Here are her inane comments:
I have challenged her to debate in which we can argue these points until the cows come home.
But before that I have one thing to say about people like this and the Allies whom they sided with.
People like this are why Europe itself and European countries all around the world are being destroyed. Churchill and his ilk were egotistical buffoons of an old world that was deluding itself into thinking that Europe would dominate the world forever. Adolf Hitler knew the state of the white world was threatened, he spoke during the war of the white races disappearing in the far east, the "propaganda" predicted a France ruled by Africans - and Hitler saw the decline of the United States and the ascent of Bolshevism. He was right. Cultural Marxism, or as the German National Socialists called it "Cultural Bolshevism" is now the norm in the European world.
This is something Churchill had to say about Hitler in 1939:
Churchills ignorance to the state of European civilisation and his pious reverence to the religion of Christ advocated the destruction of Hitler, an alliance with the atheistical Russians who couldn't have been MORE hostile to Christianity.
Churchill in the 60s wanted to advocate the "race ascendancy" of Britain far too fucking late for it to have mattered. The Windrush had landed, and Churchill was sidelined. No going back.
Churchill if he were alive today to see London turned black and brown would have surely thought twice about his derision of "a new religion founded on race"; if that tipsificator were around today to see Britain's empire destroyed and mocked not least in it's own great universities he surely wouldn't have turned down Hitler who generously offered the Empire his protection.
But here we have it. The vindication of Hitler, the fact that you cannot water down the primacy of race. The race is, as Adolf Hitler knew, the centre of all things and will not be replaced by phoney bourgeois intellectualism focussed on "culture, history, ideas and values" for that kind of thinking makes men believe they're the arbiters of civilisation - they are not; nature surely is, for good or ill the one who dispassionately forces upon civilisations her eternal laws that men are subjected to. When men violate these laws, as they do by believing that they can mould humanity, dregs and all, to their conceptions rather than needing men and women who already embody in biology the physical character necessary to give rise to those conceptions in the first place by virtue of that genetic racial disposition. These men are the ones who force the hand of nature to cut him down to size when the consequences of delusion become known as they surely have. Churchill, as our example by his neglect of race paved the way for racial indifference and then racial replacement by those who do not neglect that which is sacred and primal.
Churchill, Evola, Spengler and no doubt others were fools in this regard. They belittled race or made it something purely ethereal. Now we have the perspicuous first hand result of this delusion playing itself out before our very eyes in the 21st century. Europe will NOT LIVE without Europeans. We are, as Europeans, a biological reality, we are a RACE and without us nothing of our achievements can exist in a form that is worthy of our ancestors. Only a fool would deny this.
I mean seriously, how could a British Nationalist decry the Germans and their goals in good faith? You cannot. Daughter of Albion is one of these typical two-faced Nationalists, ones who admire and romanticize Victorian/Colonial Britain yet cry out in anger about German ambitions in the 20th century. It's pathetic.
I would do well to remind you that in 1938-1939 one need only have looked at a map to see who ruled the world.
My post on an example of Hitler's alleged "deceitfullness" in regards to promises
My post refuting another ethnic Chauvinist, Niall Ferguson
My post refuting Operation Sealion Myth
My post showing how the Poles declared war first
My post shredding British racist "The Britisher" on the Battle of Britain
My Article on how the British deceived Hitler during the May Crisis provoked by Czechoslovakia
(this is already common knowledge, the fact that she doesn't know this is either out of sheer ignorance or deceit)
It is a mainstream fact that Hitler preemptively circumvented a British invasion of Norway through Denmark which was used as a launchpad.
But he had no idea that he would knock France out of the war when he invaded Belgium and Holland on 10 May 1940. This was a defensive move: to secure the Ruhr from Allied invasion.
Source: AJP Taylor, Origins of the Second World War, Second Thoughts
A quick note on bombing.
The British have this asinine habit of glorifying their spitfires and in the same breath denouncing the German Luftwaffe for bombing Britain.
When the British are rightfully criticized for their barbarous campaign of terror bombing, murdering as POLICY the German people to induce surrender - they defend it wholeheartedly under the guise that they "had no choice". After all, how could Britain have fought without bombs if they couldn't invade continental Europe? Well, they didn't have to declare war for one thing. But nevertheless they have a point, the only thing the British could do is bomb Germany in hopes that it would have an effect on morale. This wasn't the case, but it's understandable how they could think that. However it isn't understandable why they suddenly perk up their ears whenever a nerve is struck, such as the bombing of Coventry or the Blitz over London (which Churchill provoked):
Charles De Gaulle was at Chequers. It was August 1949. Churchill was waiting for the German air attack, and, De Gaulle later recalled, he was finding the wait hard to bear. He raised both fists to the sky. "So they don't come!" he said. "Are you in such a hurry," De Gaulle replied, "to see your towns smashed to bits?" "You see," Churchill said, "the bombing of Oxford, Coventry, Canterbury, will cause such a wave of indignation in the United States that they'll come into the war!"
Source: Nicholson Baker, Human Smoke (this was on the epub, I do not have a page number)
This being the case, there's a saying in mathematics in regards to fractions - what you do to the bottom you do to the top. Hence, what applied to Britain applied to Germany as well, Germany could only fly over to Britain and bomb her as that was the only thing Britain could do to Germany, yet the double standard is so pervasive that it was somehow wrong for the Germans to do it while the British were merely "noble" responders. This is false, and despicable.