lampshades, soap, and such...

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
friedrich braun
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 4:40 am

Postby friedrich braun » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:46 pm)

rrohde wrote:So -- just an eyewitness report?


The Jews make great hay of the fact that it's a pathology report. Of course, such a report is also an eyewitness report and has the same probative value.

User avatar
aemathisphd
Member
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.

Postby aemathisphd » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:40 am)

friedrich braun wrote:Jews and their shabbos goyim lackeys cite this evidence that *A* Nazi made lampshades out of human skin:


Can we get a curb on this kind of rhetoric?

a.m.
Those that would sacrifice freedom for temporary security deserve neither.

User avatar
aemathisphd
Member
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.

Postby aemathisphd » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:41 am)

friedrich braun wrote:
rrohde wrote:So -- just an eyewitness report?


The Jews make great hay of the fact that it's a pathology report. Of course, such a report is also an eyewitness report and has the same probative value.


False. It is an export report and not an eyewitness report. They are different birds.

My father is a forensic economist. He gives expert testimony in personal injury suits, both for plaintiffs and defendants. He is not considered an eyewitnesss.

a.m.
Those that would sacrifice freedom for temporary security deserve neither.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10031
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 9:40 am)

Mathis said:
False. It is an expo[e]rt report and not an eyewitness report.

Hardly. As I have shown, there is much more recent and conclusive info. that debunks this 'expert report' from:

- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DATE: September 28, 1973

- Analysis from the Tanners Council Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati 1982

- General Lucius Clay quoted in : Smith, Jean Edward, Lucius D. Clay, An
American Life, p. 301. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1990

There were no human skin items; which serves to spotlight the fraudulence of Nuremberg and the phoney 'expert reports'.

Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
aemathisphd
Member
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.

Postby aemathisphd » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:08 am)

Hannover wrote:Mathis said:
False. It is an expo[e]rt report and not an eyewitness report.

Hardly. As I have shown, there is much more recent and conclusive info. that debunks this 'expert report' from:

- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DATE: September 28, 1973

- Analysis from the Tanners Council Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati 1982

- General Lucius Clay quoted in : Smith, Jean Edward, Lucius D. Clay, An
American Life, p. 301. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1990

There were no human skin items; which serves to spotlight the fraudulence of Nuremberg and the phoney 'expert reports'.


This assertion hardly disproves my *point*, which was that there is a difference between expert reports and eyewitness testimony.

a.m.
Those that would sacrifice freedom for temporary security deserve neither.

User avatar
ClaudiaRothenbach
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:16 pm

Skin or lamps?

Postby ClaudiaRothenbach » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:14 am)

Based on the findings in paragraph 2, all three
specimens are tattooed human skin.

They found three pieces of human skin with tatoos on them.

Questions:
Are these pieces from a museum of ethnology?
(Like the shrinkheads presented during the IMT)

If not:
Are they from concentration camp inmates?
Did they kill the inmates to get the skin?
Were the inmates jews?
Were these jews killed with poison gas?
Who flayed the owner(s) of the skin?
Was there a plan of the government to do that?

Did they present a lamp or saddle made of tattood skin?

Or what did the expert analyse here?

Kacey
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:22 am
Location: N. Ireland

Tattoos and Skin

Postby Kacey » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:56 am)

friedrich braun wrote:Jews and their shabbos goyim lackeys cite this evidence that *A* Nazi made lampshades out of human skin:

Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Volume 6

[Page 123]

COPY OF DOCUMENT 3423-PS

SEVENTH MEDICAL LABORATORY
APO 403, c/o PM, NEW YORK, N.Y.

Section of Pathology
25 May 1945

SUBJECT: Identification of Tattooed Skin Hides

TO: COMMANDING GENERAL, Third U.S. Army)

(ATTN: JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL)

1. There were submitted to this laboratory section for
examination three tanned pieces of skin by Lt. Col. Givin
from Buchenwald Camp with office record designation of Case
81 T.J.A.

[Page 124]

2. The description follows:

GROSS: Specimen consists of three pieces of skin
labeled A.B.C.

PIECE A: Measures 13x13cm., is transparent and
shows a woman's head in the center and a sailor
with an anchor near the margin.

PIECE B: Measures 14x13cm., is transparent and is
a tattoo of several anchors resting on an
indefinite black mass. To the right of this mass
is a man's head.

PIECE C: Is truncated, measures 44cm. At the
base. The upper portion is 30 cm. Long and the
sides measure 46 cm. The skin is transparent and
shows two nipples in the upper area. These are 16
cm. Apart. From the nipple level to the umbilicus
is 23 « cm. A large bird, with a wingspread
measuring 28 cm., is present in the center of the
skin, upper part. A black dragon, with fire
coming from the mouth, measures 28 cm. in length
and is present in the center of the skin. To the
left of the dragon is a man in a coat of mail,
with a sword being apparently stuck in the dragon.
Man is approximately 22 cm. in length.

MICROSCOPIC: The tissue consists of bundles of
collagen showing occasional epithelial and sweat
gland remnants. Granular black pigment granules
are seen between some of the bundles.

3. Based on the findings in paragraph 2, all three
specimens are tattooed human skin.

For the Commanding Officer,

[signed] REUBEN CARES
Ruben Cares
Major M.C., Chief of pathology


Now of course this begs the question, if, and I say If, someone did flay humans for their tattood skin, then it is more than likely not to have been a Jew. Why? Because it is against Torah Law for a Jew to have themselves tattood.

If there were any Jews with tattoos, they would have been as scarce as hens teeth, and they are really scarce, believe me as I was raised on a farm.

Now glasses for hens, ah now, that's another story.

Cheers,

Kacey


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests