Hannover wrote:No, I have plenty of proof. Do I have any that you will accept? No. Nobody does.
What proof would that be? Be specific. Everything that you have presented so far has been refuted. You may not like it, but that's the facts.
And that, again, would be your opinion, Hannover, and not *fact*.
The *fact* is that no revisionist has been able to properly answer for the
Vergasungskeller document.
The *fact* is that no revisionist has been able to show that Adolf Eichmann was coerced in any way in his testimony in Jerusalem.
The *fact* is that cyanide is on the walls of Krema II, even 60 years after it was blown up, and no revisionist has disproved this.
And the *fact* is that the three preceding facts corroborate what eyewitnesses have said about the Holocaust generally and Krema II specifically.
Incidentally, this:
So, in other words, you have no proof of gas chambers.
is not a question.
And, finally, Hannover, any basic logic primer would identify the vast majority of the arguments you put forth as begging the question. The minute you write, "Since we know there were no gas chambers..." you've already begged the question.
I have no problem with debating. I have problems with errors in logic and I intend to expose them wherever I see them. If I had a problem with debating, I would be here -- here of all places.
a.m.
Those that would sacrifice freedom for temporary security deserve neither.