And you believe in Mattogno's rare error, yes you said you do.
Did I! Where?
Was it in the same place the book in question states that new arrivals who went straight to the GC only after being tattooed.
Since Mattogno can't support his 'phosgene gassings' position it's curious that you hang onto to such absurdities. Oh well, that's your problem, Rabbit.
His 'phosgene gassings position' certainly hasn't been troubled by the snidey comments you thrown at it.
I dodged nothing
You failed to back up either of the following 'big talk' claims, despite repeated requests:
- "And then Mattogno presents information in the cited link which makes his claim of 'probable' gassing with phosgene preposterous."
- "IOW he is contradicting the very information he publishes and appears to be trying too hard to "do serious science". What's serious about ignoring the facts that he, himself has laid out."
I addressed his points which were incoherent & did not give proof of laughable phosgene gassings.
No, you didn't. You threw a lot of muck and exposed the fact that you're completely unfamiliar with not only the evidence cited by Holocaust historians, but even the actual story of the Natzweiler gassings.
You've embarrassed yourself and are now at a loss.
There is no proof of phosgene gassings, Mattogno nor yourself can produce any. If you could, you would. You cannot.
Yes, I remember you were even unaware that the room had been used for phosgene gas attack training.
Rabbit:It speaks volumes about you that you're shameless enough to post that rubbish.
No where does in those scanned pages does it state, or even hint, that those gassed on arrival were first tattooed.
There we go, more laughable panic mode language.
More laughable 'laughable claims'.
I merely copied it, Horhug posted it. Get over it.
Get over what, H? The fact that you've bare faced lied about the text?
The text is very clear about claims of tattooing just prior to 'gassing'.
You sound like Nessie. He reads whatever he wants into texts too:
It's now confirmed, you do not comprehend English text that is spoon fed to you.
No, but it's been confirmed that you'll lie about a source, and, ridiculously, double down when exposed.
The field is mine, sir.
After all the posts I've had deleted on this forum which expose some tripe you've claimed, I know that only too well.