using dense curtains of artificial smoke.

Now that you know which room is which, don't let anyone distract your gaze away from the image. Picture the gold-mining brigades, struggling through the corpse-scape, trying not to absorb any cyanide residues trapped among the still palpitating bodies, in order to perform their difficult tasks, such as inspecting body orifices, pulling teeth off, smoking cigarettes and eating sandwiches (according to the Höss testimony).

Then comes the most important part. Wait for a few seconds, take a deep breath, and picture the enormous round-the-clock traffic jam at point number 3, during the process of emptying the gas chamber of bodies, through the small elevator room, with or without (as you prefer) the folks next door waiting, soap in hand, for their shower.

Finally, ask your teacher to point the place, any place, where all those typhus dead were deposited while the live folks were being gassed in the gas chamber the Germans called "a morgue".

If you get a satisfactory answer, please let me know.

- Hannover

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the laughable 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

Image
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby hermod » 3 years 4 weeks ago (Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:05 pm)

Rogal Dorn wrote:And if the corpses were blocking the Entlüftung, and the HCN was in the upper areas of the chamber, any artificial air being introduced into the chamber would still trigger the laws of pressure equilibrium. So the gas still had 4 holes in the roof to escape from. After all, it is lighter than the air that is being introduced...


It's interesting you mention this. After watching The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth again, I now believe that the idea of Zyklon-introduction holes came from real holes for the ventilation of hydrogen cyanide out of delousing gas chambers at Majdanek and that those holes were in fact skylights for passive ventilation. As Hannover pointed out, I've seen no compelling evidence for the existence of holes in the ceiling of the morgues at Birkenau. And as far as I know, no witness ever claimed that the alleged Zyklon-introduction holes were used for ventilation and reopened by anybody after a gassing for this very purpose.



You are assuming a false premise: I have yet to hear one survivor testimony that a batch of jews was waiting in the undressing room (morgue 2) while Sonderkommando were busy hauling bodies off the gas chamber (morgue 1).

There may be Auschwitz testimonies of "jews waiting outside a gas chamber" but nowhere does this imply that it was because the gas chamber was full of dead bodies and the SK were moving them out.

The way I understand it, 1 gassing, and and the SK had the building to themselves for some 20 hours of cremation and cleanup, and then the next gassing without anyone waiting outside.


20 hours? You're still short of around 125 hours, i.e. of 5 days !! And no witness ever claimed that some dead bodies were dragged from morgue 1 to morgue 2 until cremation. Ever heard of morgue 2 as a storage room for gassed corpses???
"But, however the world pretends to divide itself, there are ony two divisions in the world to-day - human beings and Germans. – Rudyard Kipling, The Morning Post (London), June 22, 1915

User avatar
ginger
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:52 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby ginger » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:31 pm)

I was following comments on YouTube NOVA Holocaust on Trial. Aaron Richards commented that "no holes, no holocaust" was wrong and cited a study by Kemel Mazal and McCarthy. I replied and included a link to Vincent Reynouard's film - the subject of this thread - which debunks the research of Kemel et. al. His reply to me was -

"Vincent Reynouard knows he cannot refute the report by Keren, Mazal and McCarthy, so he builds a strawman (that their work isnt plastered on every museum pamphlet) in an attempt to brush it away.

Ask Vincent Reynouard why he doesnt show you the collapsed roof of Krema II's cremation hall. Only the square-shaped holes on Krema III's cremation roof survived because the section was less affected by the explosion than the other parts. He cannot claim the same about Krema II's cremation hall roof segments, but nevertheless he uses it as a strawman to say square = existed, non-square = never existed.

Ask Vince how he can explain the dark spots on the gas chamber roof of both Krema II and III in the 1944 aerial photos while the roofs of the disrobing cellars are smooth and have no spots."

I wondered what people thought of his reply. Is the film of the smooth roof, taken beneath the slap, a picture of the disrobing hall roof? I admit to not understanding the film completely. Is there an explanation for the irregular holes in the roof of the alleged gas chamber at Krema II.

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 975
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Turpitz » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:46 pm)

I believe the supposed 'morgues' were built after the war. Only a commie Jew could come up with this rubbish and only dumb-goy could swallow it. Germans don't built crap like this.

