David Irving is getting cold feet, again

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Honest Abe
Member
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:20 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

David Irving is getting cold feet, again

Postby Honest Abe » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Apr 03, 2004 1:14 am)

From the Focal Point website:

"In my view there were limited-scale gassings in the two "Bunkers"
(converted farmhouses) outside the perimeter fence, but not at the huge
underground crematory facilities of which Pelt waffles. (Look at his
difficulties over whether there were holes in the roof -- to insert the
cyanide -- or not)."

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/films/BB ... etter.html
:(

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10001
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:25 am)

Irving is undoubtedly basing this on the work of Fritjof Meyer. Meyer is good at demolishing the ridiculous allegations of massive gassings in facilities attached to the crematoriums,
see:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=881

He is not so good at defending his absurd assertions about gassings in the 'bunkers' which were outside the main grounds,
see:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=626

It's thought that Meyer, in fear of being arrested in Germany, is playing salami Revisionism...piece by piece. He really can't just say there were no gassings, or else.

And poor Irving, he just can't quite get it right. Technical matters are just not his thing. He's also been known to accept absurd 'recorded conversations' which are simply see ludicrous, the Bruns document for example:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=15
and:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=366

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

code yellow
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 8:07 am

Postby code yellow » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:58 am)

:? Isn't Irving up for another Lipstadt trial soon?Maybe he is not totaly doubting,but merely downplaying the whole gassing issue as part of a defense because he feels the odds will be more against him if he totaly "denies"any gassings.Didn't he also accept the gas van allegations because of an entry in an Adolf Eichman statement?

code yellow
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 8:07 am

Postby code yellow » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Apr 03, 2004 9:23 am)

:? "In my veiw,there were limited scale gassings...."That doesn't make sense to me.Why limited scale?I thought the whole idea was to kill off all of Europes Jews,in wich case he is dangerously contradicting his assertion that no documents for for a planed extermination of Jews had ever been found.Was there a plan to exterminate them on a smaller scale?Were these small scale attempts experimental?Hell,I am under the firm opinion that if the Nazis wanted to kill off all of European Jewry,it would have been done,but it didn get done because there was no plan to exterminete Jews.I think he is getting cold feet.He is going to have to explain this "limited scale"theory.

User avatar
Sannhet
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Postby Sannhet » 1 decade 5 years ago (Mon Apr 05, 2004 1:55 am)

I wonder, have these farmhouses ever been tested for Zyklon B residue? And for that matter, if there were only limited-scale killings in the farmhouses, why didn't they just shoot them? The bullet is far more practical and efficient for small numbers than the gas chamber. I thought the whole idea of gas chambers was conceived of specifically because shootings were not efficient enough for large numbers of people?

User avatar
TruthSeeker
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: Lebanon

Postby TruthSeeker » 1 decade 5 years ago (Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:51 am)

The whole idea of gas chambers has exceeded its limitations and have become the very bases on which the entire "holocaust" myth is based. Ironically, the myth of the gas chambers is very easy to topple. 8)

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10001
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 5 years ago (Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:54 am)

Sannhet:
There is nothing left of these farmhouses (curiously labelled 'bunkers'), if they really existed at all.

For more, see Mattogno shoot down weaseling Meyer and Meyer's false claim:
http://vho.org/tr/2003/1/Mattogno30-37.html

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 4 guests