'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', etc.

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9973
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', etc.

Postby Hannover » 4 years 7 months ago (Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:05 pm)

I'm sure everyone here has seen and heard it expressed :

'Coming to terms with the Holocaust', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', 'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'How could this happen in the cultured land of Beethoven & Goethe?', etc.

The fact of the matter is that it is 'incomprehensible', 'unimaginable' & 'unbelievable' because it is simply impossible. The storyline could not have happened even if someone, some group, some people tried.

In order to prevent the curious from digging deeper and applying scientific standards to the 'holocaust' storyline there must be a gatekeeper with overarching statements to condition the human mind into accepting a narrative which cannot withstand scrutiny, logic, science, & rational thought. Someone who essentially says, 'Yes we know it's difficult to understand, but trust us, it happened because we say it happened.' It gives a green light to flights of fantasy.

A perfect example of this is the constant demands of getting access to children at an early age in order to 'educate' them on the impossible 'holocaust' storyline. It is there that the process of 'believing the unbelievable' begins.

One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.
The above quote was endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Mulegino1
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: 'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', etc.

Postby Mulegino1 » 4 years 7 months ago (Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:48 pm)

Hannover wrote:I'm sure everyone here has seen and heard it expressed :

'Coming to terms with the Holocaust', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', 'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'How could this happen in the cultured land of Beethoven & Goethe?', etc.

The fact of the matter is that it is 'incomprehensible', 'unimaginable' & 'unbelievable' because it is simply impossible. The storyline could not have happened even if someone, some group, some people tried.

In order to prevent the curious from digging deeper and applying scientific standards to the 'holocaust' storyline there must be a gatekeeper with overarching statements to condition the human mind into accepting a narrative which cannot withstand scrutiny, logic, science, & rational thought. Someone who essentially says, 'Yes we know it's difficult to understand, but trust us, it happened because we say it happened.' It gives a green light to flights of fantasy.

A perfect example of this is the constant demands of getting access to children at an early age in order to 'educate' them on the impossible 'holocaust' storyline. It is there that the process of 'believing the unbelievable' begins.

One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.
The above quote was endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

The tide is turning.


Quite coincidentally, I just posted this comment on Unz.com in reply to a pro-revisionist poster:

"Indeed.

To paraphrase conman and windbag Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust must be “kept from our prying eyes and our imagination”, thereby giving it the status of a sacred mystery.

I think it is appropriate to call this pseudo-religion Shoahism. It has become the official inviolable pseudo-religion of the kosher western world, particularly in Western Europe where Shoahite heresy is routinely punished by the Liberal Inquisition.

Perhaps I am being unfair to the Inquisition itself, since its rules of evidence where not as restrictive as those of the Liberal Inquisition. At least Galileo was allowed to present his physical evidence. Evidence which contradicts the official creed of Holocaustianity is not permitted by the Liberal Inquisition. Germar Rudolf’s thorough chemical analysis of the brickwork of the alleged “gas chamber” at Birkenau, approved by the Fresenius Institute, was not allowed to be presented in his defense.

What Shoaism boils down to is the goyim worshiping the Jewish collective."

User avatar
Inquisitor
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:40 am

Re: 'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', etc.

Postby Inquisitor » 4 years 7 months ago (Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:56 pm)

The notion that something is self-evidently true, inviolate, and beyond debate, is something straight out of the dark-ages; howls of heresy and all should anyone dare run afoul of those mandated precepts. That so-called "scholars" and "historians" are universally accepting of such bad-faith and obvious intellectually-bankrupt shenanigans, to the point of personally defending and protecting the idea that debate is off-limits as a matter of course, as if the official "holocaust" narrative was the word of 'God Almighty' himself, effectively exposes them as the priests, acolytes and apostles they are - not men who soberly follow science, reason and logic!

----------

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2567
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: 'Believing the Unbelievable', 'Comprehending the Incomprehensible', 'Imagining the Unimaginable', etc.

Postby borjastick » 4 years 7 months ago (Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:30 am)

Good topic Hannover.

Just to corner those who might be sitting on the fence, and to round up a new crop of young and gullible a new book has been published on the truth of the unbelievable holocaust. Called The Holocaust Case, Defeat of Denial, it is covered in the latest post on his blog by Scrapbook Pages here; https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015 ... /#comments

The book claims to put the lid on any debate or doubt about the claims of the holocaust and is centered around a certain Mel Mermelstein. There are 19 references to Mr Mermelstein in the Forum search engine where one can find that this chap is no stranger to make believe.

The book can be found here on Amazon:http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=The+Holocaust+Case%2C+Defeat+of+Denial%2C

The rule of thumb here with the claims that are so unbelievable is to go with the flow, accept the word of those who know better than you and dare you not ask any awkward questions based on a simple thing called logic. Woe betide those who use science and investigation to doubt that six million people disappeared without a trace...
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 10 guests