Anne Frank’s Diary Gains ‘Co-Author’ / and more

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Hase
Member
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu May 30, 2019 1:47 am

Re: Anne Frank’s Diary Gains ‘Co-Author’ / and more

Postby Hase » 4 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jun 10, 2020 10:11 pm)

Didn't Dr. Robert Faurisson prove that The Diary was "a literary hoax." Indeed if you read some of his writings; they point out rather glaring flaws in The Diary.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Anne Frank’s Diary Gains ‘Co-Author’ / and more

Postby Moderator » 4 months 2 weeks ago (Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:33 am)

Hase wrote:Didn't Dr. Robert Faurisson prove that The Diary was "a literary hoax." Indeed if you read some of his writings; they point out rather glaring flaws in The Diary.

Please review this thread. Faurisson's exposure of the "diary" and the various telltale handwritings within it are covered.
i.e.:
search.php?keywords=faurisson&t=9924&sf=msgonly
search.php?keywords=handwriting&t=9924&sf=msgonly
Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2114
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Anne Frank’s Diary Gains ‘Co-Author’ / and more

Postby Lamprecht » 4 months 2 weeks ago (Thu Jun 11, 2020 10:02 am)

I do not see this quoted in the thread. I think nitpicking over Anne Frank's diary having entries made by her father or someone else after the war is a waste of time and effort. The reality of Anne Frank and her diary is that it is a symbol of the "Holocaust" but none of the contents support the "Holocaust" story or disagree with "Holocaust denial." I think that is more significant and meaningful than her father adding, removing, or modifying entries after the war to make some money publishing a book.

If you look at all of the people surrounding Anne Frank, none of them were gassed at Auschwitz despite the allegation that it was an "extermination camp" with homicidal gas chambers. So in what way were they Holocausted?

Richard A. Widmann in "The Importance of Anne Frank:
While Anne Frank’s story is tragic, you ignore the manner of death of the 8 people in the Annex. The official history is that non-working Jewish people arriving at Auschwitz were all “gassed.” But of the eight sent to Auschwitz on September 3, 1944 from the Annex, not one of them was killed in a gas chamber. Instead, five of the eight were transported back to Germany-Austria in November 1944.

The details of the eight individuals from the Annex are:

The Frank Family was detained for failing to report for labor service and for going into hiding.

1. Anne Frank– sent to Auschwitz, then transported to Belsen where she died of typhus (in Belsen not Auschwitz).

2. Otto Frank– left behind in Auschwitz with those in the sick barracks. Survived the War.

3. Edith Frank-Holländer–left behind in Auschwitz as the Germans retreated.

4. Margot Frank (Anne’s older sister) died of typhus in Belsen (not Auschwitz).

5. Fritz Pfeffer, sent to Auschwitz then transported to Neuengamme concentration camp where he died on 20 December 1944. His cause of death is listed in the camp records as “enterocolitis.”

6. Auguste van Pels born Auguste Röttgen (Hermann’s wife), whose date of death is unknown. Witnesses testified that she was with the Frank sisters during part of their time in Bergen-Belsen. According to German records, van Pels was sent to Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in Germany with a group of eight women on November 26, 1944. Hannah Goslar’s testimony was that she spoke to van Pels through the barbed wire fence “in late January or early February”. Auguste was transferred on February 6, 1945 to Raguhn (Buchenwald in Germany), then to the Czechoslovakia camp Theresienstadt ghetto on April 9, 1945.

7. Peter van Pels died in Mauthausen (not Auschwitz).

8. Hermann van Pels died in Auschwitz. It is often claimed that he was “gassed.” However, according to eyewitness testimony, this did not happen on the day of his arrival there. Sal de Liema, an inmate at Auschwitz who knew both Otto Frank and Hermann van Pels, said that after two or three days in the camp, van Pels mentally “gave up.” He later injured his thumb on a work detail, and requested to be sent to the sick barracks. There is no evidence whatever for the assertion that Hermann van Pels was gassed.

The pattern is the same with other groups closely associated with Anne Frank who were also sent to Auschwitz from Holland.

9. Eva Geiringer — born May 11, 1929. Sent to Auschwitz May 1944 Step-sister of Anne Frank. Survived the War.

10. “Fritzy” Geiringer, mother of Eva, Married Otto Frank. Survived the War.

11. Heinz Geiringer, brother. Survived Auschwitz but died on a forced march out of the camp.

12. “Pappy” Geiringer. Survived Auschwitz but died on a forced march out of the camp.

The Geiringers were immigrants from Austria; They too ignored a call up for labor service received July 6, 1942 and went into hiding. They were found out on May 11, 1944, detained and were sent to Auschwitz that month.

13. Janny Brandes-Brilleslijper. Was arrested for forgery. Was in the Westerbork, Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen concentration camps. Traveled to Auschwitz on the same train as the Frank family and to Belsen with Anne and Anne’s older sister Margot. Survived the War.

14. Lientje, sister of Janny. Was in the Westerbork, Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen concentration camps with Janny. Survived the War.

Elsewhere you have praised the “relentless pursuit of historical details.” You are right. Details allow us to learn what really happened. In this case the details tell us that none of the people traveling with Anne Frank died in “gas chambers.” Why? And why did the Germans transport Anne, her sister, Janny, Lientje and so many others back into Germany in 1944? These are details which should profoundly affect our, and your, understanding of German policies.
From:
The Importance of Anne Frank
https://codoh.com/library/document/4543/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests