Depth Charge says:
WTC 1/2 - No wreckage, no human remains, no WTC airliner. And? Your point is? Are you also going to tell us 'no planes' hit those buildings? Do you understand what happens when a plane hits a building at that speed?
- My point is that wreckage and human remains would be available to see if an airliner hit the Pentagon, as I said before.
- Yes, when an airliner allegedly hits a building we would necessarily have massive wreckage and human remains, as I said before.
BTW: How fast can a big commercial airliner actually go at just a few feet in elevation?
- I note that you ignored the claim that 125 people, not in the airplane, but supposedly IN the Pentagon, who could not have been made into your airplane "confetti" were allegedly killed
, so where are those remains?
How fast were THEY traveling? Sitting at a desk speed? Walking speed?
What's funny? "Moving parts", per your insinuation - that the airliner was taken somewhere else and destroyed in secret, making the more complex. The victims were also taken somewhere else and murdered in secret. Their remains were destroyed in secret. Meanwhile, also per your insinuation (insinuation only because you're offering no retort, but smileys), a missile or bomb was planted, liars were recruited to regale us of tales of the plane hitting and then engineers were also brought in to cut down lamp posts. Parts of a similar plane, of a similar color were also driven to the scene and planted. Pictures from a different wreckage, but similar, according to you, were also presented to the public.
- I never said the airliner was taken anywhere. It was obviously not an airliner that hit the Pentagon is what I do say, Please pay attention.
- I never said humans were taken somewhere & murdered, but given the atrocities committed, its not beyond the realm of the possible.
- I do say that something other than a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon.
- What "liars" are you speaking of? Please tell us who they are and what they supposedly said.
- Your pictures and parts / wreckage, which you said would have been made into confetti, but obviously were not
, are simple fakes. Please actually read what I said before.
- And you continue to dodge the reporter's report and his video of the site which do not show wreckage, do not show human remains.
- I seriously doubt that Shankesville is the topic of the OP. Please read the OP title & contents.
- What we need is a real, verifiable, observed, legit investigation to determine the details, as I said before. Please pay attention.