User avatar
Jurgen
Member
Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 6:17 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Jurgen » 3 years 1 week ago (Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:48 pm)

Rogal Dorn wrote:Also, 6 days = 144 hours; to cremate 2000 Jews (2000 / 144) means in 1 hour on average only 13 Jews could be cremated? Even though Krema II had 15 muffles? And this is assuming no more than 1 Jew fits in a muffle. 1 child and 1 infant baby each get an entire muffle to themselves and still need 1 hour to be cremated.


Are you saying that each body took one hour to cremate? What is your source for this?

Does this include the time to clean out a muffle after the body has been burnt, replace the coke and to transport a new body up?

Might I ask, what is your overall position on the holocaust? Are you a Believer, a Doubter or Undecided?

Cheers :)
"The Holocaust narrative actually breaks down on a discrete, factual level, and is only tenable when it is presented as some vague or nebulous larger than life metahistorical event" Mulegino1

User avatar
ginger
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:52 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby ginger » 3 years 1 day ago (Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:37 pm)

Another question about Vincent Reynouard's film - at 9:24 he films the roof of morgue 1, Krema II, saying it was broken in a thousand little pieces; at 11:00 he says the roof fell to the ground, and at 13:02 he is able to crawl under the roof, filming what he saw. So I had the impression the roof is still intact, fell close to the ground and did not shatter into little pieces. It is amazing that many people did not film from below before he did - it was an obvious step - instead researchers seem to focus on aerial photos of dark spots on the roofs. Was he the first to crawl under the roof and film? I don't see any holes - the story of the holes in the alleged gas chamber roof should have been dispensed with long ago.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Hannover » 3 years 1 day ago (Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:52 pm)

ginger wrote:It is amazing that many people did not film from below before he did - it was an obvious step - instead researchers seem to focus on aerial photos of dark spots on the roofs. Was he the first to crawl under the roof and film? I don't see any holes - the story of the holes in the alleged gas chamber roof should have been dispensed with long ago.

Yet the aerial photos forgers have drawn in 'Jews marching to gas chambers' .... 'marching' on a rooftop. :lol:
Image

The laughable aerial photos canard is further demolished here:
'Black Rabbit of Inle' says these photos prove the 'gassing of Jews' / but ....'
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10729

And of course, it's claimed that hundreds of thousands of remains of Jews are still buried at Auschwitz, yet they cannot be shown.

- Hannover

We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (also recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, or 250,000 at Sobibor) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.


The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3344
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Vincent Reynouard: Why the Germans dynamited the Crematoria

Postby Hektor » 3 years 14 hours ago (Wed Oct 19, 2016 5:08 am)

ginger wrote:I was following comments on YouTube NOVA Holocaust on Trial. Aaron Richards commented that "no holes, no holocaust" was wrong and cited a study by Kemel Mazal and McCarthy. I replied and included a link to Vincent Reynouard's film - the subject of this thread - which debunks the research of Kemel et. al. His reply to me was -

"Vincent Reynouard knows he cannot refute the report by Keren, Mazal and McCarthy, so he builds a strawman (that their work isnt plastered on every museum pamphlet) in an attempt to brush it away.

Ask Vincent Reynouard why he doesnt show you the collapsed roof of Krema II's cremation hall. Only the square-shaped holes on Krema III's cremation roof survived because the section was less affected by the explosion than the other parts. He cannot claim the same about Krema II's cremation hall roof segments, but nevertheless he uses it as a strawman to say square = existed, non-square = never existed.

Ask Vince how he can explain the dark spots on the gas chamber roof of both Krema II and III in the 1944 aerial photos while the roofs of the disrobing cellars are smooth and have no spots."

I wondered what people thought of his reply. Is the film of the smooth roof, taken beneath the slap, a picture of the disrobing hall roof? I admit to not understanding the film completely. Is there an explanation for the irregular holes in the roof of the alleged gas chamber at Krema II.
So how do their holes look like, based on what evidence?

And how did the work? The overall process design based on the facilities plus what "witnesses" said. Is completely preposterous. Sure one could have put some people in the morgue and then throw lots of Zyklon B into that room, before closing the door. But for what's claimed that's simply impractical. The lift becomes a bottle neck, if 1000s of corpses are involved. etc. etc.

So what they propose is dilettantish and ridiculous, but they don't tell that to the pilgrims and in their history book. What must a rationally-minded person like myself think about this? Obviously that they're lying or do not know what they're talking about.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 1 guest