According to the storyline all Jews unable to work at Auschwitz: sick, too old, too young, etc., were gassed.
Yet we know there was a German report of July 26, 1944 that indicates 1,426 Hungarian Jews had received surgeries at Auschwitz since their arrival in May, 1944.
If the claim is that they would be needed for labor, post-recovery, then why would the Germans supposedly gas enormous numbers of Hungarian Jews while at the very same time provide surgeries on large numbers of sick Hungarian Jews?
'The Germans desperately needed labor, but were destroying their labor force'?
Again, the 'holocaust' storyline collapses upon itself.
On 27 July 1944 the administration of Auschwitz compiled a statistical report about the prisoners "temporarily quartered in the camp of the Hungarian Jews.” The document shows that until that date 3,138 Hungarian Jews had received medical treatment at the camp hospital.1,426 of them had undergone surgical operations.42  [b](According to the Holocaust story, a huge number of Hungarian Jews were gassed at Auschwitz between 15 May and 9 July 1944. While not a single one of these alleged gas chamber murders is confirmed by a German document, the medical treatment of 3,138 Hungarian Jews at Auschwitz until 27 July is indeed documented.)
As Polish historian Henry Swiebocki reports, no fewer than 11,246 prisoners underwent surgery at Auschwitz between 10 September 1942 and 23 February 1944. 43  A very strange "extermination camp” indeed, is it not, Dr. Lindtner?
The Moral and Intellectual Bankruptcy of a Scholar: Dr. Christian Lindtner and Holocaust Revisionism
by Jürgen Graf
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/ ... ionism.php
Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurdity of the 'holocaust' narrative is the message.
The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.